Copenhagen Suborbital kick off campaign - July 27-29


rocketfriends.org

There is 2 livestreams:

With commentary from Steen Eiler Jørgensen/CS
www.livestream.com/csscph

All available cameras
http://www.livestream.com/cssaarhus

  • #18 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 05:45
  • Rest of the fleet is starting to departs from Nexoe

    it is
    Leopold Rosenfelt Range safety/Recovery

    MHV 903 Hjortoe Mission control

    LRB 18 Range safety/Recovery
  • #19 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 06:12
  • Article on the work behind the livestream

    Rocket friends getting ready to broadcast live from the Planetarium

    Hope it all work out so we get some live pictures  :)

  • #20 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 06:23
  • Live blog and sound from the control room at ing.dk

    You are able to make on the fly translation, by change the setting in the chat window. It is the same used last year, and from what i understand it made a OK job at translation as there was people from all around the world in there

    http://ing.dk/tema/raket




  • #21 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 07:45
  • Looks like it is live.... but with problems  :'(
    I am at the Tycho Brahe Planetarium, and they say there be no sound on the stream.



  • #22 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 08:23
  • Sound at http://www.livestream.com/cssaarhus
    Video at http://www.livestream.com/csscph



  • #23 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 08:32
  • Still ships in the range
  • #24 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 08:35
  • Had to get back to MLP Sputnik to turn off the cams, because of the launch delay due to the ship in the range
  • #25 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 08:38

  • #26 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 08:42
  • Cam from rocket
  • #27 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 08:58

  • #28 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:04

  • #29 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:07

  • #30 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:10
  • payload cam on
  • #31 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:12
  • crew left Sputnik
  • #32 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:19
  • Rocket did not ignite  :-[
  • #33 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:22
  • Tried to send the signal to launch 2 times but no cigar.


  • #34 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:25
  • pad crew going back to Sputnik
  • #35 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:26

  • #36 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:31

  • #37 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:35

  • #38 by Silmfeanor on 27 Jul, 2012 09:37
  • thanks for the coverage so far  ;)
  • #39 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:49
  • you are welcome... just hope i have power enough on my laptop... first laptop is down, on my second now  :)

    Sound like VHF is the problem for getting the radio signal to the rocket
  • #40 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 09:52
  • Next try 12:50 CET, one hour from now
  • #41 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 10:50
  • Article on the launch problem
  • #42 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 10:53
  • payload cam get turned on again
  • #43 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 10:58
  • Crew leaving the MLP

    Sure must be easier if they were able to launch from ground  :D
  • #44 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:00

  • #45 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:01

  • #46 by IRobot on 27 Jul, 2012 11:01
  • Someone get this man a tripod!!
  • #47 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:05
  • Sound like their FIDO software is working as it supposed to
  • #48 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:07
  • Missed that   :D

    Just saw smoke!!
  • #49 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:10
  • Crew going back to MLP Sputnik
  • #50 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:12
  • Sputnik returning to Nexoe
  • #51 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:15
  • Payload is found!!
  • #52 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:15

  • #53 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:17

  • #54 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:20

  • #55 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:23

  • #56 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:31

  • #57 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 11:59
  • Think the video live feed ended up being fine, when you think there is no TV network in on it
  • #58 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 12:07
  • Nose Cone broke into pieces shortly after the rocket start
  • #59 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 12:35
  • Glad someone did manages to get a screenshot of the liftoff  :D



    The rocket came in the air!


  • #60 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 13:57
  • Gallery with pictures of the launch


    Foto: Jev Olsen/CS

    Watch the rocket nose cone being ripped off

  • #61 by mr. mark on 27 Jul, 2012 14:07
  • Hopefully, they will learn from this and move on with a second launch.
  • #62 by Morten C. on 27 Jul, 2012 14:15
  • Hopefully, they will learn from this and move on with a second launch.

    I am sure they will. Learn a lot from mistakes.

    There is already talks about making a stronger nose cone. But lets hear what they say when they get to Nexoe Port. Also looking forward to see what pictures and video they got.

    Regards
    Morten
  • #63 by Morten C. on 28 Jul, 2012 09:20
  • For some reason this video was removed and reposted,so here it is again


  • #64 by Morten C. on 01 Aug, 2012 16:19
  • Some evaluation of the launch.



    Wired blog with more information
    SMARAGD-1 Launch Evaluation

    More pictures
    Gallery

    Article on Space.com
    Danish Space Travel Team Launches Private Rocket Test

    Summary video of the day at the Baltic sea


    Slowmotion of the seperation


    What they did manages to get out of the payload, before it broke off and hit the water.


    Enjoy

    Regards
    Morten
  • #65 by mr. mark on 01 Aug, 2012 16:29
  • I know this is a research/amateur based institution but, it seems as if they are running rough shot in their learning curve. Possibly over packing parachutes on a upcoming LES test and saying that their sounding rocket was partially a success when there was a catastrophic payload failure which resulted in the rocket only achieving several thousand feet does not inspire. Better to concentrate on one aspect of operations may be best. Get the sounding rocket right before moving forward with other things. Much can be learned from US commercial sounding rocket firms such as UP aerospace which has had several successful launches. That said I still believe in what they are doing and hope for every success in the future. 
  • #66 by Morten C. on 01 Aug, 2012 16:50
  • I know this is a research/amateur based institution but, it seems as if they are running rough shot in their learning curve. Possibly over packing parachutes on a upcoming LES test and saying that their sounding rocket was partially a success when there was a catastrophic payload failure which resulted in the rocket only achieving several thousand feet does not inspire. Better to concentrate on one aspect of operations may be best. Get the sounding rocket right before moving forward with other things. Much can be learned from US commercial sounding rocket firms such as UP aerospace which has had several successful launches. 

    I do tend to agree. Although CS is divided in 2 main departments: Rocket engines and spacecrafts. Kristian von Bengtson, needs to test his subsystems to move on in his department. You could say it would be easier to drop TDS from a plane, but that is not allowed, so a LES system was made. And by doing so there have been some spinoff like explosive bolts etc. Funny enough it is allowed to have a man jump from a plane to test the parachutes.

    But they do have lots of projects going on, maybe to many
  • Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Go to page:

    Navigation