Author Topic: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)  (Read 285358 times)

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 678
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #380 on: 06/18/2012 09:36 pm »
Perhaps this is a better thread for it - A new tweet from Elon Musk that just went out: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/214831794103664640

Quote
Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk
Just fired our Superdraco escape rocket engine at full thrust! Needed to carry astronauts on Dragon pic.twitter.com/ef86qbWF

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 678
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #381 on: 06/18/2012 09:39 pm »
This appears to be a new vertical SD test stand at McGregor, TX. It looks different than the Merlin stands, and I assume the hole is too small for Merlin firings as well.

Can anyone guess a size of the engine based on this image?

Offline Halidon

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 848
  • whereabouts unknown
  • Liked: 180
  • Likes Given: 535
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #382 on: 06/18/2012 09:56 pm »
In my head, I just heard Crocodile Dundee say "now that's a thruster."

I wonder if they will test paired thrusters on the stand before progressing to "hopper"-style tethered testing.

Offline Alpha Control

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 112
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #383 on: 06/18/2012 09:59 pm »
This appears to be a new vertical SD test stand at McGregor, TX. It looks different than the Merlin stands, and I assume the hole is too small for Merlin firings as well.

Can anyone guess a size of the engine based on this image?

Lars,
I see a blue staircase in the background that gives a sense of the scale of the platform. To my eyes then, the engine doesn't seem large - 1-2 ft high? (just my very rough guess).
Space launches attended:
Antares/Cygnus ORB-D1 Wallops Island, VA Sept 2013 | STS-123 KSC, FL March 2008 | SpaceShipOne Mojave, CA June 2004

Offline modemeagle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
  • Grand Blanc, MI
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #384 on: 06/18/2012 10:10 pm »
I calculated, using some educated guesses on some parameters, that the chamber is ~ 14" dia and ~18" long, which is very close to the size of the chamber for the 1D (also calculated with a few guesses).  The nozzle should be ~16 inches for Pe=Pa.

Offline HMXHMX

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
  • Liked: 2269
  • Likes Given: 685
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #385 on: 06/18/2012 10:22 pm »
I calculated, using some educated guesses on some parameters, that the chamber is ~ 14" dia and ~18" long, which is very close to the size of the chamber for the 1D (also calculated with a few guesses).  The nozzle should be ~16 inches for Pe=Pa.

Based on the mockup exhibited at Space Tech Expo, I'd estimate the exit is 8 inches in diameter.

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 678
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #386 on: 06/18/2012 10:22 pm »
This may help... Using the camera position and perspective, I have highlighted two vertical red bars that would be the same actual height.

Now all we need to know is the height of the guide rail to know the dimensions of the SD thrust chamber.

Does anyone know what the standard height is of a guide/safety rail like that? ;)

Offline MikeAtkinson

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1980
  • Bracknell, England
  • Liked: 784
  • Likes Given: 127
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #387 on: 06/18/2012 10:29 pm »
The nozzle should be ~16 inches for Pe=Pa.

It looks underexpanded to me.

Offline MikeAtkinson

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1980
  • Bracknell, England
  • Liked: 784
  • Likes Given: 127
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #388 on: 06/18/2012 10:31 pm »
This may help... Using the camera position and perspective, I have highlighted two vertical red bars that would be the same actual height.

Now all we need to know is the height of the guide rail to know the dimensions of the SD thrust chamber.

Does anyone know what the standard height is of a guide/safety rail like that? ;)


That helps, but I think the camera is slightly above the top of the thrust chamber, so that the red scale line on the rail should be a bit smaller.

[edit: the horizon is 2/3 up the picture, so the camera is pointing down slightly.]
« Last Edit: 06/18/2012 10:34 pm by MikeAtkinson »

Offline HMXHMX

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
  • Liked: 2269
  • Likes Given: 685
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #389 on: 06/18/2012 10:32 pm »
The nozzle should be ~16 inches for Pe=Pa.

It looks underexpanded to me.

This engine is also used for landing.  In that mode, it has to be able to deeply throttle.  I estimate it throttles about 8:1, maybe 10:1, from the max abort thrust level.  They will have designed for no separation at the most deeply throttled sea level condition.
« Last Edit: 06/18/2012 10:33 pm by HMXHMX »

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 678
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #390 on: 06/18/2012 10:34 pm »
That helps, but I think the camera is slightly above the top of the thrust chamber, so that the red scale line on the rail should be a bit smaller.

Nope - pay attention to the horizon. Both of the red bars end at the same level - the horizon. If the camera was above the thrust chamber, the horizon would be above it.

Quote
[edit: the horizon is 2/3 up the picture, so the camera is pointing down slightly.]

It doesn't matter - if a picture includes a horizon line - that line is exactly horizontal. (and the virtual triangle formed from the camera to the edge horizon points is 100% even/flat) It doesn't matter if the camera was pointing mostly up or down.
« Last Edit: 06/18/2012 11:03 pm by Lars_J »

Offline modemeagle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
  • Grand Blanc, MI
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #391 on: 06/18/2012 10:37 pm »
My numbers were based on a 132psi chamber pressure (just a guess).
I have been thinking for a while that their system is much higher which would make the chamber smaller then my estimated size.

Offline DigitalMan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1745
  • Liked: 1230
  • Likes Given: 76

Offline modemeagle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
  • Grand Blanc, MI
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #393 on: 06/19/2012 04:43 am »
This may help... Using the camera position and perspective, I have highlighted two vertical red bars that would be the same actual height.

Now all we need to know is the height of the guide rail to know the dimensions of the SD thrust chamber.

Does anyone know what the standard height is of a guide/safety rail like that? ;)

quick search came up with 42" for railing

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #394 on: 06/19/2012 04:55 am »
Would need to throttle more than 10:1 for Red Dragon I think.  Or maybe they'll only fire 4 superdracos instead of all 8 for that.
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6362
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4235
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #395 on: 06/19/2012 05:03 am »
IIRC at the Mars Concepts and Approaches conference they were talking an SD throttling range of 5% to 100%.
« Last Edit: 06/19/2012 05:05 am by docmordrid »
DM

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39545
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25697
  • Likes Given: 12280
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #396 on: 06/19/2012 05:11 am »
Of course with the very low Martian pressure, separation isn't an issue.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #397 on: 06/19/2012 01:58 pm »
Considering the level of under expansion, you would have to be landing Dragons on Venus before you have a separation issue.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline baldusi

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8389
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Liked: 2593
  • Likes Given: 8476
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #398 on: 06/19/2012 05:39 pm »
On Red Dragon it was going to make 7g. At 5 tonnes, 0.375g of Mars gravity, that's 368kN? That's 82.7klbf. That's 69% of throttle.
Hover on Earth's sea level would require just 49kN, or 11klbf, that's 9.1% with eight SD, 18.2% for four. More reasonable.
« Last Edit: 06/19/2012 05:42 pm by baldusi »

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: SpaceX: Advanced Launch Abort System (LAS)
« Reply #399 on: 06/19/2012 08:21 pm »
On Red Dragon it was going to make 7g. At 5 tonnes, 0.375g of Mars gravity, that's 368kN? That's 82.7klbf. That's 69% of throttle.
Hover on Earth's sea level would require just 49kN, or 11klbf, that's 9.1% with eight SD, 18.2% for four. More reasonable.
Red dragon planned to have a very slow final descent after the 7 g phase.  Hover on Mars = .38 g or lower. 

6.9% using only 4... 

That's throttling from 100% to less than 3.5% if using all 8.
« Last Edit: 06/19/2012 08:31 pm by go4mars »
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1