Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)  (Read 787802 times)

Offline kch

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1758
  • Liked: 496
  • Likes Given: 8804
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1080 on: 01/17/2012 06:56 pm »
The indefinite delay quality of this announcement is what reminds me of the F9-01 FTS saga all over again.

I'm lost in acronym hell. What does 'FTS' stand for again?

Flight termination system.

That too ... ;)

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1081 on: 01/17/2012 07:17 pm »
Jones doesn't seem to be a fan of commercial crew or of Obama:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/space/nasa/4344602


Quote
After the shuttle orbiters retire late this year, American astronauts will rent seats on Russian rockets headed to the ISS. We won't field an alternative spacecraft for five years or more. The president will instead farm out the nation's access to low Earth orbit to commercial firms. None of the rockets NASA has contracted to deliver cargo to the ISS has flown, and betting our nation's sole access to space on industry's ability to replicate fifty years of NASA experience on the fly is unwise. NASA should fly a new crewed spacecraft as quickly as possible, then move to commercial firms once they have a proven record of reliable cargo services.


What's the point of linking this two year old article here in this thread now?

You may not like his tone or his perscription but even today, nearly two years later, this statement still pretty much holds true. 

I find that it's important to understand a person's bias. So I linked the article as background information to his comments on SpaceX and on commercial cargo and crew in general. I don't disagree with most of what he said in the video. But to indicate that this delay could suggest that a mistake in strategy was made is going a bit far.
« Last Edit: 01/17/2012 07:30 pm by yg1968 »

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1082 on: 01/17/2012 07:52 pm »
Sorry for being a little late in responding but thanks Chris for an excellent article regarding the delay of launch. It seems that NASA will continue it's excellent record of safety post shuttle RTF and that degree of safety is now being passed onto commercial vehicles visiting the ISS as well.

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1083 on: 01/17/2012 11:16 pm »
Jones doesn't seem to be a fan of commercial crew or of Obama:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/space/nasa/4344602


Quote
After the shuttle orbiters retire late this year, American astronauts will rent seats on Russian rockets headed to the ISS. We won't field an alternative spacecraft for five years or more. The president will instead farm out the nation's access to low Earth orbit to commercial firms. None of the rockets NASA has contracted to deliver cargo to the ISS has flown, and betting our nation's sole access to space on industry's ability to replicate fifty years of NASA experience on the fly is unwise. NASA should fly a new crewed spacecraft as quickly as possible, then move to commercial firms once they have a proven record of reliable cargo services.


What's the point of linking this two year old article here in this thread now?

You may not like his tone or his perscription but even today, nearly two years later, this statement still pretty much holds true. 

I find that it's important to understand a person's bias. So I linked the article as background information to his comments on SpaceX and on commercial cargo and crew in general. I don't disagree with most of what he said in the video. But to indicate that this delay could suggest that a mistake in strategy was made is going a bit far.

I see.  I find that quite funny actually, given your bias, that you feel supposedly "anti-commercial" people need to be outed and shown to be something they are not.  When you do the same but from just a different perspective by running around throughout the forum shouting how more government money should be given to commercial at every opportunity and that, generally speaking, everything else is wrong and Obama was "oh so right" on everything. 

The statement above is quite correct and a very bad strategy has been put in motion that we will take years to recover, if ever.  He did not say he was against commercial but, instead, just a smarter implimentation. 
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1084 on: 01/18/2012 12:09 am »
I see.  I find that quite funny actually, given your bias, that you feel supposedly "anti-commercial" people need to be outed and shown to be something they are not.  When you do the same but from just a different perspective by running around throughout the forum shouting how more government money should be given to commercial at every opportunity and that, generally speaking, everything else is wrong and Obama was "oh so right" on everything. 

The statement above is quite correct and a very bad strategy has been put in motion that we will take years to recover, if ever.  He did not say he was against commercial but, instead, just a smarter implimentation. 

I never said that he was anti-commercial. But he does have a bias as most people do. So I linked the other article as background information on this bias. That's all.

As far as my own bias, I admit that I am pro-commercial (and pro-business in general). I consider myself center right like you. But if Obama proposes something that is pro-business and pro-commercial, I will defend it. I was glad to see that some Republicans such as Newt Gingrich defended Obama's space policy when it originally came out. I am also glad to see that the Tea in Space movement agrees with Obama's space policy. Having said all that, I am sure that SpaceX appreciates the help that they have been getting from NASA for this flight.
« Last Edit: 01/18/2012 12:13 am by yg1968 »

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1085 on: 01/18/2012 12:17 am »
No, you said that anyone who says where we are at today is a mistake, that is "going too far".  Sounds like your are trying to suggest something to me.....

The TPiS says a lot of buzzwords, nothing more, unless they trying to lay blame at something.  Never have they given a real strategy that does not center around subjective buzzwords.

It is the same with Obama.  A lot of buzzwords to make it sound great.  Obama made it sound like "commercial" was here and ready.  Obama's supposed space policy is more (even though it is actually less) than just "going commercial".

From a policy and strategic perspective, if anyone of these groups, REALLY believed what they have said about commercial, they would have done better to establish possible market drivers for space, first on ISS.  They would have secured ISS and provided a transition.  "Hope and change" is not a plan. 

By the way, Newt now says our policy is a disaster.  In theory, it could have been something if it was just tweaked a little with something real but the it was all smoke and mirrors and clearly we are where we are now, nowhere, because of it. 
« Last Edit: 01/18/2012 12:20 am by OV-106 »
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7253
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2079
  • Likes Given: 2005
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1086 on: 01/18/2012 01:02 am »
Quote from: OV-106
Obama made it sound like "commercial" was here and ready. 

Yes, but these words didn't come from Obama: For cargo transport to the Space Station after 2010, NASA will rely on existing or new commercial cargo transport systems, as well as international partner cargo transport systems.

That comes from the 2004 Vision for Space Exploration, page 15.  The President then was George W. Bush; the NASA Administrator was Sean O'Keefe.  We've been waiting for the equivalent of COTS Demo 3 for eight years; we can wait just a little bit longer.
« Last Edit: 01/18/2012 02:32 am by sdsds »
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1087 on: 01/18/2012 01:10 am »
Obama made it sound like "commercial" was here and ready. 

Yes, but these words didn't come from Obama: For cargo transport to the Space Station after 2010, NASA will rely on existing or new commercial cargo transport systems, as well as international partner cargo transport systems.

That comes from the 2004 Vision for Space Exploration, page 15.  The President then was George W. Bush; the NASA Administrator was Sean O'Keefe.  We've been waiting for the equivalent of COTS Demo 3 for eight years; we can wait just a little bit longer.

And that statement, as you mentioned, was made in 2004.  We had 6 years until 2010 at that point.  We are now two years beyond it and really do not know when the first delivery will be made.

"We can wait a little longer" is naive all the while Rome burns.  For the current president, who was annointed as this great leader, he could have made things different and better by actually providing a true strategy and transition.  After all, that would have been going "against" Bush, which is all that really matters.

For someone who claims to be such a NASA supporter, and the fact he IS the current president, HAS BEEN for 3 years, I think it is more than fair to hold him accountable. 

Please do not try to lecture me that the CURRENT administration did not make it sound like "commercial" was here and ready and just NASA and their old space shuttle just needed to get out of the way, and some companies, like SpaceX, were not baiting that on, making promises, etc about how wonderful it would be.

We're still waiting. 
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Offline Carl G

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1140
  • Liked: 260
  • Likes Given: 140
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1088 on: 01/18/2012 02:29 am »
This thread needs to stay on topic.

The thread has been trimmed slightly.

(Chris - Note that the thread wasn't too off topic. Someone was in the mainstream media talking about the delay in a wider ranging fashion, so it's understandable. Best it goes back to the specific topic as from now on).
« Last Edit: 01/18/2012 12:26 pm by Chris Bergin »

Offline Andy USA

  • Lead Moderator
  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1030
  • Los Angeles, California
  • Liked: 207
  • Likes Given: 256
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1089 on: 01/19/2012 03:17 am »
Four more posts that have absolutely nothing to do with this mission.

Removed.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1090 on: 01/19/2012 09:10 pm »
If this tweet is to be believed, the new tentative date is March 20.

If true, allow me to quote myself:

T-2 months and holding...

« Last Edit: 01/19/2012 09:13 pm by ugordan »

Offline Space Pete

Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1091 on: 01/19/2012 09:22 pm »
If this tweet is to be believed, the new tentative date is March 20.

Makes sense, as that would be the day after the ATV-3 docking.
NASASpaceflight ISS Writer

Offline Olaf

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3124
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1481
  • Likes Given: 455
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1092 on: 01/19/2012 10:32 pm »
But from March 16 to March 31 there is only one US Astronaut on the ISS.
That means no chance for berthing Dragon.

Offline Space Pete

Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1093 on: 01/19/2012 10:37 pm »
But from March 16 to March 31 there is only one US Astronaut on the ISS.
That means no chance for berthing Dragon.

True - good point.
NASASpaceflight ISS Writer

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1094 on: 01/19/2012 10:39 pm »
If there is truly only one US astronaut on board the ISS at that time it would seem not likely a launch would take place during that time period. Possibly just a place holder if anything. I would not put too much into this until an official announcement is made.
« Last Edit: 01/19/2012 10:42 pm by mr. mark »

Offline Space Pete

Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1095 on: 01/19/2012 11:01 pm »
Following the 16th March undocking of Soyuz TMA-22 (which will reduce ISS to 3 crew), the next Soyuz docking is TMA-04M on 1st April (which will restore ISS to 6 crew).

Most of April is clear of activity on ISS, and so April would seem like a plausible timeframe for launch, assuming SpaceX can be ready by then.
NASASpaceflight ISS Writer

Offline Space Pete

Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1096 on: 01/19/2012 11:24 pm »
From ISS On-Orbit Status Report for 19/01/2012.

CDR Dan Burbank spent several hours on updating the spare CUCU (COTS UHF Communications Unit) which he had installed in ER-6 (ExPrESS Rack-6) on 01/11. [Telemetry contention prevented the ground from completing the post-update ground checkout of the Spare CUCU and subsequent reconfig back to the Primary CUCU today. The software update config gear is being cleaned up by the ground, and both CUCUs are left powered off overnight for finishing up the final checkouts and reconfig tomorrow afternoon. Final config will leave the Prime CUCU powered on for continued performance characterization by SpaceX.]
NASASpaceflight ISS Writer

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1097 on: 01/20/2012 04:21 am »
Space Pete, I know you have been keeping up with software developments. I believe the beginning of February was the time that they thought software updates would be complete. If you could, Please keep us posted when all software updates have been completed.

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12192
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18491
  • Likes Given: 12560
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1098 on: 01/20/2012 06:12 am »
But from March 16 to March 31 there is only one US Astronaut on the ISS.
That means no chance for berthing Dragon.

True - good point.
Question:
Why would there have to more than one US astronaut on ISS for berthing Dragon?

Online Jorge

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6418
  • Liked: 543
  • Likes Given: 78
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2/3 Updates (THREAD 2)
« Reply #1099 on: 01/20/2012 07:52 am »
But from March 16 to March 31 there is only one US Astronaut on the ISS.
That means no chance for berthing Dragon.

True - good point.
Question:
Why would there have to more than one US astronaut on ISS for berthing Dragon?

Freeflyer capture is a two-person job and only US crewmembers are trained on Dragon.
JRF

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0