EDIT: corrodedNut image suggests the POV is from the Dragon looking down. We'll know for sure soon.
Quote from: Lars_J on 05/23/2012 04:23 pmEDIT: corrodedNut image suggests the POV is from the Dragon looking down. We'll know for sure soon.I see the opposite, am I the only one? The camera looks to be behind the strut while the gold file moves away from both.
There was a female voice heard on the SpaceX webcast just before the switch from the video looking back at MVac to that shot saying something like "camera's forward".
Quote from: dcporter on 05/23/2012 04:33 pmI see the opposite, am I the only one? The camera looks to be behind the strut while the gold file moves away from both.Look at Ed Kyle's images again. The strut is definitely getting smaller and more of it is coming into view in the later frames, suggesting that it is not stationary with respect to the camera viewpoint.
I see the opposite, am I the only one? The camera looks to be behind the strut while the gold file moves away from both.
Quote from: LegendCJS on 05/23/2012 04:18 pmQuote from: Lars_J on 05/23/2012 03:47 pmYep, that definitely seemed to be an internal shot looking up at the trunk from the 2nd stage.Why would you think that? At the instant of separation all wired data links between cameras in the second stage and the video transmitters that would presumably be located on the Dragon would have been severed. I thinks it is a trunk mounted camera looking back at the second stage. Otherwise there would be unnecessary duplication of video transmitter equipment. 2nd stage cameras would only have to link to the transmitters on the trunk. Some pretty small wireless cameras would reach a couple hundred feet.
Quote from: Lars_J on 05/23/2012 03:47 pmYep, that definitely seemed to be an internal shot looking up at the trunk from the 2nd stage.Why would you think that? At the instant of separation all wired data links between cameras in the second stage and the video transmitters that would presumably be located on the Dragon would have been severed. I thinks it is a trunk mounted camera looking back at the second stage. Otherwise there would be unnecessary duplication of video transmitter equipment.
Yep, that definitely seemed to be an internal shot looking up at the trunk from the 2nd stage.
Quote from: ugordan on 05/23/2012 04:35 pmThere was a female voice heard on the SpaceX webcast just before the switch from the video looking back at MVac to that shot saying something like "camera's forward".There was also a female voice exclaiming "Dragon Separation!" at the moment of SECO, then a moment later you can hear her mumble something trying to cover the fact that she jumped the gun.
Seeing the SpaceX staff crowd cheering when the solar panels deployed was awesome! Politics aside, these young motivated people certainly deserve this mission to be successful.
Quote from: avollhar on 05/22/2012 03:21 pmSeeing the SpaceX staff crowd cheering when the solar panels deployed was awesome! Politics aside, these young motivated people certainly deserve this mission to be successful.THey were just happy they still have jobs!
Quote from: LegendCJS on 05/23/2012 04:36 pmQuote from: dcporter on 05/23/2012 04:33 pmI see the opposite, am I the only one? The camera looks to be behind the strut while the gold file moves away from both.Look at Ed Kyle's images again. The strut is definitely getting smaller and more of it is coming into view in the later frames, suggesting that it is not stationary with respect to the camera viewpoint.Uncle.
Quote from: dcporter on 05/23/2012 04:44 pmQuote from: LegendCJS on 05/23/2012 04:36 pmQuote from: dcporter on 05/23/2012 04:33 pmI see the opposite, am I the only one? The camera looks to be behind the strut while the gold file moves away from both.Look at Ed Kyle's images again. The strut is definitely getting smaller and more of it is coming into view in the later frames, suggesting that it is not stationary with respect to the camera viewpoint.Uncle. Here's a gif made up from a few image captures. The video started at the 9:58 mark, blanked out at the 10:01 mark, and then briefly reappeared during 10:02. - Ed Kyle
Why do I keep hearing about the age of the SpaceX people? Who cares what age they are. We are living longer than ever, but lately in the media / job market it appears that age discrimination is greater than ever before. I am only 34 by the way, but I am really concerned about this trend. We better not be planning to discount / discard our workers in the future just because they are over some arbitrary age limit.I don't care if the SpaceX guys are 20 or 60 as long as they do a killer job.
Quote from: demorcef on 05/23/2012 05:10 pmWhy do I keep hearing about the age of the SpaceX people? Who cares what age they are. We are living longer than ever, but lately in the media / job market it appears that age discrimination is greater than ever before. I am only 34 by the way, but I am really concerned about this trend. We better not be planning to discount / discard our workers in the future just because they are over some arbitrary age limit.I don't care if the SpaceX guys are 20 or 60 as long as they do a killer job.You hear about it because people notice it. I dragged my 16 year old sister out of bed to watch the launch with me and she mentioned how young many of the employees seemed. She also commented on the general informality of the atmosphere (and dress).
I wear jeans and athletic shoes every day (Hawaiian shirts on Friday) except when in the LCC for launch and formal meetings
Quote from: Lobo on 05/23/2012 04:53 pmQuote from: avollhar on 05/22/2012 03:21 pmSeeing the SpaceX staff crowd cheering when the solar panels deployed was awesome! Politics aside, these young motivated people certainly deserve this mission to be successful.THey were just happy they still have jobs! Not all people hate their jobs like you. They were happy because they saw the product of their work, not because of their paycheck.