Author Topic: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 (Flight 2) - COTS-1 - Launch Updates - December 8, 2010  (Read 546775 times)

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
But there are 6 forward-facing Draco's. Perhaps the 2 remaining ones are kept in reserve, should the others overheat? 

Actually, while firing, RCS-scale thrusters don't overheat, they are well  cooled by propellant flow into them. It's only after cutoff that the hot nozzles conduct into the thrust chamber and attach points and the temp sensors rise.

Jim O
'Prop' console (OMS/RCS), STS-1, 2

 

It actually depends on the design if they have boundary layer cooling or not.   Even if they do, there are certainly duty cycles that they have tested against and likely cannot fire forever until the prop runs out (assuming the tanks aren't really small ;) )

Also, the number of thrusters provide redundancy Lars.
« Last Edit: 12/08/2010 05:37 pm by OV-106 »
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Offline rklaehn

  • interplanetary telemetry plumber
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1259
  • germany
  • Liked: 191
  • Likes Given: 318
I'm guessing that the forward pointing Draco thrusters are the ones doing the deorbit burn. (Due to the angle of the capsule walls, they would be the most efficient for the purpose)

Yes, that would make sense. The forward-pointing ones are the ones you would use for bigger maneuvers, since they have no "cosine losses" since they point exactly in flight direction.

Quote
But there are 6 forward-facing Draco's. Perhaps the 2 remaining ones are kept in reserve, should the others overheat?

They are probably for redundancy. If you need 4 engines in a symmetric pattern for a nominal reentry, having 6 gives you 1 engine out redundancy in any case.

Anyway: congratulations spacex!

Offline billh

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Houston
  • Liked: 1145
  • Likes Given: 830

Quote
Jim O
'Prop' console (OMS/RCS), STS-1, 2

Too cool for words :)

Yes, in the midst of all us "wannabees" it's nice to know we have a few "been there done thats"!

Offline Chris Bergin

About 20 minutes to expected splashdown.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0

I don't think we're at loss-of-signal until Dragon starts really hitting the atmosphere and ionizing the air. So, another 5 or so minutes until that.



If there antennas pointing "up" and are communicating through TDRSS there may not be an LOS.  Really don't know if this is the plan or not, just commenting. 
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Offline iamlucky13

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1659
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 95
But there are 6 forward-facing Draco's. Perhaps the 2 remaining ones are kept in reserve, should the others overheat?
I   surmise too that the 6-min burn with only 4 thrusters helps with lower Gs.  Astronauts  on board would be forward-facing, pressing outward against  the straps.

Not for this spacecraft. The Draco thrusters are small. 6 x 400 N thrusters = 2400 Newtons.

In a ~3000 kg spacecraft, that's 1/12th of a G. Sleeping on your stomach is more an an eyeballs-out situation.  :P

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Orbital is gonna be shocked when NASA suddenly stops returning their calls.

Hardly, with the shuttle retiring the ISS is going to need more supplies than Dragon could provide by itself.  Orbital is till the tortoise to SpaceX's hare. 

SpaceX,STS, Orbital, and ULA are all on the same team, making sure the US doesn't fall behind in it's ISS commitments.
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline brihath

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 891
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 28

Quote
Jim O
'Prop' console (OMS/RCS), STS-1, 2

Too cool for words :)

Yes, in the midst of all us "wannabees" it's nice to know we have a few "been there done thats"!

Not only that, he writes excellent books too!

Offline billh

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Houston
  • Liked: 1145
  • Likes Given: 830
SpaceX,STS, Orbital, and ULA are all on the same team, making sure the US doesn't fall behind in it's ISS commitments.

Here, here!!  ;D

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Must be passed EI by now.. entry then chutes...

Offline Chris Bergin

Standing by for any updates. Parachutes are scheduled to deploy in five minutes.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Hunts Villain

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 118
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 0
Getting video signal through Hawaii.

Offline iamlucky13

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1659
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 95
But there are 6 forward-facing Draco's. Perhaps the 2 remaining ones are kept in reserve, should the others overheat? 

Actually, while firing, RCS-scale thrusters don't overheat, they are well  cooled by propellant flow into them. It's only after cutoff that the hot nozzles conduct into the thrust chamber and attach points and the temp sensors rise.

Jim O
'Prop' console (OMS/RCS), STS-1, 2

 

It actually depends on the design if they have boundary layer cooling or not.   Even if they do, there are certainly duty cycles that they have tested against and likely cannot fire forever until the prop runs out (assuming the tanks aren't really small ;) )

Also, the number of thrusters provide redundancy Lars.

Well, SpaceX have tested these in a thermal vac chamber if I remember right, and this is one of their critical functions, so in this case, I'd hope they've designed a big margin against overheating for the de-orbit burn.

And I think Jim-O was talking more about the mechanical parts of the thruster upstream of the combustion chamber, not boundary layer cooling in the chamber and nozzle.

Offline spacetraveler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 26
Must be passed EI by now.. entry then chutes...
Main chute deploy in about 5 min according to NASA.

Offline dad2059

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 198
    • Dad2059's Webzine of Science-Fiction, Science Fact and Esoterica
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 4
SpaceX,STS, Orbital, and ULA are all on the same team, making sure the US doesn't fall behind in it's ISS commitments.

Here, here!!  ;D

Goes without sayin'. 8)
NASA needs some good ol' fashioned 'singularity tech'

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Standing by for any updates. Parachutes are scheduled to deploy in five minutes.

Is that estimate accurate? Seems to me it would be too early between a deorbit burn (assuming it wasn't a huge one) and being under parachutes...

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Getting video signal through Hawaii.

music to my ears

Offline Dave G

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3231
  • Liked: 2127
  • Likes Given: 2021
Getting video signal through Hawaii.
On the web? Where?

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
But there are 6 forward-facing Draco's. Perhaps the 2 remaining ones are kept in reserve, should the others overheat?
I   surmise too that the 6-min burn with only 4 thrusters helps with lower Gs.  Astronauts  on board would be forward-facing, pressing outward against  the straps.

Not for this spacecraft. The Draco thrusters are small. 6 x 400 N thrusters = 2400 Newtons.

In a ~3000 kg spacecraft, that's 1/12th of a G. Sleeping on your stomach is more an an eyeballs-out situation.  :P

It has little to do with g-forces on the crew(unless you burned so quickly you actually went balistic).  The thing just got launched to 17,000 mph in 9 minutes. 

You can deorbit any vehicle with any force given the appropriate length of time to apply it. 

It is all integrated and goes back to mission flight design, amount of prop, duty cycles the thrusters are capable of performing, TPS capability, structural loading for entry, etc
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1