Author Topic: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010  (Read 160946 times)

Offline Pedantic Twit

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #360 on: 12/04/2010 02:50 pm »

Offline Chris Bergin

Not sure if that was a nominal abort yet.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Pedantic Twit

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #362 on: 12/04/2010 02:51 pm »

Offline Silmfeanor

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1254
  • Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 403
  • Likes Given: 728
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #363 on: 12/04/2010 02:52 pm »
looked longer than the previous firing atleast, but still a lot of abort sounds on the radiowaves...

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #364 on: 12/04/2010 02:52 pm »
SpaceXMissions: "Reviewing data. Standby."

Offline Pedantic Twit

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #365 on: 12/04/2010 02:52 pm »
Everything looks good from here ;D

Offline jimvela

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1672
  • Liked: 921
  • Likes Given: 75
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #366 on: 12/04/2010 02:53 pm »
data being reviewed

Offline Chris Bergin

Reviewing data.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #368 on: 12/04/2010 02:53 pm »
"Wait for confirmation that we met all criteria for today's test"

... and there goes the webcast.
« Last Edit: 12/04/2010 02:54 pm by ugordan »

Offline js117

  • Member
  • Posts: 81
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #369 on: 12/04/2010 02:53 pm »
This test might have been ok

Offline Pedantic Twit

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #370 on: 12/04/2010 02:54 pm »
Big thumbs up!  8)
And the live video is gone.
« Last Edit: 12/04/2010 02:54 pm by Pedantic Twit »

Offline Silmfeanor

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1254
  • Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 403
  • Likes Given: 728
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #371 on: 12/04/2010 02:54 pm »
now an overlay with "static test fire complete " - it worked?

Offline e of pi

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 723
  • Pittsburgh, PA
  • Liked: 299
  • Likes Given: 406
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #372 on: 12/04/2010 02:55 pm »
Feed briefly displayed "Static Fire Complete," then went to SpaceX logo.

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #373 on: 12/04/2010 02:55 pm »
Thank you, SpaceX, for fixing the feed! Much better this time!
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline jabe

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Liked: 184
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #374 on: 12/04/2010 02:56 pm »
curious
if they do have to do another static fire test..for the first stage's TEA-TEB ignitor system, how do they recharge the system..is it unlimited?
jb

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #375 on: 12/04/2010 02:56 pm »
Orange flame means there were hydrocarbons burning as opposed to just TEA-TEB and LOX.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Offline Chris Bergin

Trick is not to fall into the trap a lot of sites did yesterday by assuming no word means it was a success.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Pedantic Twit

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #377 on: 12/04/2010 03:00 pm »
Orange flame means there were hydrocarbons burning as opposed to just TEA-TEB and LOX.

Just to reinforce that point, here's two pictures to compare.
Image #1 is quite clearly green. (it's the first I managed to grab with any sort of hot hot fire-type stuff)
Image #2 is quite clearly orange-yellowy.
« Last Edit: 12/04/2010 03:03 pm by Pedantic Twit »

Offline zaitcev

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 581
    • mee.nu:zaitcev:space
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #378 on: 12/04/2010 03:02 pm »
if they do have to do another static fire test..for the first stage's TEA-TEB ignitor system, how do they recharge the system..is it unlimited?
As far as I know, F9 has no TEA/TEB storage on the 1st stage, the nasty is fed directly from the ground (which always sounded weird for me due to the necessary length of pipes). They may have a sizeable supply, or not. It's not known how big the ground tank is. The 2nd stage has something like 3 cartridges mounted on MVac somewhere, but that's entirely unconnected.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010
« Reply #379 on: 12/04/2010 03:04 pm »
I don't think anyone's questioning whether they had ignition on all 3 attempts so far. The real question is if the engine parameters held up to T-0.

At least it looks like they solved the helium spin-start problem of F9-01, unless that solution contributed to engine 6's woes, that is.

BTW, the strongback is reported to have moved back to the rocket so it's probably over for today one way or another.
« Last Edit: 12/04/2010 03:07 pm by ugordan »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0