Author Topic: Icebreaker mission  (Read 5177 times)

Offline SpaceGeek123

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Icebreaker mission
« on: 04/01/2012 08:53 pm »
Dr Robert Zubrin has argued for years that a Human mission to Mars is possible without getting mission funding. One of his proposals in 1996 was an Icebreaker mission. A low cost mission that would demonstrate to NASA that long duration human interplanetary spaceflight is doable. For this he proposed the Athena Manned Mars Flyby or the Giasheild Asteroid mission. Still NASA has no plans of doing this either. Thats when I got thinking. What if a private organization were organized for conducting an Icebreaker type mission to spur NASA into doing a Human Mars mission (or moon mission, or something).
Here's what I have in mind

A Falcon heavy can sends an Upper-stage with the required fuel to send the crew to the trajectory. Then a Falcon 9 send the dragon with the consumables, crew and supplies. The 2 dock and the upper stage is fired. If the destination is Mars then we could use the same trajectory as the Athena mission with it in Mars vicinity for around 1 year. 17 tonnes could be sent on this trajectory. Since the Dragon is only 4.2 tonnes this should leave enough to provide the crew with a inflatable Hab (witch Zubrin estimates could have a mass of just 200 kg) and all the supplies needed.
The cost should be within a private organization.
Falcon Heavy: $80 million
Falcon 9/Dragon: $150 million
Operations cost: $100 million
Upper-stage, food space suits, supplies ect:$50 million
Total:$380 million
Elon musk or any other major investor could easily fund this.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #1 on: 04/01/2012 09:03 pm »
NASA is, in fact, planning an asteroid mission. By 2025.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37811
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22031
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #2 on: 04/01/2012 09:08 pm »
Dr Robert Zubrin has argued for years that a Human mission to Mars is possible without getting mission funding. One of his proposals in 1996 was an Icebreaker mission. A low cost mission that would demonstrate to NASA that long duration human interplanetary spaceflight is doable. For this he proposed the Athena Manned Mars Flyby or the Giasheild Asteroid mission. Still NASA has no plans of doing this either. Thats when I got thinking. What if a private organization were organized for conducting an Icebreaker type mission to spur NASA into doing a Human Mars mission (or moon mission, or something).
Here's what I have in mind

A Falcon heavy can sends an Upper-stage with the required fuel to send the crew to the trajectory. Then a Falcon 9 send the dragon with the consumables, crew and supplies. The 2 dock and the upper stage is fired. If the destination is Mars then we could use the same trajectory as the Athena mission with it in Mars vicinity for around 1 year. 17 tonnes could be sent on this trajectory. Since the Dragon is only 4.2 tonnes this should leave enough to provide the crew with a inflatable Hab (witch Zubrin estimates could have a mass of just 200 kg) and all the supplies needed.
The cost should be within a private organization.
Falcon Heavy: $80 million
Falcon 9/Dragon: $150 million
Operations cost: $100 million
Upper-stage, food space suits, supplies ect:$50 million
Total:$380 million
Elon musk or any other major investor could easily fund this.


Double it to get the real costs

Offline ChefPat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1055
  • Earth, for now
  • Liked: 125
  • Likes Given: 1022
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #3 on: 04/01/2012 10:02 pm »
A Falcon Second Stage would never make it to Mars with sufficient O2 to make an Earth Return burn.
« Last Edit: 04/02/2012 01:39 am by ChefPat »
Playing Politics with Commercial Crew is Un-American!!!

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #4 on: 04/01/2012 10:17 pm »
Dr Robert Zubrin has argued for years that a Human mission to Mars is possible without getting mission funding. One of his proposals in 1996 was an Icebreaker mission. A low cost mission that would demonstrate to NASA that long duration human interplanetary spaceflight is doable. For this he proposed the Athena Manned Mars Flyby or the Giasheild Asteroid mission. Still NASA has no plans of doing this either. Thats when I got thinking. What if a private organization were organized for conducting an Icebreaker type mission to spur NASA into doing a Human Mars mission (or moon mission, or something).
Here's what I have in mind

A Falcon heavy can sends an Upper-stage with the required fuel to send the crew to the trajectory. Then a Falcon 9 send the dragon with the consumables, crew and supplies. The 2 dock and the upper stage is fired. If the destination is Mars then we could use the same trajectory as the Athena mission with it in Mars vicinity for around 1 year. 17 tonnes could be sent on this trajectory. Since the Dragon is only 4.2 tonnes this should leave enough to provide the crew with a inflatable Hab (witch Zubrin estimates could have a mass of just 200 kg) and all the supplies needed.
The cost should be within a private organization.
Falcon Heavy: $80 million
Falcon 9/Dragon: $150 million
Operations cost: $100 million
Upper-stage, food space suits, supplies ect:$50 million
Total:$380 million
Elon musk or any other major investor could easily fund this.


Double it to get the real costs
If so, that's still not that bad.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline SpaceGeek123

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #5 on: 04/02/2012 12:23 am »
Zubrin estimated his SpaceX Human Mars landing would cost $500 million (although thats probably on the extreme low end of the possible cost). Even Assuming a cost of $800 million thats probably still affordable by a group of investors. You could sell 6 tickets to universities and governments at a cost of $125 m.

As for the Mission I say the most productive mission options go as follows. Either you spend 1 year in Mars Vicinity like in the Athena mission (using 2 flybys of Mars) or you spend a short time in Mars vicinity and a Venus flyby like in the triple planet Flyby mission proposal from the 1970s (2 mars flybys and 1 venus flyby).

To maximize useable hardware for later missions I suggest you could discard your Hab you were living in and leave it in a Cycling orbit between Earth, Mars and possibly Venus if you propose that mission option (similer to what Aldrin proposed)

It may also be possible for a lower cost mission (circumlunar or an Asteroid)

Ya they are proposing a Asteroid flight but I have doubts it will happen politically (who knows what the 2025 administration will be doing)

Online Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
  • Liked: 727
  • Likes Given: 840
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #6 on: 04/03/2012 08:22 am »
As for the Mission I say the most productive mission options go as follows. Either you spend 1 year in Mars Vicinity like in the Athena mission (using 2 flybys of Mars) or you spend a short time in Mars vicinity and a Venus flyby like in the triple planet Flyby mission proposal from the 1970s (2 mars flybys and 1 venus flyby).
What do the total mission durations look like for these options? And what requirement is there for propulsive manoeuvres post earth-escape?

Quote
To maximize useable hardware for later missions I suggest you could discard your Hab you were living in and leave it in a Cycling orbit
If I am understanding you correctly, the crew have a Dragon plus inflatable module- but they will need to use the Dragon to return to Earth. So that leaves a 200kg inflatable module in a cycler orbit. I believe that utilising a cycler orbit requires a greater total dela-v and imposes tighter launch window constraints, so saving 200kg is almost certainly not worth it.
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #7 on: 04/05/2012 07:50 pm »
A Falcon Second Stage would never make it to Mars with sufficient O2 to make an Earth Return burn.
Because of boil-off?
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline ChefPat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1055
  • Earth, for now
  • Liked: 125
  • Likes Given: 1022
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #8 on: 04/05/2012 09:17 pm »
A Falcon Second Stage would never make it to Mars with sufficient O2 to make an Earth Return burn.
Because of boil-off?
Yes. It wouldn't be insulated for more than 24 hours or so.
Playing Politics with Commercial Crew is Un-American!!!

Offline SpaceGeek123

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #9 on: 04/06/2012 10:39 pm »
Your probably write saving the Hab would not be worth it.

You could use a free return trajectory and I have heard of some witch use Venus Flyby's. I'm not sure if the Athena trajectory is a free return but from the way they describe in in the document it appears that way.

Another possible mission plan is to have a Soyuz with the inflatable Hab and a Bloc DM launched on a Zenit booster dock in orbit and sent off on the trajectory together. Basically its a variation DSE Alpha or Zond going on a Mars/Venus flyby. 2 Zenits may be needed for the higher energy trajectories.

http://cmapspaceexp.ihmc.us/rid=1JWVZ8RM5-TQKTP4-18RG/Mars%20Free%20Returns%20Via%20Gravity%20Assist%20from%20Venus.pdf

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #10 on: 04/06/2012 11:24 pm »
There already was a proposed IceBreaker mission:
http://www.ri.cmu.edu/publication_view.html?pub_id=447
http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/projects/lri/icebreaker/

I suppose it lives on in Red Whittakers team at Astrobotic.
« Last Edit: 04/06/2012 11:25 pm by savuporo »
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Offline SpaceGeek123

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Icebreaker mission
« Reply #11 on: 04/06/2012 11:49 pm »
No what I ment was a demonstration of Manned Interplanetary Space flight. Robert Zubrin describes this as a "Icebreaker" type mission. Your links aren't really relevant to the discussion. But thanks anyway.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1