Author Topic: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?  (Read 20652 times)

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #20 on: 10/24/2010 06:15 am »
Neither, I'm guessing. But if they do, it will probably be based on whatever leftover spare hardware Energia might gave left lying around.

Offline sivodave

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #21 on: 10/27/2010 10:03 pm »
one question: have they any customer yet? if you're going to invest money in building a space station (also if small) it's always a lot of money you're going to spend and therefore you have already to be sure that you'll have customers who need this service...otherwise they risk to put in orbit something that will  never be used.


Offline Stan Black

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3135
  • Liked: 377
  • Likes Given: 228

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #23 on: 01/19/2011 08:03 pm »
http://www.rian.ru/video/20110119/323314411.html

It looks like the plan was to use the partially developed Node module with a Progress PAO as a free flying space station IF ISS were abandoned in 2015. Now that ISS is slated to continue past 2015, the only way this plan will work is if somehow somebody comes up with lots of rubles.

The graphics are better now in that they provide some indication of the scale of the vehicle, but they are still showing interior mockups of Service module class vehicles rather than the very cramped volume provided by the 3.3 meter Hub and 2.2 meter extension.

BTW, the video is on YouTube right here:



« Last Edit: 01/19/2011 08:08 pm by Danderman »

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #24 on: 08/18/2011 11:21 pm »
Here is another article and a video on this:
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/thinking-tech/vacation-aboard-planned-space-hotel-to-cost-1-million-video/8218

This is not entirely vaporware, as the basic structure is based on the ISS Node Module.
« Last Edit: 08/18/2011 11:24 pm by Danderman »

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #25 on: 08/19/2011 05:09 pm »
« Last Edit: 08/19/2011 05:11 pm by corrodedNut »

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37819
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22051
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #26 on: 08/19/2011 05:27 pm »
That interior is so atypical of Russian spacecraft

Offline Dmitry_V_home

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 516
  • City of Toglliatti, Samara region, Russia
  • Liked: 672
  • Likes Given: 135
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #27 on: 08/19/2011 06:56 pm »
The big question concerning this design for the Node/Commercial Space Station is the origin of the hardware used as the central node. It looks to have a diameter greater than 3 meters, but less than 4 meters, probably even less than 3.8 meters - so where did this come from? Its probably a propellant tank from some rocket, but what rocket has spherical tanks of this size that Energia would utilize?

May be oxidizer tank from the DM Block?

Offline Joris

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
  • Liked: 24
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #28 on: 08/19/2011 07:11 pm »
That interior is so atypical of Russian spacecraft

Their is indeed a non-Russian distinction between the ceiling/floor and sidewalls, and it's way to smooth.
JIMO would have been the first proper spaceship.

Offline baldusi

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8371
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Liked: 2555
  • Likes Given: 8365
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #29 on: 08/19/2011 08:42 pm »
There was an interview with a world class Russian designer that was contracted for many government designs. He's done the interior of the Sukhoi SuperJet 100, the PTK concept, and it looks a lot like this design.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #30 on: 08/20/2011 05:31 pm »
Here's the MAKS model of the Commercial Space Hotel, from the NK forum.

The entire mass of the hotel can't exceed 8 tons, even with the 3 ton PAO hanging off the back.  This model was presented by Orbital Technologies, the first I have heard of them since last year.


Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #31 on: 02/16/2015 05:11 pm »
It's back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sort of.


http://russianspaceweb.com/shm.html

Offline fregate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 939
  • Space Association of Australia
  • Melbourne Australia
  • Liked: 144
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #32 on: 02/19/2015 05:47 am »
It's back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sort of.


http://russianspaceweb.com/shm.html
Let's wait till MAKS-2015 in August, but I could not see a reason why they could not launch a more disent module on Proton-M LV (with mass up to 22.5 tones on LEO)
« Last Edit: 02/19/2015 05:48 am by fregate »
"Selene, the Moon. Selenginsk, an old town in Siberia: moon-rocket  town" Vladimir Nabokov

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Commercial Russian Space Platform in 2016?
« Reply #33 on: 02/19/2015 03:13 pm »
The problem with using an airlock/docking module combination is if the airlock doors fail, the transport spacecraft is not available to the crew anymore.

Airlocks should not be placed between the return spacecraft and the main station, they should be located where if a hatch fails (as they have), there is no danger to the crew. This requires a secondary hatch, ie an inner compartment, as a backup, just like the Airlock module on the US segment.

Although there is discussion of this 8 ton design for some space expedition, it really isn't suitable for that function.

« Last Edit: 02/19/2015 03:13 pm by Danderman »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0