Author Topic: CCDev to CCiCAP to CCtCAP Discussion Thread  (Read 811354 times)

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #960 on: 04/30/2014 01:55 am »
The question is did the contents Elon's speech at news conference on Friday trigger Rogozin's 'trampoline' tweet.

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2361
  • USA
  • Liked: 1977
  • Likes Given: 989
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #961 on: 04/30/2014 01:59 am »
The question is did the contents Elon's speech at news conference on Friday trigger Rogozin's 'trampoline' tweet.
No, that would be the latest round of EU and US Hi-Tech Export sanctions that he was responding to.
Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #962 on: 04/30/2014 02:30 am »
The question is did the contents Elon's speech at news conference on Friday trigger Rogozin's 'trampoline' tweet.
No, that would be the latest round of EU and US Hi-Tech Export sanctions that he was responding to.

Its good news that Elon's speech wasn't cause.
The bad news is that ISS has now been directly effected by the political events.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #963 on: 05/01/2014 01:20 am »
House draft appropriation bill proposes $785M for commercial crew for FY 2015. See link below:

USA Today says commercial crew would get $785M under the proposed bill:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/30/nasa-commercial-crew-program-house-appropriations/8527815/

Quote from: USA Today article
A key House Appropriations subcommittee voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a spending plan that would provide $785 million for the Commercial Crew Program in fiscal 2015.
« Last Edit: 05/01/2014 01:20 am by yg1968 »

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #964 on: 05/01/2014 01:44 am »
That's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #965 on: 05/01/2014 01:51 am »
House draft appropriation bill proposes $785M for commercial crew for FY 2015. See link below:

USA Today says commercial crew would get $785M under the proposed bill:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/30/nasa-commercial-crew-program-house-appropriations/8527815/

Quote from: USA Today article
A key House Appropriations subcommittee voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a spending plan that would provide $785 million for the Commercial Crew Program in fiscal 2015.
This is great news, I'm glad the House is starting to support the program.
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #966 on: 05/01/2014 02:12 am »
That's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.

There was no prior number as far as I know. The House and Senate usually meet somewhere in the middle. Hopefully the Senate will propose $850M (as the President requested) and they will meet in the middle at $818M.

Republicans have called the supplemental DOA from the outset. Democrats knew it was DOA when they proposed it. 
« Last Edit: 05/01/2014 02:15 am by yg1968 »

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #967 on: 05/01/2014 02:17 am »
That's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.

There was no prior number as far as I know. The House and Senate usually meet somewhere in the middle. Hopefully the Senate will propose $850M (as the President requested) and they will meet in the middle at $818M.

Republicans have called the supplemental DOA from the outset. Democrats knew it was DOA when they proposed it.

Yes, but they requested cash on top of that and it would have gone over a billon for FY 015 right?
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Online docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
DM

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #969 on: 05/01/2014 07:35 am »
A Federal judge has issued an injunction on ULA re: RD-180's

http://m.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/elon-musks-spacex-granted-injunction-in-rocket-launch-suit-against-lockheed-boeing/2014/04/30/4b028f7c-d0cd-11e3-937f-d3026234b51c_story.html
I didn't expect that to happen. I wonder how this will effect Boeing's and Sierra Nevada's bids.
« Last Edit: 05/01/2014 10:42 am by manboy »
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #970 on: 05/01/2014 01:35 pm »
That's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.

There was no prior number as far as I know. The House and Senate usually meet somewhere in the middle. Hopefully the Senate will propose $850M (as the President requested) and they will meet in the middle at $818M.

Republicans have called the supplemental DOA from the outset. Democrats knew it was DOA when they proposed it.

Yes, but they requested cash on top of that and it would have gone over a billon for FY 015 right?

Yes but that was in the supplemental which has been called DOA as soon as it was released. The supplemental funds were to accelerate the commercial crew program.  I never took the supplemental request seriously. It was just pre-midterm election postering.

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #971 on: 05/01/2014 03:50 pm »
Let's not go into motivations of something that is OFF TOPIC for this thread.  Trimmed.
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline GalacticIntruder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 513
  • Pet Peeve:I hate the word Downcomer. Ban it.
  • Huntsville, AL
  • Liked: 247
  • Likes Given: 70
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #972 on: 05/05/2014 02:33 am »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.
"And now the Sun will fade, All we are is all we made." Breaking Benjamin

Offline guckyfan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7442
  • Germany
  • Liked: 2336
  • Likes Given: 2900
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #973 on: 05/05/2014 07:09 am »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

Which probably means with two flights a year and 3 astronauts each he would not be cheaper than Sojus. Who can be surprised at this launch rate?


Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #974 on: 05/05/2014 12:20 pm »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

Excellent video story,  but parts of it seem many months old or what's presented isn't correct. 
For Example: The recent Boeing number of passengers is different etc.
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #975 on: 05/05/2014 12:27 pm »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

Which probably means with two flights a year and 3 astronauts each he would not be cheaper than Sojus. Who can be surprised at this launch rate?

The Crew program was designed for two flights.   One early milestones was to have a 2nd market lined up for the Commercial market.   Maybe someone else could confirm this.

The down select is going to be a real popcorn event.



2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #976 on: 05/05/2014 04:30 pm »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

That means $560M per year. That is not that cheap. It's $70M per seat if you fly 8 astronauts per year (assuming that there is no reduction for ordering only two flights per year). That's the same price as Soyuz.
« Last Edit: 05/05/2014 04:34 pm by yg1968 »

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #977 on: 05/05/2014 04:36 pm »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

Which probably means with two flights a year and 3 astronauts each he would not be cheaper than Sojus. Who can be surprised at this launch rate?

The Crew program was designed for two flights.   One early milestones was to have a 2nd market lined up for the Commercial market.   Maybe someone else could confirm this.

The down select is going to be a real popcorn event.

There is no milestones related to having a commercial market. But it does help youre business case if you have one.

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #978 on: 05/05/2014 04:53 pm »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

That means $560M per year. That is not that cheap. It's $70M per seat if you fly 8 astronauts per year (assuming that there is no reduction for ordering only two flights per year). That's the same price as Soyuz.
Still better than sending it to Russia.
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline baldusi

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8371
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Liked: 2555
  • Likes Given: 8365
Re: CCDev to CCiCAP Discussion Thread
« Reply #979 on: 05/05/2014 05:54 pm »
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhoo


The one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.

That means $560M per year. That is not that cheap. It's $70M per seat if you fly 8 astronauts per year (assuming that there is no reduction for ordering only two flights per year). That's the same price as Soyuz.
That's 140M per flight. If they can do two flights for 160M with four crew each that's still 40M per seat. Even at 200M per flight (with four crew) is only 50M per seat. Still cheaper than Soyuz.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1