Author Topic: Stratolaunch: General Company and Development Updates and Discussions  (Read 1052199 times)

Offline alexw

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1230
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 2
OK, let me approach the issue a different way: assuming that horizontal carriage requires some sort of modifications for a launch vehicle, what is the mass penalty?
Have no way computing the mods needed to convert a vertically launched vehicle to a suspended airlaunch vehicle.
       Antonioe may be able to shed a little light on this, at least some rules of thumb from one set of vehicles. Danderman, if you search I think you'll find an illuminating series of posts on the Pegasus design trades that led to the choice of a wing, the wing placement, and the pull-up maneuver.
      Taurus would seem to be an example of converting back the other way.
                -Alex

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
The recently obtained airframe for one half of WK3.
« Last Edit: 05/30/2012 03:41 am by Danderman »

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15698
  • Liked: 8336
  • Likes Given: 2
Have they produced updated images of what their aircraft will look like? The ones on the website don't look appreciably different than the early ones.

Offline MP99

Have they produced updated images of what their aircraft will look like? The ones on the website don't look appreciably different than the early ones.

ISTR that the plans for the plane were quite advanced - their hand was forced in announcing because they'd got to the stage they needed to start buying planes and building the hangar.

I suspect this is why the design hasn't changed - it had already evolved before it was announced.

cheers, Martin

Offline Garrett

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1134
  • France
  • Liked: 128
  • Likes Given: 114
Have they produced updated images of what their aircraft will look like? The ones on the website don't look appreciably different than the early ones.

ISTR that the plans for the plane were quite advanced - their hand was forced in announcing because they'd got to the stage they needed to start buying planes and building the hangar.

I suspect this is why the design hasn't changed - it had already evolved before it was announced.

An alternative possibility could be that the published images are of an early design and that they will hold off releasing any recent design info until the final aircraft is revealed.
Scaled and Allen have a history of being secretive and my guess is that they will remain that way for this project. So I expect the final design to be noticeably different from what we've seen so far.
That's my two cents of armchair speculation  ;)
- "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." - Indiana Jones

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
The recently obtained airframe for one half of WK3.

Not quite; the 747s will donate all their internal systems to the Birdzilla (cockpit, wiring, landing gear, hydraulics, etc), but the airframe itself will be an entirely new structure built from composite by Scaled.

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Wonder if they'll go with the obvious and name it White Knight Three or not?
DM

Offline Space Junkie

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 104
  • IL, USA
  • Liked: 22
  • Likes Given: 95
Wonder if they'll go with the obvious and name it White Knight Three or not?

Might be bad for Virgin from a marketing perspective. To a layman WK2 would seem like last year's model.

Stratolaunch may want to differentiate themselves from Virgin too.

This is more speculative, but Burt Rutan might also object on aesthetic grounds. WK1 and especially WK2 are objects of supreme beauty (to my eyes anyway), but Burt has criticized the appearance of the current design:

http://www.economist.com/node/21556101
Quote
“But when I saw the latest Stratolaunch drawings, I beat them up some, because it was just so…ugly.”

Mr. Rutan is not in charge anymore. However, if he thought the plane was too ugly to be called White Knight Three, I think they would respect his wishes.
« Last Edit: 06/03/2012 10:41 pm by Space Junkie »

Offline gin455res

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 513
  • bristol, uk
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 74
Which vehicle could carry wider loads a superguppy or stratolaunch?

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
The 747 parked out by the hanger has been stripped of its engines and some other components.

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Which vehicle could carry wider loads a superguppy or stratolaunch?
Definately stratolaunch (if it gets a cargo module).
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
The new hangar is being erected behind the office building, and I think at least one 747 is parked in there.
« Last Edit: 07/31/2012 02:34 pm by Danderman »

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Wikipedia (I know) says that X-37C will be about 165-180% larger than X37B whose height is 2.9 meters, so X-37C might be 4.8-5.2 meters. 

x37c might be stratolaunchable based on that one metric.  Of course there are others, but I don't think we know enough to know what the limit/performance will be.
« Last Edit: 09/06/2012 04:12 pm by go4mars »
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline vulture4

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
  • Liked: 431
  • Likes Given: 92
Wikipedia (I know) says that X-37C will be about 165-180% larger than X37B whose height is 2.9 meters, so X-37C might be 4.8-5.2 meters. 

x37c might be stratolaunchable based on that one metric.  Of course there are others, but I don't think we know enough to know what the limit/performance will be.
But what would provide upper stage propulsion?

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Wikipedia (I know) says that X-37C will be about 165-180% larger than X37B whose height is 2.9 meters, so X-37C might be 4.8-5.2 meters. 

x37c might be stratolaunchable based on that one metric.  Of course there are others, but I don't think we know enough to know what the limit/performance will be.
But what would provide upper stage propulsion?
Raptor or raptor derivative?
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6502
  • Liked: 4617
  • Likes Given: 5340
Wikipedia (I know) says that X-37C will be about 165-180% larger than X37B whose height is 2.9 meters, so X-37C might be 4.8-5.2 meters. 

x37c might be stratolaunchable based on that one metric.  Of course there are others, but I don't think we know enough to know what the limit/performance will be.

Is there anything other than a size and weight similarity to suggest that this is being considered by anyone other than internet rocket lego conceptualizers?  Someone who might not, for instance try to convert StratoLaunch into an adjective?   How many nonexistant  systems can be combined into a no consequence mental image?  Why not add a reusable hypersonic ramjet booster?  (Oh wait.  DARPA announced that....)
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline RanulfC

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
  • Heus tu Omnis! Vigilate Hoc!
  • Liked: 900
  • Likes Given: 32
Why not add a reusable hypersonic ramjet booster?  (Oh wait.  DARPA announced that....)
Wasn't that Boeing? :)

Randy
From The Amazing Catstronaut on the Black Arrow LV:
British physics, old chap. It's undignified to belch flames and effluvia all over the pad, what. A true gentlemen's orbital conveyance lifts itself into the air unostentatiously, with the minimum of spectacle and a modicum of grace. Not like our American cousins' launch vehicles, eh?


Offline HMXHMX

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Liked: 2257
  • Likes Given: 672

Offline thydusk666

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • I see dead pixels in the sky!
  • Europe
  • Liked: 8
  • Likes Given: 10
Stratolaunch passes PDR:
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/stratolaunch-carrier-aircraft-passes-preliminary-design-review-376466/

That's the a/c only.  What about the launch vehicle?

"Configuration of the rocket, built by SpaceX, has not yet been finalised. "

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0