Author Topic: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 4, 2010  (Read 160963 times)

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #180 on: 12/03/2010 06:33 pm »
Targeting 20:00Z for a second and final attempt today.  Being conservative about completing data review from the first attempt, so may not make the range-imposed end-of-day.

If they can't make it today. Will they try again tomorrow? At what time?
« Last Edit: 12/03/2010 06:34 pm by yg1968 »

Offline jabe

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Liked: 184
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #181 on: 12/03/2010 06:37 pm »
High chamber pressure isn't new.. curious to see how much higher it was to accepted..previous aborts for high pressure was only slightly above accepted...
jb
« Last Edit: 12/03/2010 06:48 pm by jabe »

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6828
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 4046
  • Likes Given: 1744
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #182 on: 12/03/2010 06:37 pm »
20:00Z would be in what, ~23min?  Or am I doing something wrong?

~Jon

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6828
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 4046
  • Likes Given: 1744
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #183 on: 12/03/2010 06:38 pm »
And are they going to webcast the second attempt?

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #184 on: 12/03/2010 06:39 pm »
And are they going to webcast the second attempt?

U  mean stuttercast...:)

Offline Chris Bergin

And are they going to webcast the second attempt?

We don't think so. SpaceX have said nothing since: "Test sequence complete."
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #186 on: 12/03/2010 06:40 pm »
20:00Z would be in what, ~23min? 

Yes, it would.

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6828
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 4046
  • Likes Given: 1744
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #187 on: 12/03/2010 06:41 pm »
Well, in that case, I wish Tom and his team good luck on getting this sorted out and getting the second attempt off today.  Would be nice to watch, but I can understand them not bothering to webcast a second attempt, when most people (including myself) probably though the first one worked...

~Jon

Offline Hunts Villain

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 118
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #188 on: 12/03/2010 06:44 pm »
Range granting a 15 minute extension to the day.

Offline Halidon

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 848
  • whereabouts unknown
  • Liked: 180
  • Likes Given: 535
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #189 on: 12/03/2010 06:45 pm »


NRL
Ah! And now I smack myself on the forehead for not getting it sooner.
« Last Edit: 12/03/2010 06:45 pm by Halidon »

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #190 on: 12/03/2010 06:46 pm »
The other logo has a P-POD on it.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #191 on: 12/03/2010 06:46 pm »
Range granting a 15 minute extension to the day.

And people used to whine about the Air Force holding SpaceX back on purpose...

Offline SpaceX_MS

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
  • Liked: 10294
  • Likes Given: 138
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #192 on: 12/03/2010 06:46 pm »
Engine 6 was the problem.

Offline Kabloona

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4847
  • Velocitas Eradico
  • Fortress of Solitude
  • Liked: 3432
  • Likes Given: 741
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #193 on: 12/03/2010 06:50 pm »
Engine 6 was the problem.

What is corrective action? Or are limits just a little tight?

Offline Chris Bergin

Looks like there's some life in the webcast, sorta :)

http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline jabe

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Liked: 184
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #195 on: 12/03/2010 06:51 pm »
with all these retries on same day they should be learning alot about the nuances of the falcon 9 launch sequence :)

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #196 on: 12/03/2010 06:53 pm »
Looks like there's some life in the webcast, sorta :)

http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php

It must be arsenic based life because I only see the SpaceX logo... :)
« Last Edit: 12/03/2010 06:54 pm by yg1968 »

Offline Cog_in_the_machine

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1232
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Space Falcon 9 Flight 2 Static Fire - December 3, 2010
« Reply #197 on: 12/03/2010 06:56 pm »
Looks like there's some life in the webcast, sorta :)

http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php

It must be arsenic based life because I only see the SpaceX logo... :)

It's not just you.

By the way, SpaceX_MS, any idea what the third logo on the second stage is, the black one?
« Last Edit: 12/03/2010 07:44 pm by Cog_in_the_machine »
^^ Warning! Contains opinions. ^^ 

Offline Chris Bergin

Looks like there's some life in the webcast, sorta :)

http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php

It must be arsenic based life because I only see the SpaceX logo... :)

Yeah, I accidentially left the page up and noise started coming through the speakers. Went from reconnecting to buffering and then streamed for a few seconds and went off ???
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Chris Bergin

SCRUB for the day.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1