Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)  (Read 787834 times)

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #300 on: 10/22/2011 10:55 pm »
Last time (COTS demo 1), does anyone remember how long it took from Dragon arriving at the Cape

Aug 4.

Offline balan h20

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Christiansburg, VA
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #301 on: 10/23/2011 01:50 am »
It is an oversize load and may not ve allowed to travel at night in some states. Different states have different requirements when it comes to oversized loads being transported through thier states and the permiting process that they have to follow as to routes and hours of travel.

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #302 on: 10/23/2011 02:41 am »
That's not really what I asked, but interesting anyway.

I think it was something like 2-3 months last time. Not sure, it could be less. And it may be slightly less or slightly more this time.

This Dragon capsule is as almost as different from COTS1 and COTS1 was from the Qualification Unit that rode up on F9F1.

I don't think how log COTS1 took to prepair has much of any significance to how long COTS2/3 is going to take
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #303 on: 10/23/2011 03:07 am »
Can someone explain the separation line running around the middle of the COTS 2/3 capsule? It does not appear in the COTS 1 capsule. Will molding of some kind fill that space in?
« Last Edit: 10/23/2011 03:07 am by mr. mark »

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #304 on: 10/23/2011 03:10 am »
The blue-and-white paint scheme makes me wonder, did SpaceX buy their own truck?
Probably.  It would make sense considering how often they are shipping stuff back and fourth from Hawthorne to their test site.  Plus they can go pick up CNC machines or all kinds of random things like raw goods.  Usually oversize loads have special requirements for horse-power per axle and things like that too (at least up here), and renting the beefy engined trucks is very expensive.  But I don't really know in this case if they need a special truck because I am sure those stages are a lot lighter than mining and oilfield equipment that I am more used to dealing with (mostly in a different country). 

Either way, the expense of owning vs. renting a semi also needs to factor in the time staff are waiting on things.  For example, if 20 engineers and techs are waiting for an extra hour or two while the rental guy gets organized and shows up, or while someone calls around to find an available rig, the waiting can be frustrating, and intangibly expensive.  If the cost of renting vs. owning is similar, it is generally better to own (control).  Vertical Integration...
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #305 on: 10/23/2011 03:17 am »
The blue-and-white paint scheme makes me wonder, did SpaceX buy their own truck?
Probably.  It would make sense considering how often they are shipping stuff back and fourth from Hawthorne to their test site.  Plus they can go pick up CNC machines or all kinds of random things like raw goods.  Usually oversize loads have special requirements for horse-power per axle and things like that too (at least up here), and renting the beefy engined trucks is very expensive.  But I don't really know in this case if they need a special truck because I am sure those stages are a lot lighter than mining and oilfield equipment that I am more used to dealing with (mostly in a different country). 

Either way, the expense of owning vs. renting a semi also needs to factor in the time staff are waiting on things.  For example, if 20 engineers and techs are waiting for an extra hour or two while the rental guy gets organized and shows up, or while someone calls around to find an available rig, the waiting can be frustrating, and intangibly expensive.  If the cost of renting vs. owning is similar, it is generally better to own (control).  Vertical Integration...

All that says rental.  They don't transport often enough

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #306 on: 10/23/2011 03:49 am »
All that says rental.  They don't transport often enough

Used to work for a rental company.  For a good enough customer we would paint a truck pink polka dots.  I agree with Jim, they will definitely know weeks in advance of any time they are going to need a truck.  Allow the rental agency to keep the truck busy 24/7 and for a small retainer fee, they will make sure your nice blue and white truck will be there hours in advance, with your favorite driver team, and all routing handled for much less than it takes to handle such things yourself.

Think I remember one time seeing the figure at my current job that if a trailer sits idle for 2 weeks a year it's cheaper to just lease the hardware and staff.
« Last Edit: 10/23/2011 03:50 am by SpacexULA »
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #307 on: 10/23/2011 03:58 am »
It's great that SpaceX can rent a truck like that. Much cheaper than a dedicated truck (and even more cheaper than a dedicated ship, like ULA has EDIT:ULA has a ship it rents, but gets first dibs on it, thanks Antares). Vertical integration is good if you can keep the equipment and staff busy all the time, otherwise it's a waste if you have the option of renting.
« Last Edit: 10/23/2011 04:11 am by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #308 on: 10/23/2011 04:04 am »
(and even more cheaper than a dedicated ship, like ULA has)

Google Delta Mariner.  It's not owned by ULA and has been used by Foss Maritime to ship many other things.  ULA has first dibs on it before other customers.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #309 on: 10/23/2011 04:10 am »
(and even more cheaper than a dedicated ship, like ULA has)

Google Delta Mariner.  It's not owned by ULA and has been used by Foss Maritime to ship many other things.  ULA has first dibs on it before other customers.
I stand corrected!
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline dragon44

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 108
  • Liked: 22
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #310 on: 10/23/2011 04:51 am »
Can someone explain the separation line running around the middle of the COTS 2/3 capsule? It does not appear in the COTS 1 capsule. Will molding of some kind fill that space in?

Don't know, but here are some pics to compare.

C2 in the factory. Looks like there is a ridge there. Also, the filling between the panels in red (which might look like a gap in the picture you are referring to)
http://www.spacex.com/assets/img/20110815-002.jpg

For comparison, C1 also had red filling before launch.
http://www.spacex.com/assets/img/20101001_dragonc1.jpg

But it was white by recovery. Not sure if replaced or painted.
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/DSC_4747.jpg

Offline balan h20

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Christiansburg, VA
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #311 on: 10/23/2011 02:34 pm »
How they move this stuff around on site. Seems to me that you need to move it around the factory and test areas. Tractor is versatal piece of equipment and hooks to a wide variety of trailers making it a good investment for a company this large I have worked with smaller ones that had three or four. Trailers are not that expensive and have low overhead. They may be special ordered for some of the pieces that they need to move and wont be found at rental agencies so that would put them as a bought piec of equipment and a good investment since then you can insure it is capable of hualing your equipment at a moments notice and has all its licence and certificates. For a company as large as SpaceX a small fleet of tractors and traliers is a drop in the bucket for insuring that you have proper transportation for your product.

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #312 on: 10/23/2011 03:24 pm »
How they move this stuff around on site. Seems to me that you need to move it around the factory and test areas. Tractor is versatal piece of equipment and hooks to a wide variety of trailers making it a good investment for a company this large I have worked with smaller ones that had three or four. Trailers are not that expensive and have low overhead. They may be special ordered for some of the pieces that they need to move and wont be found at rental agencies so that would put them as a bought piec of equipment and a good investment since then you can insure it is capable of hualing your equipment at a moments notice and has all its licence and certificates. For a company as large as SpaceX a small fleet of tractors and traliers is a drop in the bucket for insuring that you have proper transportation for your product.


With SpaceX's requirement for extremely time critical transport from 3 logistics points, the vast majority of which are HUGE insurance liability issues 1 way, and normal freight the other, it makes perfect since for them to own the trailers, but no since at all for them to own the tractors/drivers.

Only time it makes since to own trailers/drivers is when you are carrying cargo both ways on a daily basis and at a very predictable/scalable pace.

1 tractor would not cut it, and 3 you would have your staff spend the majority of their time with nothing to do.

5 will get you 10 it’s SpaceX owned Trailers moved by a contract logistics firm.
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline krytek

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 535
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #313 on: 10/23/2011 03:59 pm »
How they move this stuff around on site. Seems to me that you need to move it around the factory and test areas. Tractor is versatal piece of equipment and hooks to a wide variety of trailers making it a good investment for a company this large I have worked with smaller ones that had three or four. Trailers are not that expensive and have low overhead. They may be special ordered for some of the pieces that they need to move and wont be found at rental agencies so that would put them as a bought piec of equipment and a good investment since then you can insure it is capable of hualing your equipment at a moments notice and has all its licence and certificates. For a company as large as SpaceX a small fleet of tractors and traliers is a drop in the bucket for insuring that you have proper transportation for your product.


With SpaceX's requirement for extremely time critical transport from 3 logistics points, the vast majority of which are HUGE insurance liability issues 1 way, and normal freight the other, it makes perfect since for them to own the trailers, but no since at all for them to own the tractors/drivers.

Only time it makes since to own trailers/drivers is when you are carrying cargo both ways on a daily basis and at a very predictable/scalable pace.

1 tractor would not cut it, and 3 you would have your staff spend the majority of their time with nothing to do.

5 will get you 10 it’s SpaceX owned Trailers moved by a contract logistics firm.


Unless you qualify existing employees to do most of these stuff.
So an engineer or a technician becomes a truck driver for a few hours (licences don't cost that much money). 
I personally have a truck, tractor and forklift licenses in addition my main
occupation.
« Last Edit: 10/23/2011 05:17 pm by krytek »

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8894
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60677
  • Likes Given: 1333
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #314 on: 10/23/2011 05:25 pm »
All that says rental.  They don't transport often enough

Used to work for a rental company.  For a good enough customer we would paint a truck pink polka dots.  I agree with Jim, they will definitely know weeks in advance of any time they are going to need a truck.  Allow the rental agency to keep the truck busy 24/7 and for a small retainer fee, they will make sure your nice blue and white truck will be there hours in advance, with your favorite driver team, and all routing handled for much less than it takes to handle such things yourself.

Think I remember one time seeing the figure at my current job that if a trailer sits idle for 2 weeks a year it's cheaper to just lease the hardware and staff.

That's more than a little hard to believe. Leasing a low boy flatbed every week for a year would cost more than buying one with any contract I've ever seen. The same with tractors. Our truck drivers don't just sit around drinking coffee, waiting for the next disaster to hit. They're also the mechanics and welders that keep everything else going. It's the difference between a company with motivated employees and a union gravy train operation that has to hire seperate people for every little job.
 And a company the scale of SpaceX is going to have a lot more jobs for their trucks than just moving rockets and capsules around.
 It would cost us $3-4,000 to lease a tractor cross country every time we needed it and save us the $45,000 we spent for a used Freightliner. Not much of a deal there.
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #315 on: 10/23/2011 05:57 pm »
Oversized trucking is not a skill that shared among other skills.  There is also working the state permits.  This is a task for a xportation firm and not an aerospace contractor.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #316 on: 10/23/2011 06:03 pm »
And it's also not the topic of this thread.

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #317 on: 10/24/2011 12:43 am »
Here's a picture for you guys, from SpaceX's facebook page:
4 Dragons!
It shows COTS demo 1 Dragon, the one that just shipped out, and two other Dragons in various stages of assembly.

A spacecraft production line is a beautiful thing!  :)

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7253
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2079
  • Likes Given: 2005
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #318 on: 10/24/2011 01:04 am »
And it's also not the topic of this thread.

Would love to see some of this discussion take place here:
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=26738
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline starsilk

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 686
  • Denver
  • Liked: 268
  • Likes Given: 115
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #319 on: 10/24/2011 03:37 am »
Here's a picture for you guys, from SpaceX's facebook page:
4 Dragons!
It shows COTS demo 1 Dragon, the one that just shipped out, and two other Dragons in various stages of assembly.

trivia: that's either a wing, a flight, a flock, or a clan of dragons...

personally I like 'clan' (supposedly because they were considered to be sentient beings, google tells me).

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0