Author Topic: SCRUB: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon COTS Demo (C2+) LAUNCH ATTEMPT 1 UPDATES  (Read 209264 times)

Online Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23395
  • Liked: 1881
  • Likes Given: 1045
« Last Edit: 05/19/2012 09:03 am by Ronsmytheiii »

Offline marshallsplace

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 705
  • UK
    • music website
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Well that was exciting :) Thanks NSF for the great coverage as usual!

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
Ugh. Chamber pressure was the reason for the scrub.

Hope that doesn't mean an engine change. If so, May might be right out...

Quote
Fantastic coverage Chris.

Ditto.

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Strongback to be raised.
In progress, almost done.

Offline seawolfe

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
  • South of Seattle and east of Tacoma
  • Liked: 58
  • Likes Given: 4484
Disappointing, but good safety measures.  Better a safe abort on the pad than a spectacular failure.... a big Ka-boom type of failure.  Now they can turn it around and try again.

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Gwynne said 50/50 chance of launch. Launch team sounded smooth…
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline clongton

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12102
  • Connecticut
    • Direct Launcher
  • Liked: 7499
  • Likes Given: 3809
The launch control team sounds very professional. At Abort they just went thru the numbers. Any emotion was suppressed under procedure.
Chuck - DIRECT co-founder
I started my career on the Saturn-V F-1A engine

Offline JBF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1459
  • Liked: 472
  • Likes Given: 914
The big question is was a a real issue or a sensor fault.
"In principle, rocket engines are simple, but that’s the last place rocket engines are ever simple." Jeff Bezos

Offline Jason1701

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2232
  • Liked: 70
  • Likes Given: 152
The big question is was a a real issue or a sensor fault.

Likely an overly-tight limit.

Offline Chandonn

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1241
  • "Pudding!!! UNLIMITED Rice Pudding!!!"
  • Lexington, Ky
  • Liked: 14
  • Likes Given: 17
The big question is was a a real issue or a sensor fault.

Based on the two previous launches, I predict it's just an overly-conservative limit that will be relaxed in the future...


Tweet from Musk.

Launch aborted: slightly high combustion chamber pressure on engine 5. Will adjust limits for countdown in a few days.


Ah, new(er) vehicle: learning curve!
« Last Edit: 05/19/2012 09:10 am by Chandonn »

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133

Offline sitharus

  • Member
  • Posts: 55
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 3
The big question is was a a real issue or a sensor fault.

Likely an overly-tight limit.

Elon seems to agree: Launch aborted: slightly high combustion chamber pressure on engine 5. Will adjust limits for countdown in a few days.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/203773618222678016

Offline spacetraveler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 26
The big question is was a a real issue or a sensor fault.

Likely an overly-tight limit.

Tweet from Musk.

Launch aborted: slightly high combustion chamber pressure on engine 5. Will adjust limits for countdown in a few days.

Offline Chris Bergin

They did so well to have such a smooth count. This situation is 100 times better than failing on the way uphill.

We'll see what additional info we can get in L2 and we'll summarize any important elements.

A little bit disgusted by a few comments at scrub, but three people on a site getting hit 160 times a second ain't too bad. Never quote and respond, we moderate and get rid of such stupidity (takes longer to remove the response too).
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Hungry4info3

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
  • Liked: 163
  • Likes Given: 81
Great coverage. Looking forward to the next attempt.

Offline Rahkashi

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 208
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Sometime today or later? I thought the next window was Tuesday at 3:44 am?

Offline Kabloona

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4847
  • Velocitas Eradico
  • Fortress of Solitude
  • Liked: 3432
  • Likes Given: 741
The big question is was a a real issue or a sensor fault.

Likely an overly-tight limit.

Wow. Record time for abort analysis.

Tweet from Musk.

Launch aborted: slightly high combustion chamber pressure on engine 5. Will adjust limits for countdown in a few days.

Wow. Record time for that failure analysis. Like he was almost expecting it...
« Last Edit: 05/19/2012 09:09 am by Kabloona »

Offline AJA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Per Aspera Ad Ares, Per Aspera Ad Astra
  • India
  • Liked: 146
  • Likes Given: 212
The launch control team sounds very professional. At Abort they just went thru the numbers. Any emotion was suppressed under procedure.

That was the SpaceX loop, on NASATV. The SpaceX feed immediately cut in with commentary after 15 seconds. And now it's offline.

Offline Alpha Control

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 104
Sometime today or later? I thought the next window was Tuesday at 3:44 am?

Tuesday May 22 at 3:44am is the next launch attempt date & time.
Space launches attended:
Antares/Cygnus ORB-D1 Wallops Island, VA Sept 2013 | STS-123 KSC, FL March 2008 | SpaceShipOne Mojave, CA June 2004

Offline grakenverb

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • New York
  • Liked: 31
  • Likes Given: 27
Thanks for the great coverage Chris! 

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0