Author Topic: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)  (Read 353509 times)

Offline Tea Party Space Czar

  • President, Tea Party in Space
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
  • TEA Party in Space Czar
  • Washington DC
  • Liked: 294
  • Likes Given: 284
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #740 on: 09/03/2012 03:12 am »
Bigelow is hiring again:

http://www.lvrj.com/business/nasa-contracts-benefit-north-las-vegas-outfit-164988796.html

Respectfully,
Andrew Gasser
TEA Party in Space

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17528
  • Liked: 7266
  • Likes Given: 3114
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #741 on: 09/05/2012 07:48 pm »
http://www.lvrj.com/business/nasa-contracts-benefit-north-las-vegas-outfit-164988796.html

Covers Bigelow, SpaceX, SNC

This story was already linked when it came out about a month ago.

Offline Orbital Debris

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 291
  • Glad to be out of Vegas
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #742 on: 09/11/2012 01:13 am »
Do they have inflatable material that will hold water in space that will still be drinkable?
They have done some prototypes on bags for containing water around the periphery of the interior of the spacecraft.  I don't think they settled on a satisfactory design.  It is difficult to model shielding thickness of water if you just velcro a bunch of CWC's to the interior of the hull.

As pointed out, there are quite a few existing designs, but attachment and geometry may not be suitable.  The challenge for long term storage is using a biocide to prevent microbial growth. 

Storage on the outside is not practical if you want to be able to access the water. 


As for microbial growth, make use of the natural elements that you have.
1) keep it as ice (though you will need a slight amount of iodine in there since some bacteria does grow on ice).
2) even better is slowly pump water to the outer edge to take advantage of the radiation.
My personal preference would be to keep things a simple as possible: Inject a little biocide and velcro it to the interior wall.  Pumps and piping add complexity, angular momentum, and peturbations which has to be counteracted. 
 

Offline BrightLight

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1381
  • Northern New Mexico
  • Liked: 312
  • Likes Given: 953
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #743 on: 09/11/2012 08:02 pm »
A thin coating on the inside of the "bag" with a metal such as silver or gold would help with ionizing radiation shielding and act as a biocide.

Offline Orbital Debris

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 291
  • Glad to be out of Vegas
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #744 on: 10/12/2012 03:55 am »
Attached video shows water testing at the Bigelow test tank.  Following this test, the personnel at Bigelow got impatient waiting on the rented crane, so they used their own and broke their crane because they forgot to take into account the dynamic loading.

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #745 on: 10/12/2012 03:41 pm »
Attached video shows water testing at the Bigelow test tank.  Following this test, the personnel at Bigelow got impatient waiting on the rented crane, so they used their own and broke their crane because they forgot to take into account the dynamic loading.


when did this test take place?
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline Orbital Debris

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 291
  • Glad to be out of Vegas
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #746 on: 10/12/2012 07:30 pm »
The intro on the NASA video indicates that the testing took place between Oct 1-5.  The crane seen in the video around 00:44 would be a larger rented crane that they used for some of the tests.  The Bigelow crane is a smaller extendable boom.  The information that I got indicated that Bigelow crane was broken during testing on October 4.

Offline happyflower

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 202
  • Earth
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 51
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #747 on: 10/30/2012 08:16 pm »
I understand that A Bigelow BA-330 is going to launch on a Falcon 9 (dont know which flavor) in 2015. Also that the SLS program is talking to Bigelow about putting a BA-330 in space as well.

Nothing more is stated anyplace in Bigelow, SLS, and SpaceX sites. Anybody here have any additional information about these launches?

Any links for reading will be appreciated.

Thanks.

Offline Nate_Trost

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
  • Liked: 47
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #748 on: 10/30/2012 08:25 pm »
Hint: don't hold your breath.

I'm rather skeptical Bigelow will ever launch a human-habitable module, unless in the next couple years actual customers materialize who are willing to write a few hundred million dollars worth of checks.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #749 on: 10/30/2012 08:58 pm »
Hint: don't hold your breath.

I'm rather skeptical Bigelow will ever launch a human-habitable module, unless in the next couple years actual customers materialize who are willing to write a few hundred million dollars worth of checks.

The most realistic option is Bigelow will fly a small demo-module to ISS, maybe even small enough to fit in the trunk of Dragon (!). It'd be used to give the astronauts extra room, possible for disposal as well. Not super exciting, but still cool, IMHO.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #750 on: 10/30/2012 08:59 pm »
Hint: don't hold your breath.

I'm rather skeptical Bigelow will ever launch a human-habitable module, unless in the next couple years actual customers materialize who are willing to write a few hundred million dollars worth of checks.

What's skeptical about that?

People don't launch anything unless someone is writing the checks.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline happyflower

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 202
  • Earth
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 51
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #751 on: 10/30/2012 10:33 pm »
Well Bigelow does have two completed propulsion systems for the Sundancers that are no more so they can be adjusted to the BA 330's. So basically Bigelow has two BA 330s that are almost space ready anyway. Doesnt sound to me like Bigelow is waiting for somebody to write him a check to get going. Sounds to me that he is waiting for a delivery system for his space station more than anything else.

http://bemannte-raumfahrt.blogspot.com/2011/12/robert-bigelow-talks-about-ba-330-ba.html

Bigelow talks about that in the 4th video.

Offline Orbital Debris

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 291
  • Glad to be out of Vegas
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #752 on: 10/30/2012 11:30 pm »
Well Bigelow does have two completed propulsion systems for the Sundancers that are no more so they can be adjusted to the BA 330's. So basically Bigelow has two BA 330s that are almost space ready anyway.

The aft propulsion systems were the only ones delivered, and those were hard piped to fit the Sundancer aft end which was much smaller than the comparable part on a BA330.  It was undersized for SunnyD, so to use it for BA330 would be like using a lawnmower to drive a bus.

RTB has videos on the web about aliens helping to discover new elements, and I would put just as much credence in them as anything he says about being ready to go anytime soon.
« Last Edit: 11/01/2012 01:15 am by Orbital Debris »

Offline Orbital Debris

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 291
  • Glad to be out of Vegas
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #753 on: 10/30/2012 11:32 pm »
Hint: don't hold your breath.

I'm rather skeptical Bigelow will ever launch a human-habitable module, unless in the next couple years actual customers materialize who are willing to write a few hundred million dollars worth of checks.

The most realistic option is Bigelow will fly a small demo-module to ISS, maybe even small enough to fit in the trunk of Dragon (!). It'd be used to give the astronauts extra room, possible for disposal as well. Not super exciting, but still cool, IMHO.
This is much more likely to happen in the near future.  Contract is still under negotiation.

Offline Robert Thompson

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1177
  • Liked: 101
  • Likes Given: 658
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #754 on: 10/31/2012 03:41 am »
Hint: don't hold your breath.

I'm rather skeptical Bigelow will ever launch a human-habitable module, unless in the next couple years actual customers materialize who are willing to write a few hundred million dollars worth of checks.

The most realistic option is Bigelow will fly a small demo-module to ISS, maybe even small enough to fit in the trunk of Dragon (!). It'd be used to give the astronauts extra room, possible for disposal as well. Not super exciting, but still cool, IMHO.
I'd love to see this development because many post Constellation DRAs assume small inflatable surface / lander habitats. And then it can only help the cause to have a broad range in volume of modular, redundant, minimum-survival environments for the hardest location, deep space.

Technical question: Can an inflatable habitat like a BA330 be deflated to the point of relaxation of the outer surfaces, left for some time in hard radiation as if mothballed, and then re-inflated to full pressure?

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6502
  • Liked: 4617
  • Likes Given: 5340
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #755 on: 10/31/2012 06:28 pm »
RTB has videos on the web about aliens helping to discover new elements, and I would put just as much credence in them as anything he says about being ready to go anytime soon.

Owch.  If your's wasn't the voice of experience, some would call this an attack.  From you it's just a sad observation.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline BrightLight

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1381
  • Northern New Mexico
  • Liked: 312
  • Likes Given: 953
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #756 on: 10/31/2012 06:52 pm »
Hint: don't hold your breath.

I'm rather skeptical Bigelow will ever launch a human-habitable module, unless in the next couple years actual customers materialize who are willing to write a few hundred million dollars worth of checks.

The most realistic option is Bigelow will fly a small demo-module to ISS, maybe even small enough to fit in the trunk of Dragon (!). It'd be used to give the astronauts extra room, possible for disposal as well. Not super exciting, but still cool, IMHO.
This is much more likely to happen in the near future.  Contract is still under negotiation.

How long has the negotiations been going on?
as for the BA330 - Does Bigelow have a actual packaging and transport plan to get the module to a LV provider?

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7772
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 397
  • Likes Given: 822
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #757 on: 10/31/2012 06:54 pm »
Technical question: Can an inflatable habitat like a BA330 be deflated to the point of relaxation of the outer surfaces, left for some time in hard radiation as if mothballed, and then re-inflated to full pressure?

Why would you want to do that?
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Offline happyflower

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 202
  • Earth
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 51
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #758 on: 10/31/2012 10:33 pm »
Well Bigelow does have two completed propulsion systems for the Sundancers that are no more so they can be adjusted to the BA 330's. So basically Bigelow has two BA 330s that are almost space ready anyway.

The aft propulsions systems were the only ones delivered, and those were hard piped to fit the Sundancer aft end which was much smaller than the comparable part on a BA330.  It was undersized for SunnyD, so to use it for BA330 would be like using a lawnmower to drive a bus.

RTB has videos on the web about aliens helping to discover new elements, and I would put just as much credence in them as anything he says about being ready to go anytime soon.

You are probably correct and I wont argue the point. But what I was trying to say is that I dont think Mr. Bigelow is hard up for cash. He started with about 700 million dollars and by all accounts he hasnt spent more than 200 million. So he is still sitting on a large sum of cash.

I still think his issue isnt money, but a launch vehicle that can support him.

Offline spectre9

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2403
  • Australia
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 68
Re: Bigelow Aerospace Update Thread (2)
« Reply #759 on: 10/31/2012 11:31 pm »
Bigelow wasted money on Dnepr, Musk didn't.

I'd say Musk is now ahead.

He'll give Bigelow a helping hand now though so he doesn't have to buy that Atlas V he's been talking about.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0