Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates  (Read 448899 times)

Offline cuddihy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1251
  • Liked: 580
  • Likes Given: 940
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #860 on: 08/20/2011 12:30 am »
I would agree with Simon.  Platforms are static and can't hit the hardware plus you don't need a certification to operate from one.  Where is the air exchange unit for the personnel entering the capsule via the ladder?  It is a confined space.

Air exchange looks like left behind of Dragon, blue hose going into Dragon there.

That is half assed.

Huh? How much money do you have to spend to change out some air?

This the way it's done all over the world. I went in about every void and tank on a submarine with nothing more advanced. It's not a clean room requirement, right?

Offline robertross

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17939
  • Westphal, Nova Scotia
  • Liked: 659
  • Likes Given: 7725
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #861 on: 08/20/2011 01:02 am »
I would agree with Simon.  Platforms are static and can't hit the hardware plus you don't need a certification to operate from one.  Where is the air exchange unit for the personnel entering the capsule via the ladder?  It is a confined space.

Air exchange looks like left behind of Dragon, blue hose going into Dragon there.

That is half assed.

Huh? How much money do you have to spend to change out some air?

This the way it's done all over the world. I went in about every void and tank on a submarine with nothing more advanced. It's not a clean room requirement, right?

Pinched or a collapsed hose is possible, as well as bag tearing (which is what that is, a long bag). Having what amounts to a vacuum hose with a spiral wound internal support structure ensures these conditions cannot happen. The ducting they use on the ISS through the hatches between the shuttle and structure is a prime example of a safer method.

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #862 on: 08/20/2011 01:54 am »
All of the hoses look spiral-wound or reinforced to me. Also, now that I look closely, there appears to be purpose built platform to the left of the Dragon and behind the two cherry pickers. It has a padded, semi-circle cutout about the same diameter as the trunk. I can't explain why they're not using it now, maybe the photographer waited till it or the capsule was moved away so as to get a clearer picture.

I wish we could get a look under that plastic. I think we'd finally see what the grapple fixture and door looks like.

I was hoping they would release videos of the seperation and solar array gimbal tests. Footage from similar tests were included in previous updates.

I hope it's all well documented, for posterity at least. In the meantime, I'll try to be patient.
« Last Edit: 08/20/2011 02:12 pm by corrodedNut »

Offline kraisee

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10561
  • Liked: 811
  • Likes Given: 40
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #863 on: 08/20/2011 03:55 am »
That is half assed.

I don't think that's exactly fair Jim.

A low-cost reinforced plastic tube through the hatch is exactly how Shuttle circulated air into the crew cabin and that worked successfully for over three decades.




It seems to me that whenever humans are involved, hatches are just going to be left open for extended periods of time.   Given that, a cheap and simple hose through the hatch makes a great deal of sense.

So if everyone from Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Shuttle, Orion and now Dragon is doing it "half assed", as you say, would you at least take the time to describe the better ways that are used elsewhere?

Ross.
"The meek shall inherit the Earth -- the rest of us will go to the stars"
-Robert A. Heinlein

Offline HIP2BSQRE

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 668
  • Liked: 46
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #864 on: 08/20/2011 04:34 am »

Here we can see the attachment points for the solar arrays on the [t]runk... nice photos...

There it is.  A real live spacecraft.  Michael Griffin's legacy!
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1266/1

 - Ed Kyle

Even a stopped watch shows the right time twice per day.  ;) The COTS program is certainly one of the brighter spots on his record.

But there was potential for so much more....

Offline arnezami

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 285
  • Liked: 267
  • Likes Given: 378
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #865 on: 08/20/2011 08:13 am »
Looks like an MVac nozzle can be seen in the background.

There's also an interstage visible on the right between the two structures.

(and a smiley  :D)
I see two smileys :)

happy people.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #866 on: 08/20/2011 12:39 pm »
Half assed was putting the air ventilator on a manlift  vs a platform and nothing to do the ducting
« Last Edit: 08/20/2011 12:40 pm by Jim »

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #867 on: 08/20/2011 01:15 pm »
Here's a platform in use. I think we can assume it and any others were moved out the way only temporarily.

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #868 on: 08/20/2011 02:20 pm »
Here's a platform in use. I think we can assume it and any others were moved out the way only temporarily.

Are you sure that platform would have been usable with the trunk underneath?

That image is of a Dragon sitting on it's roller cart.

Considering how little of a Dragon's life at the Hawthorne facility will see it sitting on a trunk, why would they build a scaffold for Dragon + Trunk operations until they have enough vehicles in process that it would be used on a regular basis?

BTW serious question, didn't know if OSHA or ISO required such things.
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8625
  • Liked: 3702
  • Likes Given: 334
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #869 on: 08/20/2011 02:33 pm »
BUT! It's nice to see that they first spend money to build the spacecraft and NOT using first the money to build the supporting structures.

Scaffolding is orders of magnitude cheaper than scissor lifts and BSEWPs (man-lifts).  That's why it's used at many/most construction sites.  It's better and cheaper unless you have to have the go anywhere flexibility of a lift.

I agree that it's a little lame to put the ventilator in a scissor lift, especially since they have some permanent support with railing right behind it (really nice looking too).  My guess is that they know this and that this is a temporary situation while they wait for better structures to arrive from design and/or fabrication.  You never know what details led someone to do something that looks obviously stupid from afar when it makes perfect sense if you know the real reasons.

Offline apace

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 812
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #870 on: 08/20/2011 02:38 pm »
BUT! It's nice to see that they first spend money to build the spacecraft and NOT using first the money to build the supporting structures.

Scaffolding is orders of magnitude cheaper than scissor lifts and BSEWPs (man-lifts).  That's why it's used at many/most construction sites.  It's better and cheaper unless you have to have the go anywhere flexibility of a lift.

I agree that it's a little lame to put the ventilator in a scissor lift, especially since they have some permanent support with railing right behind it (really nice looking too).  My guess is that they know this and that this is a temporary situation while they wait for better structures to arrive from design and/or fabrication.  You never know what details led someone to do something that looks obviously stupid from afar when it makes perfect sense if you know the real reasons.

True. My comment was more in the general view, it's nice to see that a new craft is finished and it's also nice to see the step to step progress from first craft to the next one... I hope they can keep their way to improve hardware step by step.

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8894
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60677
  • Likes Given: 1333
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #871 on: 08/20/2011 07:56 pm »
Half assed was putting the air ventilator on a manlift  vs a platform and nothing to do the ducting
What would you call the way the shuttle hose is hanging by a bungee cord that looks like it's half restricting it?
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline Tcommon

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 145
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #872 on: 08/20/2011 08:54 pm »
Half assed was putting the air ventilator on a manlift  vs a platform and nothing to do the ducting
What would you call the way the shuttle hose is hanging by a bungee cord that looks like it's half restricting it?

As a design engineer, you learn never to criticize another's design without also putting your own idea on the table for criticism. I get the sense that Jim isn't a design engineer.
« Last Edit: 08/20/2011 08:55 pm by Tcommon »

Offline Lurker Steve

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1420
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 9
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #873 on: 08/20/2011 10:24 pm »
Half assed was putting the air ventilator on a manlift  vs a platform and nothing to do the ducting
What would you call the way the shuttle hose is hanging by a bungee cord that looks like it's half restricting it?

As a design engineer, you learn never to criticize another's design without also putting your own idea on the table for criticism. I get the sense that Jim isn't a design engineer.

Those air hoses are not placed by design engineers. That's a manufacturing engineer's job. Design engineers don't have anything to do with equipment that's not physically part of the spacecraft.  I don't know what Jim's job is, but from the pictures that he has shared, I can tell that he has been around plenty of launch vehicles and spacecraft in various stages of assembly.

Offline Tcommon

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 145
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #874 on: 08/20/2011 10:41 pm »
Half assed was putting the air ventilator on a manlift  vs a platform and nothing to do the ducting
What would you call the way the shuttle hose is hanging by a bungee cord that looks like it's half restricting it?

As a design engineer, you learn never to criticize another's design without also putting your own idea on the table for criticism. I get the sense that Jim isn't a design engineer.

Those air hoses are not placed by design engineers. That's a manufacturing engineer's job. Design engineers don't have anything to do with equipment that's not physically part of the spacecraft.  I don't know what Jim's job is, but from the pictures that he has shared, I can tell that he has been around plenty of launch vehicles and spacecraft in various stages of assembly.
So? How is that germane?

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #875 on: 08/21/2011 12:12 am »
Half assed was putting the air ventilator on a manlift  vs a platform and nothing to do the ducting
What would you call the way the shuttle hose is hanging by a bungee cord that looks like it's half restricting it?

Why must we go for pages of comments off one line from Jim?  Maybe Jim has a point or not.  Look maybe learn and move on.
 
 
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline arnezami

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 285
  • Liked: 267
  • Likes Given: 378
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #876 on: 08/21/2011 12:13 am »
Jim just needs a hug. And we all know it. Now lets move on.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7253
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2079
  • Likes Given: 2005
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #877 on: 08/21/2011 12:25 am »
Examining the photo more closely, it does not appear the MovinCool unit is on the scissor lift.  Instead it appears to be on a (black and red) mobile platform in front of the scissor lift.  Am I seeing that wrongly?
« Last Edit: 08/21/2011 12:27 am by sdsds »
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline N45deg

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Lazy Boy chair
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #878 on: 08/21/2011 01:01 am »
You are correct.  It is not on the Scissor lift. 
Hint: look at the railings.
« Last Edit: 08/21/2011 01:03 am by N45deg »

Offline arnezami

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 285
  • Liked: 267
  • Likes Given: 378
Re: SpaceX COTS Demo 2 Updates
« Reply #879 on: 08/21/2011 01:11 am »
And perhaps, colored navigation lights?

Btw. Are the red and blue lights for the ISS crew to easily see what the orientation of the dragon spacecraft (+trunk) is? Or is there another purpose for it?
« Last Edit: 08/21/2011 01:14 am by arnezami »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0