NASA Langley confirms they are working to confirm the Widom/Larsen LENR theory

• #100 by Star One on 27 Oct, 2016 18:36
• I meant to post this a while back.
  
  https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130910-300-cold-fusion-sciences-most-controversial-technology-is-back/
  
  If you can login the whole article is worth a read whatever your position on LENR.
• #101 by Willem Staal on 01 Dec, 2016 10:26
• Quote from: bad_astra on 20 May, 2013 19:02

  3rd Party review of the "Rossi Device." is now available. I was and remain extremely skeptical, but the paper is interesting reading
  http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
  

  i stil think this is not a cold fusion device, its merely a new form of energy transistor.
  
• #102 by Bob012345 on 01 Dec, 2016 17:27
• Quote from: Willem Staal on 01 Dec, 2016 10:26

  Quote from: bad_astra on 20 May, 2013 19:02

  3rd Party review of the "Rossi Device." is now available. I was and remain extremely skeptical, but the paper is interesting reading
  http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
  

  i stil think this is not a cold fusion device, its merely a new form of energy transistor.
  

  
  I wish NASA was interested in Mills' SunCell concept and in the hydrino science behind it. Actually, they were over a decade ago but were embarrassed when people found out. The process has advanced so much recently.
  The power is in the megawatt range, at least briefly.
  
  http://brilliantlightpower.com/plasma-video/
  
  
  Also, Mills believes the Rossi results are not 'cold fusion' but rather possibly hydrino reactions.
  
  Further, Scientific American has published an article first appearing in Chemical and Engineering news which is positive on LENR and Open to Mills' hydrino (at least far more open than before).
  
  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cold-fusion-lives-experiments-create-energy-when-none-should-exist1/
  
  
  
• #103 by bad_astra on 18 Oct, 2017 17:51
• http://northerncalifornia.alumclub.mit.edu/s/1314/2015/club-class-main.aspx?sid=1314&gid=25&pgid=40742&cid=62473&ecid=62473&crid=0&calpgid=19964&calcid=33394
  
  Peter Hagelstein will be giving some sort of public address in Palo Alto November 14. Might be interesting.
• #104 by Star One on 18 Oct, 2017 17:58
• Quote from: bad_astra on 18 Oct, 2017 17:51

  http://northerncalifornia.alumclub.mit.edu/s/1314/2015/club-class-main.aspx?sid=1314&gid=25&pgid=40742&cid=62473&ecid=62473&crid=0&calpgid=19964&calcid=33394
  
  Peter Hagelstein will be giving some sort of public address in Palo Alto November 14. Might be interesting.
  

  
  Well reading the outline from your link it’s relatively clear that it’s a history of the topic combined with some kind of ideas for the future. It doesn’t sound like he’s going to make any ground shaking announcements.
• #105 by ppnl on 18 Oct, 2017 19:25
• Quote from: Willem Staal on 10 Oct, 2016 12:29

  Quote from: Elmar Moelzer on 07 Oct, 2015 19:25

  Quote from: sghill on 07 Oct, 2015 19:05

  Or if you simply want hard information on why the e-cat reactor doesn't work as advertised go here:
  http://www.scribd.com/doc/258595858/USPTO-Final-Rejection-Rossi-Patent
  
  Honestly, I am still scratching my head over what changed between March when USPTO issued a "final rejection" letter to Rossi and August when they accepted the application and granted the patent, but I go do some primary research before shooting my mouth off.
  

  Different patent. The new patent does not mention LENR in any way.
  I want to add that while there are a lot of "notes" from respectable scientists floating around, I have yet to see a peer reviewed paper in a physics publication that actually confirms the whole thing. So far, all I see are reviews by "believers" and nothing from skeptics. You need to convince the latter and not the former in order to convince me.
  

  Rossi's claim is not whats really happening i guess. I think they just made a form of energy transistor, not a fusion reactor.
  

  
  Almost afraid to ask but what is an energy transistor?