Author Topic: Planetary Resources  (Read 380604 times)

Offline Robert Thompson

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1177
  • Liked: 101
  • Likes Given: 658
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #120 on: 05/22/2012 09:21 pm »

Offline Robert Thompson

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1177
  • Liked: 101
  • Likes Given: 658
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #121 on: 05/25/2012 07:02 pm »
"OSIRIS-REx Scientists Measure Yarkovsky Effect"
http://uanews.org/node/47370
"the asteroid has deviated from its gravity-ruled orbit by roughly 100 miles, or 160 kilometers, in the last 12 years, a deviation caused by the Yarkovsky effect."

Offline krytek

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 535
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #122 on: 05/26/2012 11:31 pm »
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/elon-musk-hangout/
Toward the end Elon gets asked about PR. Says asteroid mining doesn't make sense for Earth, makes more sense for Mars, mentions propellant.

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #123 on: 05/26/2012 11:49 pm »
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/elon-musk-hangout/
Toward the end Elon gets asked about PR. Says asteroid mining doesn't make sense for Earth, makes more sense for Mars, mentions propellant.


And I don't think the Planetary Resources guys would argue the point with him much.  Fuel and imaging is likely to turn a profit before Platinum groups will.
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline LegendCJS

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 575
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #124 on: 05/27/2012 12:16 am »
A "water" asteriod contains 22% water, so a 700,000kg asteriod whose water in high Lunar orbit is worth $20,000/kg would yeild  just in water $3B!

The 7m diameter is the chosen size for tugging to cis-lunar space.  No asteroid is going to have 20% ice left after that process unless very well taken care of and sourced form very far away from the sun.

The 7e5 kg mass number is for the densest possible 7m diameter asteroid I assume.  Which doesn't make sense because a 7m diameter sphere of iron is 1.2e6 kg.  However an ice asteroid will not be nearly that dense, 1.8e5 kg if all liquid water, less if ice, which won't make it to high lunar orbit without lots of care.

Remember: if we want this whole space thing to work out we have to optimize for cost!

Offline Warren Platts

Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #125 on: 05/27/2012 02:10 am »
Quote from: oldAtlas_Eguy link=topic=28680.msg898317#msg898317 date=1337/*211905
A "water" asteriod contains 22% water, so a 700,000kg asteriod whose water in high Lunar orbit is worth $20,000/kg would yeild  just in water $3B!

The 7m diameter is the chosen size for tugging to cis-lunar space.  No asteroid is going to have 20% ice left after that process unless very well taken care of and sourced form very far away from the sun.

The 7e5 kg mass number is for the densest possible 7m diameter asteroid I assume.  Which doesn't make sense because a 7m diameter sphere of iron is 1.2e6 kg.  However an ice asteroid will not be nearly that dense, 1.8e5 kg if all liquid/////// water, less if ice, which won't make it to high lunar orbit without lots of care.

There is no "ice" to be found in NEA's. The water content that is there is chemically bound to serpentine minerals. The closest analogy is portland cement. The concrete in your local sidewalk is also 20% water. This is what they're talking about going after....
« Last Edit: 05/27/2012 02:18 am by Warren Platts »
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."--Leonardo Da Vinci

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #126 on: 05/28/2012 02:33 am »
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/elon-musk-hangout/
Toward the end Elon gets asked about PR. Says asteroid mining doesn't make sense for Earth, makes more sense for Mars, mentions propellant.


It depends on the price and availability of PGM materials. One could make an argument that the possibility of shortages of PGM on Earth may exceed the probabilities of anyone going to Mars - in the next 40 years.

Offline Warren Platts

Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #127 on: 05/28/2012 04:21 am »
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/elon-musk-hangout/
Toward the end Elon gets asked about PR. Says asteroid mining doesn't make sense for Earth, makes more sense for Mars, mentions propellant.


It depends on the price and availability of PGM materials. One could make an argument that the possibility of shortages of PGM on Earth may exceed the probabilities of anyone going to Mars - in the next 40 years.

There just isn't enough PGM's in easily accessible NEA's to be worth it, or to make a difference in the supply situation. You would be lucky to find a metal asteroid with 50 ppm Pt. Thus, for a million kg metal asteroid that was snagged and dragged to an L2 processing plant would yield a grand total of 50 kg Pt. At $100K/kg, the Pt would only be worth $5M. Mere chicken feed.

Meanwhile, a 20% H20 CI-type NEA could generate maybe 130 mT of propellant, which if you could get $2K/kg for it at L2 would be worth ~$260M. Not enough to make you into a trillionaire, but not exactly chicken feed either.
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."--Leonardo Da Vinci

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #128 on: 05/28/2012 03:56 pm »

There just isn't enough PGM's in easily accessible NEA's to be worth it, or to make a difference in the supply situation. You would be lucky to find a metal asteroid with 50 ppm Pt.

It would be incredible if the only NEOs found in accessible orbits were limited to 50 ppm of PGMs.

Thus, for a million kg metal asteroid that was snagged and dragged to an L2 processing plant would yield a grand total of 50 kg Pt. At $100K/kg, the Pt would only be worth $5M. Mere chicken feed.


You are assuming that anyone would be stupid enough to exploit a low grade asteroid.

Also, you are assuming that no one would ever take the time to refine the ore before returning it to Earth.

If you made bad assumptions, sure, PGM metals from asteroids will never be exploited.
« Last Edit: 05/28/2012 04:00 pm by Danderman »

Offline Warren Platts

Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #129 on: 05/28/2012 06:08 pm »

There just isn't enough PGM's in easily accessible NEA's to be worth it, or to make a difference in the supply situation. You would be lucky to find a metal asteroid with 50 ppm Pt.

It would be incredible if the only NEOs found in accessible orbits were limited to 50 ppm of PGMs.

Incredible or not, that's not far from the truth.

Note that I wrote 50 ppm Pt. Total PGM's could be expected to be roughly double that amount. Highest Pt concentrations ever found in a meteorite are on the order of 80 ppm; since there is much lateral variation of composition within an asteroid, this 80 ppm represents an upper limit for parts of an asteroid; a large metallic asteroid would tend to have an average concentration of Pt of less than 80 ppm, therefore.

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=28675.msg890500#msg890500

http://www.nss.org/settlement/asteroids/RoleOfNearEarthAsteroidsInLongTermPlatinumSupply.pdf

Quote from: Danderman
Thus, for a million kg metal asteroid that was snagged and dragged to an L2 processing plant would yield a grand total of 50 kg Pt. At $100K/kg, the Pt would only be worth $5M. Mere chicken feed.

You are assuming that anyone would be stupid enough to exploit a low grade asteroid.

50 g/t (ppm) Pt ore is considered to be very high grade on Earth. It's just not enough to make it worth it, at least if the business model requires capturing of small asteroids and bringing them to high Earth orbit for processing.

Quote
Also, you are assuming that no one would ever take the time to refine the ore before returning it to Earth.

This is pretty much the only way it could be accomplished. A Pt rich asteroid with a diameter on the order of 100+ meters  and massing on the order of 2.5 million mT could be expected to produce roughly 100 to 1000 mT of PGM's.


« Last Edit: 05/31/2012 11:36 pm by Warren Platts »
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."--Leonardo Da Vinci

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline Warren Platts

Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #131 on: 06/07/2012 06:56 am »
Wall Street Journal article on asteroid mining:

Not very optimistic!

Quote from: WSJ
Investors led by Google Inc. GOOG +1.78% Chief Executive Larry Page and film director James Cameron in April launched Planetary Resources Inc., based in Bellevue, Wash., with a message that the Earth's resources could soon fail to meet the technological needs of a population spiraling toward 10 billion.

Caterpillar Inc., CAT +3.60% one of the world's largest makers of mining equipment, has already joined with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to design space-mining gear. "We looked at autonomous operations of equipment as being the same type of technology that could be used on the Moon as well as in a mining application," said Michele Blubaugh, manager of Intelligence Technology Services at Caterpillar.

But firms that make their money mining this planet say the Earth is one big, practically inexhaustible mine, with just as many unexplored corners as outer space. "We think there are 10,000 more years of minerals left for civilization," said Andrew McKenzie, a geologist and BHP Billiton BHP +3.27% PLC's chief executive for nonferrous metals.

There's an interesting quote from Eric Anderson:

Quote from: WSJ
Eric Anderson, a co-founder of Planetary Resources, the space-mining start-up, said he has already figured out how to mine a 396-foot-long asteroid, which he estimates contains 330 tons of platinum, at an expense of $431 an ounce, slightly higher than the cost of mining platinum on Earth. Possible methods range from robots to wrapping the asteroid in a bag that would dissolve the minerals.

[However,] Willi Boehm, an executive at Perth, Australia-based Aquarius Platinum Ltd., AQP.AU +9.11% one of the world's biggest platinum producers, doesn't think asteroid mining can be done so inexpensively. He said platinum sale prices must reach multiples of today's price of $1,500 to make space mining worthwhile. He added, "We have enough problems just mining in Africa."

That's interesting: not $400, not $500 per ounce, it's $431 per ounce. I'm extremely curious how he gets at that figure. (Of course I've got him beat: I've figured out how to mine gold on the Moon for $124 per ounce! ;) )
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."--Leonardo Da Vinci

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #132 on: 06/07/2012 07:10 am »
it's $431 per ounce. I'm extremely curious how he gets at that figure.
Yes.  Hopefully he will demonstrate it for us.  396 feet long?  I guess that implies Edit non-cylindrical spherical.  But even if it were Edit: cylindrical spherical (the high-case), 330 tons of platinum (493 cubic feet) in a volume of 32515000 cubic feet gives a volumetric platinum concentration of 0.00001516   

That's 15 ppm if I did that right.  Probably bounded by 50 ppm or so on the high side. 

This concentration range is in line with your estimates Warren. 
« Last Edit: 06/16/2012 02:13 am by go4mars »
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline Warren Platts

Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #133 on: 06/07/2012 09:55 am »
That's reasonable: it's in the right order of magnitude ballpark anyways. 32515000 cubic feet is about a million cubic meters. It's going to mass anywhere from 3 to 8 million mT, so obviously, there's no bringing that thing into Earth orbit, which means the processing plant and mining equipment will have to be transported out there. I guess it's just a matter of getting enough IMLEO...

One other thing I thought interesting about the article is that although it emphasized the number of years we have to exploit reserves at current extraction rates, the time left for gold reserves are only 18 years. So Lunar gold is looking bullish despite the article IMO!
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."--Leonardo Da Vinci

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #134 on: 06/07/2012 01:29 pm »
One other thing I thought interesting about the article is that although it emphasized the number of years we have to exploit reserves at current extraction rates, the time left for gold reserves are only 18 years. So Lunar gold is looking bullish despite the article IMO!
I've previously worked for an independent reserves evaluation company.  I've learned that over time, most people underestimate how technologies evolve, new discoveries are made, and commodity prices rise according to demand, which by definition brings more resources into the category of technical reserves.  18 years for what is currently defined as gold reserves perhaps.  But it isn't like 19 years from now the miners will be unable to extract gold (though a price rise could make it unattractive to use in circuitry etc. for a while in a tight market until some clever person figures out how to extract more at that higher price level).   Maybe on the moon.  ;)
« Last Edit: 06/07/2012 01:32 pm by go4mars »
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline Wyvern

  • Member
  • Posts: 99
  • Welp here I am
  • Calgary
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #135 on: 06/08/2012 05:12 am »
Is it just me or does that WSJ link not provide a visualization of any of the platinum group metals?

I've been trying to search the web to find up to date (2011+) estimates on the total reserves of platinum group metals and I have been unsuccessful.  Does anyone have an good links to papers identifying how big the reserves of platinum group metals are, specifically on Earth?
Darn it where is my Moon base!

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #136 on: 06/08/2012 10:17 pm »
http://abundantplanet.org/

These guys might have it.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #137 on: 06/11/2012 12:29 am »
I have been stuck on the problem of how Planetary Resources plans to get the platinum back to Earth, and just realized that maybe they don't plan to return the platinum back to Earth - maybe they expect to sell the platinum in space to whoever needs it there.

Offline Calphor

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • Liked: 210
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #138 on: 06/11/2012 05:02 am »
Is it just me or does that WSJ link not provide a visualization of any of the platinum group metals?

I've been trying to search the web to find up to date (2011+) estimates on the total reserves of platinum group metals and I have been unsuccessful.  Does anyone have an good links to papers identifying how big the reserves of platinum group metals are, specifically on Earth?

Try here http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/platinum/. There are several good estimates of both consumption as well as reserves. The latest survey being http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/platinum/mcs-2012-plati.pdf.

Offline IRobot

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1311
  • Portugal & Germany
  • Liked: 310
  • Likes Given: 272
Re: Planetary Resources
« Reply #139 on: 06/11/2012 10:09 am »
I have been stuck on the problem of how Planetary Resources plans to get the platinum back to Earth, and just realized that maybe they don't plan to return the platinum back to Earth - maybe they expect to sell the platinum in space to whoever needs it there.
What is so difficult? It is worth so much you could discard a Dragon on each flight and still make money.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1