FY-2F FengYun-2F CZ-3A (Y22) Xichang launch - January 13th, 2012

  • #37 by spacex on 14 Jan, 2012 00:38
  • So China has the first and only two orbital launches in the year so far - probably a first.
  • #38 by input~2 on 14 Jan, 2012 12:00
  • We now have object B:
  • 2012-002B/38050 in  224.3 x 35941.0 km x 24.31°
    (epoch Jan 13, 0757:41UTC)
    somewhat closer to the announced FY-2F initial orbit.

  • The altitude of the apogee, 35941 km, is to be compared with the following information from the CZ-3A User's Manual:
     
    Quote from:  LM-3A User's Manual
    The standard GTO is the baseline mission with following injection parameters from XSLC.
     Perigee Altitude Hp 200 km
     Apogee Altitude Ha 35,958* km
     Inclination i 28.5 Deg
     Perigee Argument ω 179.6 Deg
     
     Note: * The parameters [above] represent the SC’s immediate orbit upon
     separation, where Ha corresponds to the altitude of 35,786km when the SC arrives at its first apogee after a period of unpowered flight, taking into account the perturbation caused by the earth’s oblateness.
    [/u][/u]
  • #39 by Paul Howard on 16 Jan, 2012 03:01


  • "During this time-lapse taken from the VLT complex at Paranal observatory, I caught an small sequence of a rare blurred object (0:14-0:18). The object is probably related to the launch of the FengYun-2F satellite from China (2012-01-13 at 00:56 UT), because is consistent with the moment when this object appeared in the sky (01:39 UT). The object turned fainter and vanished after some minutes.
    P.S. Thanks to Douglas Pierce-Price for your help in identify this object!"
  • #40 by Apollo-phill on 16 Jan, 2012 17:01
  • Just an observation from looking at the ground track using latest TLE's - these two spacecraft spend moist of each orbit over parts of the Earth that are in darkness. Bit odd for a metsat - if observing in visible light ? But, track does take it over most of the troubled military 'hotspots' .

    A-P
  • #41 by jcm on 16 Jan, 2012 19:51
  • Just an observation from looking at the ground track using latest TLE's - these two spacecraft spend moist of each orbit over parts of the Earth that are in darkness. Bit odd for a metsat - if observing in visible light ? But, track does take it over most of the troubled military 'hotspots' .

    A-P

    This is just a temporary transfer orbit. In a few days the payload will transfer to geostationary orbit where it stays above China (and will be in darkness exactly 50 percent of the time  - annually averaged - , just like China!)
    This is a totally standard orbit insertion for a geostationary metsat, no need for paranoia.
  • #42 by input~2 on 18 Jan, 2012 19:49
  • Looks now like USSTRATCOM has switched Object A and Object B.
    Old "A" is now "B" (ie 3rd stage)
    To be confirmed
  • #43 by input~2 on 19 Jan, 2012 19:02
  • Looks now like USSTRATCOM has switched Object A and Object B.
    Old "A" is now "B" (ie 3rd stage)
    To be confirmed

    Confirmed:
    Object A (FY-2F) is now nearly geostationary at 111.8°E in 35745 x 35813 km x 2.40° (epoch Jan 19 at 0356UTC)
  • Object B (CZ-3A 3rd stage) remains in 369 x 35783 km x 24.36° (epoch Jan 18 at 1254UTC)
  • #44 by Satori on 11 Sep, 2012 14:56
  • Fengyun-2F Meteorological Satellite Transferred to CMA.
  • Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Are you sure?

    Go to page:

    Navigation