Author Topic: Boeing CST-700 Plans  (Read 3087 times)

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9790
  • Liked: 1474
  • Likes Given: 890
Boeing CST-700 Plans
« on: 01/17/2012 06:54 pm »
« Last Edit: 01/17/2012 07:11 pm by yg1968 »

Offline strangequark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
  • Co-Founder, Tesseract Space
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Liked: 219
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: Boeing CST-700 Plans
« Reply #1 on: 01/17/2012 07:51 pm »
After reading the article, I call bad, lazy journalism.

EDIT: Retracted. See below post.
« Last Edit: 01/18/2012 12:54 am by strangequark »

Offline dcporter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 873
  • Liked: 246
  • Likes Given: 411
Re: Boeing CST-700 Plans
« Reply #2 on: 01/17/2012 07:54 pm »
Nah, just a popular-sci column doing a sparkly-future piece and clearly labeling it as such. Alan B is allowed to do the occasional unicorn porn.

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9790
  • Liked: 1474
  • Likes Given: 890
Re: Boeing CST-700 Plans
« Reply #3 on: 01/17/2012 08:23 pm »
After reading the article, I call bad, lazy journalism.

Why is it lazy journalism? He reported on what Elbon said. I think most of the questions were asked by students at that conference. I don't think that reporters were allowed to ask questions. Elbon may have been musing. It's hard to tell. I find that Alan Boyle is one of the better journalist. He also often links NSF threads in his blog.
« Last Edit: 01/17/2012 08:39 pm by yg1968 »

Offline strangequark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
  • Co-Founder, Tesseract Space
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Liked: 219
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: Boeing CST-700 Plans
« Reply #4 on: 01/18/2012 12:54 am »
After reading the article, I call bad, lazy journalism.

Why is it lazy journalism? He reported on what Elbon said. I think most of the questions were asked by students at that conference. I don't think that reporters were allowed to ask questions. Elbon may have been musing. It's hard to tell. I find that Alan Boyle is one of the better journalist. He also often links NSF threads in his blog.

I retract my statement. It was bad, lazy reading on my part. Somehow I missed the reference to CST-100. I thought that Elbon was talking about tourism applications of CST-100 and someone had misheard/mistyped it as CST-700 and gotten excited about a "new" spacecraft. My apologies to the original author.

Tags: