Author Topic: STS-134: Pad Flow Latest (Rollout to S0007) (Read 294729 times)

stockman · « **Reply #241 on:** 03/21/2011 11:48 pm »

Quote from: Ronsmytheiii on 03/21/2011 11:46 pm

and out of webcam view, have to say live coverage has been a bit disappointing

a few different camera angles would have been good...agreed.. its not like they don't have the web cams available... I sometimes wonder myself why they don't plan these things out a little bit better... oh well... we get what we get...

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #242 on:** 03/22/2011 12:03 am »

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=lf#!/AMS02

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #243 on:** 03/22/2011 12:13 am »

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=lf#!/AMS02

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #244 on:** 03/22/2011 03:05 am »

TheFallen · « **Reply #245 on:** 03/22/2011 03:55 am »

Chris Bergin · « **Reply #246 on:** 03/22/2011 06:02 am »

Article on the flow and fine-tuning plans for the range issue from STS-133:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/03/sts-134-39a-managers-to-avoid-countdown-drama/

stockman · « **Reply #247 on:** 03/22/2011 12:23 pm »

current shot this morning...

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #248 on:** 03/22/2011 09:21 pm »

apace · « **Reply #249 on:** 03/22/2011 09:24 pm »

And how they get now the payload into the shuttle? Are the doors of this container not on the wrong side now? Are there any information available about vertical processing at pad?

rdale · « **Reply #250 on:** 03/22/2011 09:25 pm »

Yes, use the search function here and peruse the Q&A thread.

stockman · « **Reply #251 on:** 03/22/2011 10:38 pm »

Space Pete · « **Reply #252 on:** 03/22/2011 11:01 pm »

AMS & ELC-3 in the PCR, and in the last photo, installed in the PGHM!

It's been a long wait, there were times I thought I'd never see AMS in the PCR.

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #253 on:** 03/23/2011 03:13 am »

canister has been moved away from the PCR, ready to be lowered

http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/countdown/video/

Edit: lowering

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #254 on:** 03/23/2011 03:32 am »

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #255 on:** 03/23/2011 03:42 am »

Ronsmytheiii · « **Reply #256 on:** 03/23/2011 03:58 am »

anik · « **Reply #257 on:** 03/23/2011 08:43 am »

There is rumour that Roskosmos has asked NASA to delay STS-134 launch by 10 days, because Progress M-10M launch can not be delayed and its docking should be on April 29.

janmb · « **Reply #258 on:** 03/23/2011 09:04 am »

Quote from: anik on 03/23/2011 08:43 am

There is rumour that Roskosmos has asked NASA to delay STS-134 launch by 10 days, because Progress M-10M launch can not be delayed and its docking should be on April 29.

Hmm, help me understand this....

Are you talking about a progress launch that has slipped from its originally intended launch date?

Or are you mixing up with the somewhat delayed Soyuz launch currently targeting the 4th?

If that progress docking had been slated for the 29th, that would been a constraint to 134 launch on the 19th all along and as such that date would never been targeted in the first place.

Not questioning your information, just trying to wrestle out the full story here.

TFGQ · « **Reply #259 on:** 03/23/2011 10:06 am »

RSS now covering Endeavour