Author Topic: 2010 SBIR Awards  (Read 4982 times)

Offline neilh

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2365
  • Pasadena, CA
  • Liked: 46
  • Likes Given: 149
2010 SBIR Awards
« on: 12/12/2010 06:44 am »
Although these were alluded to in the Altius and Masten threads, NASA's NASA 2010 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program awards (over 300 of them) were selected and announced December 8. Award lists and abstracts are up here:

http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/sbir2010/phase1/awards/index.html
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/SBIR.html

There's a lot of interesting stuff, but a few highlights:

Masten Space Systems, Inc.
Terrestrial Plume Impingement Testbed

Altius Space Machines, Inc.
An ElectroAdhesive "Stick Boom" for Mars Sample Return Orbiting Sample Capture

Pioneer Astronautics
Mars Regolith Water Extractor

Tethers Unlimited
Scalable, Lightweight, Low-Cost Aero/Electrodynamic Drag Deorbit Module

Honeybee Robotics Ltd.
5 in 1 Drill For Mars Sample Return Mission
Someone is wrong on the Internet.
http://xkcd.com/386/

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #1 on: 12/12/2010 07:10 am »
Those are really neat!
This one caught my eye, since Carbon Monoxide (and Oxygen) Martian ISRU for propulsion fuel is one of my hobby horses. (It seems so easy compared to other ISRU methods.)

http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X1.02-8882.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1
Quote
Gas, Liquid, and Solid Processing to Produce Oxygen and Fuels from In-Situ Resources
Development of a Robust, Highly Efficient Oxygen-Carbon Monoxide Cogeneration System


This small business innovation research is intended to develop a long-life, highly efficient O2-CO cogeneration system to support NASA's endeavors to pursue extraterrestrial exploration (Moon, Mars, and Asteroids/Phobos). The cogeneration system will be built using a Tubular, Negative Electrode-supported Solid-Oxide Electrolysis Cell (Tune-SOEC) employing MSRI's most promising degradation-resistant ceramic materials and a unique cell design. The system will be capable of co-generating breathable oxygen and CO fuel directly from carbon dioxide extracted from the Martian atmosphere, lunar regolith/soil, or from the cabin air of extraterrestrial human missions at 750~850ºC. In Phase I, CO2 electrolysis degradation mechanisms will be investigated via nonequilibrium thermodynamic analyses and tests of Tune-SOECs with special embedded reference electrodes. Unique solutions for long-term, high performance CO2 electrolysis will be developed and implemented. In Phase II, a prototype O2-CO cogeneration system using the Tune-SOEC technology will be developed. A proof-of-concept system will be demonstrated, cogenerating O2-CO directly from a CO2 source at temperatures ranging from 750ºC to 850ºC; showing the capability of using ISRU to generate 1 kg oxygen per day (enough to support 1 human).

Also, this one: "High Thrust Efficiency MPD Thruster" would be quite important, since MPD thrusters would be amazing (because of their very low mass for the high power, or very high specific power, much better than VASIMR) if you could make one that wasn't so atrociously inefficient. http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X2.04-9542.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

Also this one: Lightweight Inflatable Cryogenic Tank http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X5.03-8613.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

And boron nanotubes to reinforce aluminum alloys:
Nanotube MMC for structural applications
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X5.02-8426.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

Novel Ultra-Miniature Flexible Videoscope for On-Orbit NDE (could be helpful for re-qualifying, say, a reusable lunar lander, and at 1mm diameter endoscope, you could basically snake this thing through the injector of a rocket, that way you wouldn't have to unscrew anything)
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X5.04-9915.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

Also, some work on a Methane fuel cell, giving some advantages of a hydrolox architecture (like using propellant for electricity production) to a methane/LOx architecture.

Another one regarding a modular and scalable (but high specific power, like 200-500W/kg at the wing level) solar array system going from 100kW to many Megawatts:
Modular Ultra-High Power Solar Array Architecture
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X8.04-9339.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1
(Solar-electric propulsion, especially with high power and high specific power solar arrays, is another hobby horse of mine)

Another one for high specific-power solar arrays:
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X8.04-9431.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

And yet another high specific-power solar array technology: (this one says 500W/kg at the array level, 1000W/kg at the blanket level)
Affordable Practical High-Efficiency Photovoltaic Concentrator Blanket Assembly for Ultra-Lightweight Solar Arrays
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-S3.03-8462.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

And yet another 500W/kg specific power (at the array level) solar array technology:
SOLAROSA (Stretched Optical Lens Architecture on Roll-Out Solar Array)
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-S3.03-9394.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

Another 300-350W/kg specific power (at array level, I think) solar array:
FDM-HaWK, A High Performance Compact Modular Solar Array
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-S3.03-9462.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1

It looks like we will have substantially advanced the TRL level of high specific power solar arrays (300-500W/kg) very soon, enabling it to soon be baselined in many different electric propulsion projects. This is far better performance (about 2x or 4x current state-of-the-art) than existing solar arrays, thus allowing mission designers to choose either yet higher Isp (allowing higher mission delta-v or lower IMLEO) or higher thrust, which can help make electric propulsion more worthwhile for shorter missions.

There's also some interesting work on different Mars reentry systems, including deployable ones. Also, lots of interesting stuff about on-orbit cryogenic propellant management, including good insulation and even a hydrogen liquefier.
« Last Edit: 12/12/2010 08:25 am by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #2 on: 12/12/2010 08:34 am »
Also thought this was cool:
http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/10/sbir/phase1/SBIR-10-1-X1.01-8174.html?solicitationId=SBIR_10_P1
Mars Regolith Water Extractor
Quote
The Mars Regolith Water Extractor (MRWE) is a system for acquiring water from the Martian soil. In the MRWE, a stream of CO2 is heated by solar energy or waste heat from a nuclear reactor and then passed through a vessel containing Martian soil freshly removed from the ground. The hot CO2 will cause water absorbed in the Martian soil to outgas, whereupon it will be swept along by the CO2 to a condenser chamber where ambient Martian cold temperatures will be used to condense the water from the CO2. The CO2 is then pumped back to the heater where it is reheated and recirculated back to the soil vessel to remove more water. Measurements taken by the Viking mission showed that randomly gathered Martian soil contains at least 1% water by weight, and probably more than 3%. This being the case, the MWRE should prove to be a highly effective way of acquiring water on Mars. By doing so, it will eliminate the requirement to transport hydrogen to Mars in order to make methane fuel, and allow all the propellant needed for a Mars to Earth return flight to be manufactured on Mars using a Sabatier/electrolysis (S/E) cycle, without any need for auxiliary oxygen production through zirconia cells, reverse water gas shift cycles, or other systems. This is highly advantageous since the S/E cycle is the simplest and easiest to implement of all Mars in-situ propellant production methods. The ability to extract water from Mars will also serve to supply the crew of a Mars missions with copious supplies of water itself, which after propellant, is the most massive logistic component of a Mars mission. By eliminating the need to transport fuel, oxygen, and water to Mars, the MWRE will have a major effect in reducing the mass, cost, and risk or human Mars exploration.
(This is Zubrin's project, actually.)
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6828
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 4046
  • Likes Given: 1741
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #3 on: 12/13/2010 01:31 am »
Altius Space Machines, Inc.
An ElectroAdhesive "Stick Boom" for Mars Sample Return Orbiting Sample Capture

I have to admit it's pretty darned embarrassing to notice that I had a typo in the title for my proposal.  It's supposed to be "Sticky Boom" not "Stick Boom".

~Jon

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #4 on: 12/13/2010 06:44 pm »
One thing I really like is the sheer number of awards that are for pushing the TRL of large, high-specific-power (300-500W/kg) solar arrays to around 4 or 5, which would then be enough for a technology demonstration mission (bringing it TRL 6 or 7). This will enable mission planners to add these high specific power solar arrays to the critical path for a real mission, like a (reusable) Mars Transfer Vehicle (if ever funded). In fact, 500W/kg (at the array level) is twice what was assumed for the STCAEM SEP study.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #5 on: 12/24/2010 05:50 pm »
I should mention that the 2009 SBIR Phase 2 awards were released in October, 2010, and also included many very interesting concepts: http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/sbir2008/phase2/awards/index.htm

...including at least one proposal that advances an Ultraflex-derived solar array with over 380W/kg BOL specific power from TRL 3 to TRL 6 estimated by the end of the contract:  http://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/09/sbir/phase2/SBIR-09-2-S3.03-9404.html?solicitationId=SBIR_09_P2


(If you haven't noticed, SEP is a hobby horse of mine, including especially high specific power solar arrays.)
« Last Edit: 12/24/2010 05:51 pm by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #6 on: 12/27/2010 06:32 am »
Yeah, the ultraflex-style circular panels seem to be getting quite popular these days; the planetary decadal survey white papers seems to have quite a few missions baselined with them. Which is a lot, given that they've only flown once before...

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #7 on: 12/27/2010 02:42 pm »
Yeah, the ultraflex-style circular panels seem to be getting quite popular these days; the planetary decadal survey white papers seems to have quite a few missions baselined with them. Which is a lot, given that they've only flown once before...
It's because of their large performance (can be 15kW per wing), high specific power (150W/kg, but can be twice as high, see above posts about SBIR 2009 Phase 2 awards), high stiffness compared to conventional arrays, are backed by a big company (ATK), and that they are going to be used on Orion.

Also, ASRGs are baselined, in spite of the fact that they have never flown in any form.

When the performance/risk ratio becomes large enough, it makes a LOT of sense to go for it. For the same mass budget, you can triple your power compared to older traditional arrays. That's a pretty good trade.
« Last Edit: 12/27/2010 02:57 pm by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: 2010 SBIR Awards
« Reply #8 on: 04/06/2013 04:04 am »
Sorry for thread necromancy, but ParabolicArc just posted a series of very nice updates on the new SBIR awards, found here
http://www.parabolicarc.com/tag/sbir/

split to "2013 SBIR" thread if you wish.
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1