If anyone else having issues with the video loaded from flash\browser here is a direct link so can just save as...
http://www.ulalaunch.com/site/Video/videos/CCDev_YIR2010.wmv
Cool stuff. Starting to get stoked to see what Orion really looks like sitting on a D4. And all the others too.
This video of a simulation of an astronaut in an Atlas V is also worth watching:
http://www.ulalaunch.com/site/Video/videos/NASTAR_Feb2011.wmv
Well I hope an astronaut would never be "in" an Atlas V, simulation or not. 
OK, I have edited my original post accordingly. From the video, it looks to be the CST-100. But I imagine that the experience would be similar for other spacecrafts.
This screenshot and the SFN article confirm that ULA is baselining the Atlas 402 version, wonder how long/how much money that will take to get the Dual engine Centaur
Since Feb 21, 2003. First launch of the existing Centaur tank in a dual-engine configuration was done on an Atlas III for Echostar VII. This did utilize the older Centaur control systems, however. But, the basic configuration has been flown already. There will need to be some work to adapt the new systems to the configuration, but as ULA insists that they developed them with the configuration in mind, I have no reason to doubt them.
(Discovered this last week)
This screenshot and the SFN article confirm that ULA is baselining the Atlas 402 version, wonder how long/how much money that will take to get the Dual engine Centaur
Since Feb 21, 2003. First launch of the existing Centaur tank in a dual-engine configuration was done on an Atlas III for Echostar VII. This did utilize the older Centaur control systems, however. But, the basic configuration has been flown already. There will need to be some work to adapt the new systems to the configuration, but as ULA insists that they developed them with the configuration in mind, I have no reason to doubt them.
(Discovered this last week)
Any idea how much the double-engine configuration will cost per unit, or compared to the single-engine version?
If the vehicle does not have a payload fairing, how can it be called an Atlas 402 vs. an Atlas 502? Is it because the Centaur is exposed to the aero environment and has the load path of the 402 vs. the fully encapsulated and hung Centaur in the 502?
Perhaps it will be called the Atlas 002?
