-
#260
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 17:39
-
they are going up and down the ET now (orbiter side)
-
#261
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 17:43
-
-
#262
by
padrat
on 15 Jun, 2011 17:49
-
I know that our engineers, at least, will do a system scan with the cameras, usually after we are in stable replenish.
-
#263
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 17:58
-
I know that our engineers, at least, will do a system scan with the cameras, usually after we are in stable replenish.
Well, please ask them to use a camera that I can at least see full screen of
hehe
-
#264
by
psloss
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:04
-
I know that our engineers, at least, will do a system scan with the cameras, usually after we are in stable replenish.
Well, please ask them to use a camera that I can at least see full screen of hehe
Or ask the guys that called up those 9 particular cameras on the board you're looking at...but then those aren't NASA or USA, they're media.
-
#265
by
Mapperuo
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:13
-
I know that our engineers, at least, will do a system scan with the cameras, usually after we are in stable replenish.
Well, please ask them to use a camera that I can at least see full screen of hehe
NASA have a live stream of channel 8 here:
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/countdown/video/ But it's not the best view.
-
#266
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:15
-
Someone heard me
-
#267
by
LostInSpace
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:33
-
and here come the storms....
-
#268
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:35
-
-
#269
by
MarekCyzio
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:36
-
and here come the storms....
Looks like this time the storms will pass east of the KSC:
http://goo.gl/XPwpv
-
#270
by
Chris Bergin
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:38
-
Into topping and the GUCP is good.
However, there's been an exceeded SSME LCC limit which will require a R&R effort and assessments on the launch date are being evaluated based on work.
Will write up the L2 notes.
-
#271
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 18:39
-
-
#272
by
rdale
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:01
-
Looks like the storms are staying along the sea breeze and should avoid the pad with this current batch.
-
#273
by
Chris Bergin
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:02
-
Could get sporty with the weather, but they'll be detanking soon.
Again, no word of any problems with the tank, so ET-138's behaved itself. SSME-3 however.
Going to step off the thread for a bit and write up the notes, add it to the article.
One official note is PWR (who are the SSME guys) say they "might" still make July 8. We'll keep a close eye on it.
"THIS is why we test".
-
#274
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:07
-
-
#275
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:07
-
-
#276
by
ChrisGebhardt
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:12
-
Into topping and the GUCP is good.
However, there's been an exceeded SSME LCC limit which will require a R&R effort and assessments on the launch date are being evaluated based on work.
Will write up the L2 notes.
Remember here that Mike Moses specifically mentioned in the 134 post-landing presser that they had "2 days contingency"
on paper but that was only minimal work planned for the week following the Tanking Test and that there's more wiggle room in reality than on paper. This
might not be a schedule hit at all if that's true.
-
#277
by
psloss
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:33
-
Remember here that Mike Moses specifically mentioned in the 134 post-landing presser that they had "2 days contingency" on paper but that was only minimal work planned for the week following the Tanking Test and that there's more wiggle room in reality than on paper. This might not be a schedule hit at all if that's true.
As long as that can run in parallel with other activities (like payload install, TCDT, etc.)...
But I'm sure we'll get an official assessment before too long. (And if not today, it'll come up tomorrow.)
-
#278
by
Chris Bergin
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:36
-
-
#279
by
robertross
on 15 Jun, 2011 19:42
-
hehe