Quote from: jcm on 09/03/2011 06:34 pmOh, and I note that in Varlomeev's more recent article - NK Jul 2007 No 7 p 70 - he lists the Jan 1960 flights as if they were regular 8K74 flights. That's why I am worried...My feeling is that Varfolomeyev misinterpreted the July 1958 and January 1960 launches. No documents surfaced in 15 years since his Spaceflight publications that would confirm the statements of some special tests with dummy stages.Having said that, I must add that many and many Timothy's revelations of 1994-1999 may be true while these are not confirmed up to now. For example, we have the 'official' Samara book now -- Samarskiye Stupeni Semyorki. It has multiple errors, it has some interesting documents -- on 11A57 for example -- but you would not see in it such things as 8K72 with Block Zh, 8K711, 11A55 and 11A56, 11A58 etc. first described by Varfolomeyev 15 years ago.
Oh, and I note that in Varlomeev's more recent article - NK Jul 2007 No 7 p 70 - he lists the Jan 1960 flights as if they were regular 8K74 flights. That's why I am worried...
example, we have the 'official' Samara book now -- Samarskiye Stupeni Semyorki.
My recollection of the press reports of the January 1960 tests was that they were for a long range rocket (implying ICBM testing) coming from TASS. Always learning..........
One issue with Mr. Varfolomeyev’s R-7 article part 6, is that it states the 8K78M adopted the 11S59 Semyorka packet from the 11A511 Soyuz in 1966-1967. Now according to Mr. Vovan over at the N.K. forum, the Soyuz-U introduced a Semyorka packet with a shorter instrument section; and that was the 11S59. It sounds that the Molniya started with an 8K74 R-7A derivative with blok-I powered by RD-0107, then progressed to 11A57 with RD-0108, before returning to RD-0107 and from February 1968 featured 11A511 with RD-0110. But it does not look like it progressed to an 11S59 equivalent with the shorter instrument section. http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3727&start=60http://spacemodels.nuxit.net/Soyuz/soyuz-blueprint.jpghttp://www.walkinspace.ru/photo/23-0-1745http://rutube.ru/tracks/3634127.html?v=f4e34760f30dca144531d0676fdf2c26http://www.samspace.ru/WEB/213.htm
Quote from: Stan Black on 09/14/2011 08:23 pm One issue with Mr. Varfolomeyev’s R-7 article part 6, is that it states the 8K78M adopted the 11S59 Semyorka packet from the 11A511 Soyuz in 1966-1967. Now according to Mr. Vovan over at the N.K. forum, the Soyuz-U introduced a Semyorka packet with a shorter instrument section; and that was the 11S59. It sounds that the Molniya started with an 8K74 R-7A derivative with blok-I powered by RD-0107, then progressed to 11A57 with RD-0108, before returning to RD-0107 and from February 1968 featured 11A511 with RD-0110. But it does not look like it progressed to an 11S59 equivalent with the shorter instrument section. http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3727&start=60http://spacemodels.nuxit.net/Soyuz/soyuz-blueprint.jpghttp://www.walkinspace.ru/photo/23-0-1745http://rutube.ru/tracks/3634127.html?v=f4e34760f30dca144531d0676fdf2c26http://www.samspace.ru/WEB/213.htmI thought the shorter instrument section was the difference between the 11A511 and the 11A511U? NK forum is broken for me at the moment...But yes, the 8K78 tangle gets worse the more I look at it..
Quote from: jcm on 09/15/2011 01:47 amQuote from: Stan Black on 09/14/2011 08:23 pm One issue with Mr. Varfolomeyev’s R-7 article part 6, is that it states the 8K78M adopted the 11S59 Semyorka packet from the 11A511 Soyuz in 1966-1967. Now according to Mr. Vovan over at the N.K. forum, the Soyuz-U introduced a Semyorka packet with a shorter instrument section; and that was the 11S59. It sounds that the Molniya started with an 8K74 R-7A derivative with blok-I powered by RD-0107, then progressed to 11A57 with RD-0108, before returning to RD-0107 and from February 1968 featured 11A511 with RD-0110. But it does not look like it progressed to an 11S59 equivalent with the shorter instrument section. http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3727&start=60http://spacemodels.nuxit.net/Soyuz/soyuz-blueprint.jpghttp://www.walkinspace.ru/photo/23-0-1745http://rutube.ru/tracks/3634127.html?v=f4e34760f30dca144531d0676fdf2c26http://www.samspace.ru/WEB/213.htmI thought the shorter instrument section was the difference between the 11A511 and the 11A511U? NK forum is broken for me at the moment...But yes, the 8K78 tangle gets worse the more I look at it.. I think Mr. Varfolomeyev got it slightly incorrect? Molniya and maybe Voskhod both adopted the 11A511 packet, but the 11S59 is the shorter one for Soyuz-U.Well, we’ll just have to keep waiting for part 14…http://www.cosmopark.ru/r7/prig10.htm
http://frs-vetlana.livejournal.com/222305.html
In is translation of Chertok's memoirs, Volume 2, page 449, Asif Siddiqi mentions an R-7 launch on 31st September 1959, with serial number IZ-30.Someone has a confirmation of this launch ? I found no other sources about that ?
September has only 30 days. Maybe another month?