Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION  (Read 688202 times)

Offline spacetraveler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 26
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #200 on: 10/01/2012 12:44 am »
Many cargo/satellite launch vehicles rely on solids, the presence of which massively complicate an abort. For an abort of the all-liquid F9 isn't it possible the range might simply terminate thrust, rather than destroy the vehicle? Wouldn't that create an environment where the Dragon separation motors could detach the capsule from the trunk without exposing the interior cargo to off-nominal g forces?

I don't think the engines have remote control. I believe the only remote system on the vehicle is the FTS.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #201 on: 10/01/2012 01:07 am »

Many cargo/satellite launch vehicles rely on solids, the presence of which massively complicate an abort. For an abort of the all-liquid F9 isn't it possible the range might simply terminate thrust, rather than destroy the vehicle?

No and Mmst do not.  Solids are not the reason for destruct charges.  Liquid vehicles like Delta IV and Atlas V have them to disperse propellants.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #202 on: 10/01/2012 01:09 am »

1. I take your main point: "old space" doesn't do it that way. ;) But is SpaceX different, especially when it's launching Dragon on F9?

2. Wouldn't that create an environment where the Dragon separation motors could detach the capsule from the trunk without exposing the interior cargo to off-nominal g forces?


1.  No, it has nothing to do with "old space", it has to do with protecting the public.

2.  No, the sep system does not provide enough distance

Offline spectre9

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2403
  • Australia
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 68
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #203 on: 10/01/2012 05:54 pm »
Thanks Chris good time for a launch.

Monday morning for me  :D

Dragon been seen yet?

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21808
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8704
  • Likes Given: 321
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #204 on: 10/01/2012 07:16 pm »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(
Jacques :-)

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #205 on: 10/01/2012 07:54 pm »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(
There's aerospace hardware all over the place, they'd have to hide it all and provide extra security if they allowed foreigners, impacting their operations. ITAR is eyeTAR, I agree, but it makes some sense in this case.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #206 on: 10/01/2012 08:14 pm »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21808
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8704
  • Likes Given: 321
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #207 on: 10/02/2012 05:20 am »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(
There's aerospace hardware all over the place, they'd have to hide it all and provide extra security if they allowed foreigners, impacting their operations. ITAR is eyeTAR, I agree, but it makes some sense in this case.

???  What would be the difference between US media and foreign media ???
Jacques :-)

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21808
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8704
  • Likes Given: 321
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #208 on: 10/02/2012 05:23 am »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.

And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!
Jacques :-)

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #209 on: 10/02/2012 07:07 am »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.

And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!

International partners aren't funding it.
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21808
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8704
  • Likes Given: 321
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #210 on: 10/02/2012 07:25 am »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.

And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!

International partners aren't funding it.

They take international cargo up....
Jacques :-)

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12192
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18491
  • Likes Given: 12560
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #211 on: 10/02/2012 07:33 am »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.

And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!

International partners aren't funding it.

They take international cargo up....

But that does not make the cargo-mission international. It's a cargo mission being carried out under the US obligations to ISS. So, it's a US mission, regardless of what cargo is on-board. Same applies to cargo missions of ATV and HTV. Those are European and Japanese cargo-flights, despite the fact that they carry cargo from just-about all participating nations.

(Un)fortunately, ESA is a little more consistent in it's policies regarding near-pad photography. They allow exactly nobody to set up near-pad set-ups, except the people of CSG and their in-house photographer  :P
« Last Edit: 10/02/2012 07:37 am by woods170 »

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #212 on: 10/02/2012 03:02 pm »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(
There's aerospace hardware all over the place, they'd have to hide it all and provide extra security if they allowed foreigners, impacting their operations. ITAR is eyeTAR, I agree, but it makes some sense in this case.

???  What would be the difference between US media and foreign media ???

The State Department believes there's a difference between US citizens and non-US citizens. That's the difference.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #213 on: 10/02/2012 03:22 pm »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.

And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!


now your in the downside of "commercial"......SpaceX can make their own rules.
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #214 on: 10/02/2012 03:25 pm »

FALCON 9 LAUNCH PAD PHOTO OPPORTUNITY

 SpaceX security regulations require that media representatives
attending this event be U.S. citizens.

REMOTE CAMERA SETUPS

SpaceX security regulations require that news media representatives
participating in any activity inside the pad be U.S. citizens.


I thought by now, foreign media would be welcome, but still not.....  >:( :o :o >:(

Would any bus taking you to the pad have to go by LC-37B, LC-41 or the DoD spacecraft handling facilities? That alone might be a cause for security restrictions.

And why can I as foreign media go to launches of Atlas and Delta rockets... I would see that to then... I can even drive my own car to go to remote camera set up for ULA launches... So what SpaceX does makes no sense at all.... They have to let Foreign media in at some point since this is an INTERNATIONAL space station flight !!!

I think the SpaceX press event (if it's like any of their other ones) includes stuff inside their hangar, which has eye-tar-sensitive stuff all over.

It sucks, though.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21808
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8704
  • Likes Given: 321
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #215 on: 10/02/2012 03:32 pm »

I think the SpaceX press event (if it's like any of their other ones) includes stuff inside their hangar, which has eye-tar-sensitive stuff all over.

It sucks, though.

Yea sure, and why was it possible to see everything inside the hangar in July 2011, even for foreign media, and get close to the Falcon rocket, and photograph everything you would like ..... And now they say we are not welcome anymore...that is the strange part of it....
« Last Edit: 10/02/2012 03:32 pm by jacqmans »
Jacques :-)

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #216 on: 10/02/2012 03:34 pm »

I think the SpaceX press event (if it's like any of their other ones) includes stuff inside their hangar, which has eye-tar-sensitive stuff all over.

It sucks, though.

Yea sure, and why was it possible to see everything inside the hangar in July 2011, even for foreign media, and get close to the Falcon rocket, and photograph everything you would like ..... And now they say we are not welcome anymore...that is the strange part of it....

They made a mistake?
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #217 on: 10/02/2012 03:48 pm »
I suppose it could be something specifically about this flight, although what could be visible from the base of the pad that would be a security risk is beyond my knowledge.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #218 on: 10/02/2012 04:02 pm »
Yea sure, and why was it possible to see everything inside the hangar in July 2011, even for foreign media, and get close to the Falcon rocket, and photograph everything you would like ..... And now they say we are not welcome anymore...that is the strange part of it....

Have you contacted anyone about this? To the effect of why "Social media users selected to attend the SpaceX launch will be given the same access as journalists in an effort to align the access and experience of social media representatives with those of traditional media." when clearly social media are allowed to be non-U.S. AND be allowed on site:
"International social media users without U.S. citizenship must apply for credentials to cover the prelaunch and launch activities by Wednesday, Sept 26. "


http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/sep/HQ_12-336_Social_Media_Accred.html

Complaining about it here won't change anything.
« Last Edit: 10/02/2012 04:02 pm by ugordan »

Offline mduncan36

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 210
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS SpX-1 MISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
« Reply #219 on: 10/02/2012 04:12 pm »
I suppose it could be something specifically about this flight, although what could be visible from the base of the pad that would be a security risk is beyond my knowledge.

Take your engineer hat off and put your American lawyer hat on. It only has to be vaguely worded somewhere. Doesn't have to make sense.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0