The Oatmeal's take on Insight's mission:https://theoatmeal.com/comics/insight
Quote from: eeergo on 11/21/2018 10:35 amThe Oatmeal's take on Insight's mission:https://theoatmeal.com/comics/insightCute. However: "Pulling 12 g in 2 minutes"? I wish he'd have written "for" instead of "in". Why are units so difficult to understand?
Quote from: meekGee on 11/24/2018 04:37 amQuote from: eeergo on 11/21/2018 10:35 amThe Oatmeal's take on Insight's mission:https://theoatmeal.com/comics/insightCute. However: "Pulling 12 g in 2 minutes"? I wish he'd have written "for" instead of "in". Why are units so difficult to understand? For is clearly wrong, that would be a constant deceleration of a total of 14.4km/s.'a maximum of' seems likely to be correct, based on maths performed without the aid of envelopes, and the peak G period would last a dozen seconds or so.
InSight arrival to Mars, detail
Quote from: lamid on 11/25/2018 01:05 pmInSight arrival to Mars, detailI don't know how much you know javascript, anyway this is a page I am using to automatically plot Horizons data:http://win98.altervista.org/space/exploration/insight/horizons-insight.html
From yesterday's news from JPL: "In just over 24 hours, NASA's InSight spacecraft will complete its seven-month journey to Mars. It will have cruised 301,223,981 miles (484,773,006 km) at a top speed of 6,200 mph (10,000 kph)."Is a top speed of 6,200 mph right for an Earth-Mars transfer?