Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD  (Read 611311 times)

Offline Zaran

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 104
  • England
  • Liked: 22
  • Likes Given: 62
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #340 on: 11/21/2013 06:22 pm »
To move my question here from the update thread (sorry!):

[In relation to the WDR+HF test]If it was a tank rupture, would you expect it to vent that heavily for as long as it has been?

Looked to me, not that I have any in depth knowledge of the systems in place here, that the plume was originating near were I believe the umbilical are connected to the first stage, might be a bad connection there perhaps?

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5354
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #341 on: 11/21/2013 06:23 pm »
It didn't look good on the video before they cut it off.
People have speculated about a rupture, but Jim assures us that it doesn't look like liquid coming out of the first stage.  Could be GSE.  Could be venting the whole LOX load. 
Second stage venting looks normal, Jim says.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Elvis in Space

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 570
  • Elvis is Everywhere
  • Still on Earth
  • Liked: 785
  • Likes Given: 6500
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #342 on: 11/21/2013 06:24 pm »
To move my question here from the update thread (sorry!):

[In relation to the WDR+HF test]If it was a tank rupture, would you expect it to vent that heavily for as long as it has been?

Looked to me, not that I have any in depth knowledge of the systems in place here, that the plume was originating near were I believe the umbilical are connected to the first stage, might be a bad connection there perhaps?

Yeah who knows? Light rain, ice buildup somewhere on a valve or umbilical connection? I would think if it was on the T/E then they would have been able to shut off the flow.
Cheeseburgers on Mars!

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2361
  • USA
  • Liked: 1977
  • Likes Given: 988
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #343 on: 11/21/2013 06:25 pm »
Ok, to me it seemed there was a rupture in the umbilical connection and they couldn't turn off the pumps. Is that even feasible?
Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #344 on: 11/21/2013 06:25 pm »
To move my question here from the update thread (sorry!):

[In relation to the WDR+HF test]If it was a tank rupture, would you expect it to vent that heavily for as long as it has been?

Looked to me, not that I have any in depth knowledge of the systems in place here, that the plume was originating near were I believe the umbilical are connected to the first stage, might be a bad connection there perhaps?

A tank rupture is probably unlikely. The S1 LOX tank remained iced over, and it was venting for a while. It is hard to tell, but the venting could have come from the S2 lines in the T/E.

BTW, the S1 is filled from the bottom. There is no connector where the vent smoke ended.

Offline Oberon_Command

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
  • Liked: 62
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #345 on: 11/21/2013 06:26 pm »
Is it possible that the tanking went well, then the hotfire occurred as planned, but something in the GSE failed preventing them from draining the LOX back, necessitating just venting all the LOX in the tank? If that were the case, would the stage take any damage from venting all the lox?

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #346 on: 11/21/2013 06:27 pm »
People have speculated about a rupture, but Jim assures us that it doesn't look like liquid coming out of the first stage. 

I'm not so sure about that. If the leak was small and high up, LOX could have trickled down the stage while evaporating vigorously. At the end, before they cut off the feed, the venting was coming off even from below the LOX tank suggesting that it was spilling along the tank spin, to the RP-1 tank.

Wathing it on a recording, the weird thing is the venting didn't seem to start abruptly at all.

Offline Bugfix

  • Member
  • Posts: 74
  • 45 km WSW of Buran OK-GLI
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 482
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #347 on: 11/21/2013 06:29 pm »
Is it possible that the tanking went well, then the hotfire occurred as planned, but something in the GSE failed preventing them from draining the LOX back, necessitating just venting all the LOX in the tank? If that were the case, would the stage take any damage from venting all the lox?
Well, it was already heavyly venting before the scheduled time of the hotfire, so this seems unlikely.

Offline Zaran

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 104
  • England
  • Liked: 22
  • Likes Given: 62
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #348 on: 11/21/2013 06:30 pm »
BTW, the S1 is filled from the bottom. There is no connector where the vent smoke ended.

Ah, I didn't know this! Thanks for that info, guess that means the TE is the primary suspect here.

Offline WHAP

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Liked: 105
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #349 on: 11/21/2013 06:30 pm »
Moved from update thread:

Anyone know whether S-X fills their tank from the bottom or the top?  I'd think the bottom, but I don't know.  If it's the bottom, I wouldn't expect a GSE problem with the first stage fill mechanism to result in a plume that looks like what we saw - more something coming from the top or side.

Another option could be a problem with the fill line for S2, but it just didn't seem like that to me.
ULA employee.  My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2361
  • USA
  • Liked: 1977
  • Likes Given: 988
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #350 on: 11/21/2013 06:32 pm »
It felt like an overflow issue. Like they couldn't turn the pumps off and the bucket just started overflowing.
Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #351 on: 11/21/2013 06:33 pm »
Moved from update thread:

Anyone know whether S-X fills their tank from the bottom or the top?  I'd think the bottom, but I don't know.  If it's the bottom, I wouldn't expect a GSE problem with the first stage fill mechanism to result in a plume that looks like what we saw - more something coming from the top or side.

Another option could be a problem with the fill line for S2, but it just didn't seem like that to me.

The connections can be seen in this image. Stage one is filled from the bottom/base.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7253
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2079
  • Likes Given: 2005
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #352 on: 11/21/2013 06:34 pm »
Can anyone find any previously released imagery showing the S1 LOX vent hardware? Assuming a large enough rupture unplanned opening near there, could boiling LOX in the tank "splash" out and dribble down the outside of the tank before evaporating off? Would that explain what we observed?
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline WHAP

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Liked: 105
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #353 on: 11/21/2013 06:35 pm »
Ok, to me it seemed there was a rupture in the umbilical connection and they couldn't turn off the pumps. Is that even feasible?

Yes, if you've only got one set of valves between the pumps (if any - many vehicles do not use pumps) and the tank.  Usually should have at least two in between.
ULA employee.  My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #354 on: 11/21/2013 06:37 pm »
It didn't look good on the video before they cut it off.
I'm clearing my throat, but there doesn't seem to be a thread for that. 
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=33182.0

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 11/21/2013 06:39 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #355 on: 11/21/2013 06:40 pm »

BTW, the S1 is filled from the bottom.

SOP for first stages

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2361
  • USA
  • Liked: 1977
  • Likes Given: 988
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #356 on: 11/21/2013 06:40 pm »
It didn't look good on the video before they cut it off.
I'm clearing my throat, but there doesn't seem to be a thread for that. 
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=33182.0

 - Ed Kyle
Point taken.
Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #357 on: 11/21/2013 06:41 pm »
Can anyone find any previously released imagery showing the S1 LOX vent hardware? Assuming a large enough rupture unplanned opening near there, could boiling LOX in the tank "splash" out and dribble down the outside of the tank before evaporating off?

It might, IMHO.

Offline mheney

  • The Next Man on the Moon
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 780
  • Silver Spring, MD
  • Liked: 398
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #358 on: 11/21/2013 06:41 pm »
Along with the significant venting along the 1st stage LOX tank, there was a lesser (but still notable) amount of venting from the 2nd stage LOX tank - there was a "crown" of vapor over the stack.  May be wishful thinking - but that sounds more like a GSE issue than a vehicle issue - two leaky stages seems less likely...

Offline Chris Bergin

Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - SES-8 - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #359 on: 11/21/2013 06:43 pm »
GSE would make more sense as they have been working on that until the last minute.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1