Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)  (Read 787817 times)

Offline ChefPat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1055
  • Earth, for now
  • Liked: 125
  • Likes Given: 1022
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #820 on: 12/26/2011 01:45 am »
 
ChefPat: What was the other side of the bet?  Three weeks, or just ten days?

It's kind of a pool. The guesses range from 5 days up to 25 or so.
Everybody put in a bottle of their favorite wine.
Mine is a bottle of Chateau Ste Michelle, Columbia Valley Syrah.
Playing Politics with Commercial Crew is Un-American!!!

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #821 on: 12/26/2011 10:27 pm »
When the Falcon 9 second stage reignites, will it pass within visual range of the Dragon Capsule as it overtakes and passes the capsules position?  Seems like a great opportunity for capturing video of the Dragon and Falcon 9 second stage in operation.
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline SpacemanInSPACE

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Liked: 14
  • Likes Given: 72
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #822 on: 12/27/2011 03:31 am »
When the Falcon 9 second stage reignites, will it pass within visual range of the Dragon Capsule as it overtakes and passes the capsules position?  Seems like a great opportunity for capturing video of the Dragon and Falcon 9 second stage in operation.

I think rather the Dragon observation will be done by ISS cameras instead.
Space is worth it God Damnit!

Offline cuddihy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1251
  • Liked: 580
  • Likes Given: 940
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #823 on: 12/27/2011 03:51 am »
Wouldn't the video package and telemetry be on Dragon anyway?

On the other hand would make a good shot of the second stage possible...

Online Jorge

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6418
  • Liked: 543
  • Likes Given: 78
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #824 on: 12/27/2011 05:15 am »
When the Falcon 9 second stage reignites, will it pass within visual range of the Dragon Capsule as it overtakes and passes the capsules position?  Seems like a great opportunity for capturing video of the Dragon and Falcon 9 second stage in operation.

I think rather the Dragon observation will be done by ISS cameras instead.

Not at the time of F9 second stage reignition, it won't.
JRF

Offline ChefPat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1055
  • Earth, for now
  • Liked: 125
  • Likes Given: 1022
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #825 on: 12/27/2011 12:09 pm »
Will the Orbcom Sats be on this mission? I though I'd heard they were cancelled.
Playing Politics with Commercial Crew is Un-American!!!

Offline RocketJack

  • Member
  • Posts: 41
  • Virginia
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #826 on: 12/28/2011 01:47 am »
And with all of these delays, and lets not kid ourselves, there have been a ^@#$ton of delays, the cost to the American Taxpayer for these delays... $0

Actually, between SpaceX and Orbital, the cost has been over $200 million for additional "risk reduction" milestones.
NASA decided that... Not SpaceX... Not Orbital...


Made up milestones to funnel "keep alive" cash to the players...

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #827 on: 12/28/2011 01:54 am »
Made up milestones to funnel "keep alive" cash to the players...

Really? Can you please name the milestones and why you think they have no value? If you want to make the argument that these milestones should have been obvious at the beginning of COTS - and that argument certainly can be made for the Antares test flight - then sure, happy to agree with you, but I think NASA is getting value from these additional milestones in the form of risk reduction. You don't?
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #828 on: 12/28/2011 02:41 am »
Getting $5M for a test that cost $50k?

Whatever. It was Recovery Act money. Everything about it is sketchy. At least it went to more effective recipients than most of ARRA.
« Last Edit: 12/29/2011 03:07 am by Antares »
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #829 on: 12/28/2011 02:12 pm »
Getting $5M for a test that cost $50k?

Whatever. It was Recovery Act money. Everything about it is sketchy. At least it went to more effective recipients than most of ARRA.

It wasn't recovery act money, the COTS augmentation funds were FY 2011 funds. In any event, you have to remember that SpaceX was only getting $10 million for COTS Demo2 which means a shortfall of more than $120 million over their regular prices.
« Last Edit: 12/29/2011 12:50 pm by yg1968 »

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #830 on: 12/28/2011 09:14 pm »
Will the Orbcom Sats be on this mission? I though I'd heard they were cancelled.

You heard it right.

Quote
The updated plan includes launching the first OG2 prototype satellite on the first Cargo Re-supply Services (CRS) mission in mid-2012, followed closely by an additional launch of two OG2 satellites into a high inclination orbit as a secondary payload in late 2012. In early 2013, SpaceX plans to launch eight to twelve OG2 satellites, and the remainder of the constellation of 18 OG2 satellites is expected to be launched in 2014. All launches are expected to be on Falcon 9 rockets.


http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20111228005553/en/ORBCOMM-SpaceX-Improve-Launch-Plans-OG2-Satellites

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #831 on: 12/28/2011 09:23 pm »
Thanks ugordon. It's discouraging to read this quote:

Quote
"We are excited to put ORBCOMM's second generation satellites into orbit as scheduled, in the most desirable inclinations with the least amount of risk." said Elon Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX. "ORBCOMM has been a great partner and we are looking forward to launch."

If that quote was received when asking about this change, as it is purported in the article to be, then boy oh boy is that a weasel thing to say. A good journalist* would ask a followup question to request an answer as to why there is no ORBCOMMs on the upcoming Feb launch, when the decision was made, what will take their place, etc.

* I know, sorry about the coffee on your keyboard.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline hop

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
  • Liked: 553
  • Likes Given: 891
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #832 on: 12/28/2011 10:06 pm »
If that quote was received when asking about this change, as it is purported in the article to be, then boy oh boy is that a weasel thing to say. A good journalist* would ask a followup question to request an answer as to why there is no ORBCOMMs on the upcoming Feb launch
It's a press release, written by the PR department, no journalists or questions is involved.

Doesn't shed much light on the real story, though does it ? If NASA isn't OK having them on COTS, what's different about CRS  ? More time to analyze ? Changes to mission that require development ? Or is it totally unrelated, e.g payloads not ready ?

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #833 on: 12/28/2011 10:09 pm »
If NASA isn't OK having them on COTS, what's different about CRS  ? More time to analyze ? Changes to mission that require development ?

One (or two) more datapoint on F9 performance and injection accuracy.

Offline baldusi

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8371
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Liked: 2555
  • Likes Given: 8364
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #834 on: 12/28/2011 10:33 pm »
Will the Orbcom Sats be on this mission? I though I'd heard they were cancelled.

You heard it right.

Quote
The updated plan includes launching the first OG2 prototype satellite on the first Cargo Re-supply Services (CRS) mission in mid-2012, followed closely by an additional launch of two OG2 satellites into a high inclination orbit as a secondary payload in late 2012. In early 2013, SpaceX plans to launch eight to twelve OG2 satellites, and the remainder of the constellation of 18 OG2 satellites is expected to be launched in 2014. All launches are expected to be on Falcon 9 rockets.


http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20111228005553/en/ORBCOMM-SpaceX-Improve-Launch-Plans-OG2-Satellites
You know the funny thing? In Spanish speaking countries the equivalent of April's Fool is today.  ::)

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #835 on: 12/28/2011 10:54 pm »
Getting $5M for a test that cost $50k?

Whatever. It was Recovery Act money. Everything about it is sketchy. At least it went to more effective recipients than most of ARRA.

It wasn't recovery act money, the COTS augmentation funds were FY 2011 funds. In any event, you have to remember that SpaceX was only getting 10 million for COTS2 which means a shortfall of more than $120 million over their regular prices.

Spacex did receive recovery moneys

Offline MP99

Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #836 on: 12/29/2011 11:27 am »
Quote
The updated plan includes launching the first OG2 prototype satellite on the first Cargo Re-supply Services (CRS) mission in mid-2012, followed closely by an additional launch of two OG2 satellites into a high inclination orbit as a secondary payload in late 2012. In early 2013, SpaceX plans to launch eight to twelve OG2 satellites, and the remainder of the constellation of 18 OG2 satellites is expected to be launched in 2014. All launches are expected to be on Falcon 9 rockets.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20111228005553/en/ORBCOMM-SpaceX-Improve-Launch-Plans-OG2-Satellites

The manifest shows only two CRS flights from KSC and an MDA flight from Vandenburg. Presumably "high inclination" means these will be secondaries on that Vandenburg launch rather than CRS #2.

cheers, Martin

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #837 on: 12/29/2011 12:45 pm »
Getting $5M for a test that cost $50k?

Whatever. It was Recovery Act money. Everything about it is sketchy. At least it went to more effective recipients than most of ARRA.

It wasn't recovery act money, the COTS augmentation funds were FY 2011 funds. In any event, you have to remember that SpaceX was only getting 10 million for COTS2 which means a shortfall of more than $120 million over their regular prices.

Spacex did receive recovery moneys

For infrastructure upgrades (as you have mentionned before) but the COTS Augmentation funds were from the FY2011 funds.

P.S. Incidentally, I found a few links on the infrastructure upgrades to launch complex 40 that were funded by the Recovery Act:
http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency/RecipientReportedData/Pages/RecipientProjectSummary508.aspx?AwardIDSUR=80510&qtr=2009Q4
http://www.recovery.gov/FAQ/Documents/NASA_Weekly_Financial_and_Activity_Report_20100507.xls
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/spacexdemoflight.html

Quote
Kennedy worked with Space Florida to acquire several high-pressure tanks and dewars from the Santa Susana Field Laboratory in California for SpaceX and other COTS partners. Government Recovery Act funds were used to complete Launch Complex-40 upgrades. The lightning towers, power substation, facilities and conductive floor for the integration facility were upgraded or repaired to improve reliability.

 
« Last Edit: 12/29/2011 01:46 pm by yg1968 »

Offline Jason1701

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2232
  • Liked: 70
  • Likes Given: 152
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #838 on: 12/29/2011 01:40 pm »
The manifest shows only two CRS flights from KSC and an MDA flight from Vandenburg. Presumably "high inclination" means these will be secondaries on that Vandenburg launch rather than CRS #2.

That makes sense, as the MDA payload is very light.

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #839 on: 12/29/2011 02:00 pm »
The manifest shows only two CRS flights from KSC and an MDA flight from Vandenburg. Presumably "high inclination" means these will be secondaries on that Vandenburg launch rather than CRS #2.

That makes sense, as the MDA payload is very light.

That's a good point.  Originally, the Cassiope mission was going to be launched from CCAFS, so a light payload was needed som more dV could be dedicated to the dogleg turn.  Launching from VAFB takes that requirement away so there is room for secondaries.

The only question is: What is the destination inclination of the ORBCOMM constellation? If it was planned to launch them from CCAFS as a secondary payload, would it be practical to do the same from VAFB?
« Last Edit: 12/29/2011 02:01 pm by Ben the Space Brit »
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1