To move my question here from the update thread (sorry!):[In relation to the WDR+HF test]If it was a tank rupture, would you expect it to vent that heavily for as long as it has been? Looked to me, not that I have any in depth knowledge of the systems in place here, that the plume was originating near were I believe the umbilical are connected to the first stage, might be a bad connection there perhaps?
People have speculated about a rupture, but Jim assures us that it doesn't look like liquid coming out of the first stage.
Is it possible that the tanking went well, then the hotfire occurred as planned, but something in the GSE failed preventing them from draining the LOX back, necessitating just venting all the LOX in the tank? If that were the case, would the stage take any damage from venting all the lox?
BTW, the S1 is filled from the bottom. There is no connector where the vent smoke ended.
Moved from update thread:Anyone know whether S-X fills their tank from the bottom or the top? I'd think the bottom, but I don't know. If it's the bottom, I wouldn't expect a GSE problem with the first stage fill mechanism to result in a plume that looks like what we saw - more something coming from the top or side.Another option could be a problem with the fill line for S2, but it just didn't seem like that to me.
Ok, to me it seemed there was a rupture in the umbilical connection and they couldn't turn off the pumps. Is that even feasible?
It didn't look good on the video before they cut it off.
BTW, the S1 is filled from the bottom.
Quote from: Comga on 11/21/2013 06:23 pmIt didn't look good on the video before they cut it off.I'm clearing my throat, but there doesn't seem to be a thread for that. http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=33182.0 - Ed Kyle
Can anyone find any previously released imagery showing the S1 LOX vent hardware? Assuming a large enough rupture unplanned opening near there, could boiling LOX in the tank "splash" out and dribble down the outside of the tank before evaporating off?