Many cargo/satellite launch vehicles rely on solids, the presence of which massively complicate an abort. For an abort of the all-liquid F9 isn't it possible the range might simply terminate thrust, rather than destroy the vehicle? Wouldn't that create an environment where the Dragon separation motors could detach the capsule from the trunk without exposing the interior cargo to off-nominal g forces?
Many cargo/satellite launch vehicles rely on solids, the presence of which massively complicate an abort. For an abort of the all-liquid F9 isn't it possible the range might simply terminate thrust, rather than destroy the vehicle?
1. I take your main point: "old space" doesn't do it that way. But is SpaceX different, especially when it's launching Dragon on F9?2. Wouldn't that create an environment where the Dragon separation motors could detach the capsule from the trunk without exposing the interior cargo to off-nominal g forces?
FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.
Quote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....
Quote from: jacqmans on 10/01/2012 07:16 pmQuote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not..... There's aerospace hardware all over the place, they'd have to hide it all and provide extra security if they allowed foreigners, impacting their operations. ITAR is eyeTAR, I agree, but it makes some sense in this case.
Quote from: jacqmans on 10/01/2012 07:16 pmQuote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not..... Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.
Quote from: Ben the Space Brit on 10/01/2012 08:14 pmQuote from: jacqmans on 10/01/2012 07:16 pmQuote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not..... Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!
Quote from: jacqmans on 10/02/2012 05:23 amQuote from: Ben the Space Brit on 10/01/2012 08:14 pmQuote from: jacqmans on 10/01/2012 07:16 pmQuote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not..... Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!International partners aren't funding it.
Quote from: manboy on 10/02/2012 07:07 amQuote from: jacqmans on 10/02/2012 05:23 amQuote from: Ben the Space Brit on 10/01/2012 08:14 pmQuote from: jacqmans on 10/01/2012 07:16 pmQuote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not..... Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!International partners aren't funding it.They take international cargo up....
Quote from: Robotbeat on 10/01/2012 07:54 pmQuote from: jacqmans on 10/01/2012 07:16 pmQuote from: Chris Bergin on 10/01/2012 05:47 pmFALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY SpaceX security regulations require that media representativesattending this event be U.S. citizens. REMOTE CAMERA SETUPSSpaceX security regulations require that news media representativesparticipating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens. I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not..... There's aerospace hardware all over the place, they'd have to hide it all and provide extra security if they allowed foreigners, impacting their operations. ITAR is eyeTAR, I agree, but it makes some sense in this case. What would be the difference between US media and foreign media
I think the SpaceX press event (if it's like any of their other ones) includes stuff inside their hangar, which has eye-tar-sensitive stuff all over.It sucks, though.
Quote from: Robotbeat on 10/02/2012 03:25 pmI think the SpaceX press event (if it's like any of their other ones) includes stuff inside their hangar, which has eye-tar-sensitive stuff all over.It sucks, though.Yea sure, and why was it possible to see everything inside the hangar in July 2011, even for foreign media, and get close to the Falcon rocket, and photograph everything you would like ..... And now they say we are not welcome anymore...that is the strange part of it....
Yea sure, and why was it possible to see everything inside the hangar in July 2011, even for foreign media, and get close to the Falcon rocket, and photograph everything you would like ..... And now they say we are not welcome anymore...that is the strange part of it....
I suppose it could be something specifically about this flight, although what could be visible from the base of the pad that would be a security risk is beyond my knowledge.