The question is did the contents Elon's speech at news conference on Friday trigger Rogozin's 'trampoline' tweet.
Quote from: TrevorMonty on 04/30/2014 01:55 amThe question is did the contents Elon's speech at news conference on Friday trigger Rogozin's 'trampoline' tweet.No, that would be the latest round of EU and US Hi-Tech Export sanctions that he was responding to.
USA Today says commercial crew would get $785M under the proposed bill:http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/30/nasa-commercial-crew-program-house-appropriations/8527815/Quote from: USA Today articleA key House Appropriations subcommittee voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a spending plan that would provide $785 million for the Commercial Crew Program in fiscal 2015.
A key House Appropriations subcommittee voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a spending plan that would provide $785 million for the Commercial Crew Program in fiscal 2015.
House draft appropriation bill proposes $785M for commercial crew for FY 2015. See link below:Quote from: yg1968 on 05/01/2014 12:56 amUSA Today says commercial crew would get $785M under the proposed bill:http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/30/nasa-commercial-crew-program-house-appropriations/8527815/Quote from: USA Today articleA key House Appropriations subcommittee voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a spending plan that would provide $785 million for the Commercial Crew Program in fiscal 2015.
That's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.
Quote from: Lar on 05/01/2014 01:44 amThat's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.There was no prior number as far as I know. The House and Senate usually meet somewhere in the middle. Hopefully the Senate will propose $850M (as the President requested) and they will meet in the middle at $818M. Republicans have called the supplemental DOA from the outset. Democrats knew it was DOA when they proposed it.
A Federal judge has issued an injunction on ULA re: RD-180'shttp://m.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/elon-musks-spacex-granted-injunction-in-rocket-launch-suit-against-lockheed-boeing/2014/04/30/4b028f7c-d0cd-11e3-937f-d3026234b51c_story.html
Quote from: yg1968 on 05/01/2014 02:12 amQuote from: Lar on 05/01/2014 01:44 amThat's less than the number on the bill pre markup I think. Certainly less than the Administration request. What was the fate of the supplemental? Axed I expect.There was no prior number as far as I know. The House and Senate usually meet somewhere in the middle. Hopefully the Senate will propose $850M (as the President requested) and they will meet in the middle at $818M. Republicans have called the supplemental DOA from the outset. Democrats knew it was DOA when they proposed it. Yes, but they requested cash on top of that and it would have gone over a billon for FY 015 right?
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhooThe one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.
Quote from: GalacticIntruder on 05/05/2014 02:33 amhttp://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhooThe one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.Which probably means with two flights a year and 3 astronauts each he would not be cheaper than Sojus. Who can be surprised at this launch rate?
Quote from: guckyfan on 05/05/2014 07:09 amQuote from: GalacticIntruder on 05/05/2014 02:33 amhttp://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhooThe one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.Which probably means with two flights a year and 3 astronauts each he would not be cheaper than Sojus. Who can be surprised at this launch rate?The Crew program was designed for two flights. One early milestones was to have a 2nd market lined up for the Commercial market. Maybe someone else could confirm this.The down select is going to be a real popcorn event.
Quote from: GalacticIntruder on 05/05/2014 02:33 amhttp://www.bloomberg.com/video/star-wars-the-battle-to-build-the-next-shuttle-GYBY6msZSKqUp41iUWoAFA.html?cmpid=yhooThe one takeaway I got is that Elon says he needs a minimum of 4 flights per year and a full compliment of astronauts (28?) for 20 million per seat.That means $560M per year. That is not that cheap. It's $70M per seat if you fly 8 astronauts per year (assuming that there is no reduction for ordering only two flights per year). That's the same price as Soyuz.