Please disregard my previous question on 03/08/2012 10:23 AM involving the G-Cubed resolution, as my question has been answered by the NRO release of the following quote in one of their declassified documents. "GAMBIT's contribution to scientific and technical (S&T) Intelligence were unsurpassed. The mature system produced examples of imagery better than four inches ground-resolved distance (GRD). Furthermore, it exhibited excellent mensuration capabilities, allowing the S&T photointerpreter to perform accurate measurements on foreign weapons systems...". The long rumored 3 to 4 inch resolution was in fact reality.
I've asked my editor to make some changes to the article and make my mistakes disappear. On the internet, I'm a genius who makes no mistakes...So, your nominal trajectory indicates that it was only aloft for about 73 minutes. Is that correct?
Quote from: rguser on 04/17/2012 08:47 amPlease disregard my previous question on 03/08/2012 10:23 AM involving the G-Cubed resolution, as my question has been answered by the NRO release of the following quote in one of their declassified documents. "GAMBIT's contribution to scientific and technical (S&T) Intelligence were unsurpassed. The mature system produced examples of imagery better than four inches ground-resolved distance (GRD). Furthermore, it exhibited excellent mensuration capabilities, allowing the S&T photointerpreter to perform accurate measurements on foreign weapons systems...". The long rumored 3 to 4 inch resolution was in fact reality.What is the citation for that quote?
It would appear that the NRO made a mistake when they first released "The Gambit Story" because on page 154 the above quote is not redacted. I just verified that in a subsequent release of the file, part of the quote is redacted. Do you want me to attach the original release of "The Gambit Story"?On the NRO wev site, the file is located under the GAMBIT and HEXAGON Histories link and it is the ID 6 "The Gambit Story" link. Byeman Doc. Number 140002-90 pg #. 154. When opened in Adobe Reader, the software indicates that the page number is 161.Secondly do you know what the term "OTEX" means?
Yes, please post it. No, I don't know what OTEX means. JCM might.
I have posted the original release of "The Gambit Story" except for the fact that I had to reduce the file size from 30 MBs to 12 MBs to fit within the limits of the posting software used at this site.
Quote from: rguser on 04/18/2012 07:52 amIt would appear that the NRO made a mistake when they first released "The Gambit Story" because on page 154 the above quote is not redacted. I just verified that in a subsequent release of the file, part of the quote is redacted. Do you want me to attach the original release of "The Gambit Story"?On the NRO wev site, the file is located under the GAMBIT and HEXAGON Histories link and it is the ID 6 "The Gambit Story" link. Byeman Doc. Number 140002-90 pg #. 154. When opened in Adobe Reader, the software indicates that the page number is 161.Secondly do you know what the term "OTEX" means?Yes, please post it. No, I don't know what OTEX means. JCM might.
Quote from: Blackstar on 04/18/2012 11:31 amQuote from: rguser on 04/18/2012 07:52 amIt would appear that the NRO made a mistake when they first released "The Gambit Story" because on page 154 the above quote is not redacted. I just verified that in a subsequent release of the file, part of the quote is redacted. Do you want me to attach the original release of "The Gambit Story"?On the NRO wev site, the file is located under the GAMBIT and HEXAGON Histories link and it is the ID 6 "The Gambit Story" link. Byeman Doc. Number 140002-90 pg #. 154. When opened in Adobe Reader, the software indicates that the page number is 161.Secondly do you know what the term "OTEX" means?Yes, please post it. No, I don't know what OTEX means. JCM might.I don't know what it stands for, but it seems to be associated with smallpiggyback instruments - I might guess "Orbital Technology Experiment" or something meaningless like that...
Quote from: jcm on 04/19/2012 10:28 pmQuote from: Blackstar on 04/18/2012 11:31 amQuote from: rguser on 04/18/2012 07:52 amIt would appear that the NRO made a mistake when they first released "The Gambit Story" because on page 154 the above quote is not redacted. I just verified that in a subsequent release of the file, part of the quote is redacted. Do you want me to attach the original release of "The Gambit Story"?On the NRO wev site, the file is located under the GAMBIT and HEXAGON Histories link and it is the ID 6 "The Gambit Story" link. Byeman Doc. Number 140002-90 pg #. 154. When opened in Adobe Reader, the software indicates that the page number is 161.Secondly do you know what the term "OTEX" means?Yes, please post it. No, I don't know what OTEX means. JCM might.I don't know what it stands for, but it seems to be associated with smallpiggyback instruments - I might guess "Orbital Technology Experiment" or something meaningless like that...Thank you for your response to what "OTEX" might mean.
After rereading memo BYE-16762-70 (see attached file) I suspect that OTEX (whatever it was) was a regular part of G-3 based on the following quote on page 6 (when opened in Adobe Reader)."Recurring cost of the (Redacted), Redundant Roll Joint System and Redundant Attitude Control System were not effective until Flights 10, 12 and 16 respectively."My assumption is that the redacted word is OTEX since OTEX was effective on vehicle 10 as stated on page 23 (when opened in Adobe Reader) in the WHITE portion of the GAMBIT cost summary. If my assumption is correct, I do not think they would have recurring costs on every flight for experiments.
I'm overwhelmed ... Blackstar, please write us a nice short article.