Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 1 Updates  (Read 684626 times)

Offline Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8889
  • Liked: 4007
  • Likes Given: 373
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #740 on: 12/06/2010 08:37 pm »
A small bit of math tells me that the probability of an out-of-control Dragon that makes it to the ground intact hitting one of the people on this planet is about 1 in 4000.  And that's if everyone is outside unprotected by any shelter.

Offline hop

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
  • Liked: 553
  • Likes Given: 891
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #741 on: 12/06/2010 08:40 pm »
Would the shuttle come down in a stable, heat shield first configuration if it went out of control?
Seems unlikely, but I'm not sure an SSME powerhead would put much less of a dent in your day than an intact Dragon...

Offline boaorm

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 16
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #742 on: 12/06/2010 08:45 pm »
The list of arguments given by Spacex to FAA when asking for a waiver was (argument #1 kind of backs up Ms. Shotwells hope of an eventual break-up of the capsule n case of a non-controlled reentry:)

(as linked here: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=22769.msg666957#msg666957 )

1. Dragon's thermal protection system has been modified so that if it enters facing down it will burn and demise.

2. Dragon can keep orbiting in order to increase the probability of initiating a safe reentry.

3. Dragon will automatically vent its propellants if it is not able to reenter as planned. Venting occurs autonomously, but SpaceX has the ability to issue a back-up command from the ground.

4. In the case of a failed or degraded deorbit burn, Dragon automatically drains propellants and subsequently deploys its parachutes.

5. A ground command received through one of three receivers and through multiple RF links, via TDRSS and multiple ground stations, can command the venting of any remaining fuel and the draining of battery power to reduce the possibility of explosion or toxic fumes when Dragon lands.

6. Dragon has the ability to autonomously guide itself to a predetermined site located more than 780 km from the coastline.

7. Dragon has the ability to monitor its safety-critical systems in real-time.

8. Dragon has over 100% margin on both power and propellant budgets.

9. Dragon has a space-grade Inertial Measurement Unit and space-grade flight computer, both of which have extensive flight heritage including use on the International Space Station.

10. Dragon has redundant drogue parachutes and dual redundant main parachutes.

11. The vehicle's thrusters are plumbed such that Dragon can deorbit and reenter with the loss of any two entire propulsion modules.

12. The vehicle has backup capabilities within all of its major subsystems.


« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 08:53 pm by boaorm »

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39829
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25898
  • Likes Given: 12327
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #743 on: 12/06/2010 09:11 pm »
The list of arguments given by Spacex to FAA when asking for a waiver was (argument #1 kind of backs up Ms. Shotwells hope of an eventual break-up of the capsule n case of a non-controlled reentry:)

(as linked here: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=22769.msg666957#msg666957 )
...
Thank you very much!
Quote
6. Dragon has the ability to autonomously guide itself to a predetermined site located more than 780 km from the coastline.
...
That's an interesting one. So, under what circumstance would Dragon autonomously land in the ocean?
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8679
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3911
  • Likes Given: 814
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #744 on: 12/06/2010 09:15 pm »
Press kit:

Offline tobi453

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 250
  • Liked: 81
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #745 on: 12/06/2010 09:18 pm »
Oh, look at the Isp Values! Second stage engine only 336s!!!
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 09:19 pm by tobi453 »

Offline Swatch

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 275
  • Official Aerospace Engineer as of June 13th, 2009
  • Cincinnati
    • ProjectApollo/NASSP: Virtual Systems and Flight Simulation of the Apollo Program
  • Liked: 52
  • Likes Given: 19
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #746 on: 12/06/2010 09:21 pm »
A little apples and oranges.  SpaceX does these things late in the flow.

Quite. I can understand reviewing just the static fire data this late in the game, but the vehicle has been sitting integrated for what - months?

http://twitpic.com/3dk7i2

I would think it would be normal to give everything one last glance as you're closing everything up.  Also, they did static fire recently.
Ex-Rocket Scientist in Training, now Rocket Scientist!
M-F trying to make the world of the future a smaller place through expanding horizons...

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39829
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25898
  • Likes Given: 12327
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #747 on: 12/06/2010 09:33 pm »
Oh, look at the Isp Values! Second stage engine only 336s!!!
That's compared to 342s for the predicted Isp. Not terribly different, IMHO... Overly-optimistic predicted performance for a rocket engine seems to be par for the course. You should never trust a quoted Isp at least until that engine has seen a mission or two.

In the case of Merlin Vacuum, it hadn't even been test-fired in a vacuum before Falcon 9 first launched.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline joshcryer

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #748 on: 12/06/2010 09:51 pm »
SpaceX answering questions: http://www.facebook.com/SpaceX/posts/173436672676788

Nothing we haven't already seen in this thread, just thought it was noteworthy.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8679
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3911
  • Likes Given: 814
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #749 on: 12/06/2010 09:56 pm »
SpaceX answering questions: http://www.facebook.com/SpaceX/posts/173436672676788

Nothing we haven't already seen in this thread, just thought it was noteworthy.

Including one individual who's not overly interested in the launch, rather she wants to know if Eric will come back home from sea (presumably crewing one of the recovery vessels) for her birthday.

You gotta love Facebook. Or not.


Offline Retired Downrange

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 977
  • Turks & Caicos Islands
  • Liked: 121
  • Likes Given: 153
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #750 on: 12/06/2010 10:01 pm »
The Merlin vacuum expansion nozzle used on the second stage measures nine feet tall.

There is a photo of this nozzle on page ten of the press kit.

Offline joshcryer

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #751 on: 12/06/2010 10:18 pm »
Including one individual who's not overly interested in the launch, rather she wants to know if Eric will come back home from sea (presumably crewing one of the recovery vessels) for her birthday.

You gotta love Facebook. Or not.

Eh, grad student, I'll give her a pass. I just have been observing that the FB updates are more frequent than the Twitter updates. Maybe because the person doing them is using it as an excuse to check FB, who cares. :)

If you're really wanting to keep up, keep the SpaceX FB page open and the SpaceXer Twitter feed open (plus SpaceXMissions), you'll see them update in real time. It's really fun stuff.

Offline 2552

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 522
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #752 on: 12/06/2010 10:27 pm »
http://twitter.com/#!/NASAKennedy
Quote
SpaceX now says the Falcon 9 rocket launch for NASA's COTS program is no earlier than Wednesday. Earlier it was estimated to be Thursday.

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39829
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25898
  • Likes Given: 12327
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #753 on: 12/06/2010 10:32 pm »
http://twitter.com/#!/NASAKennedy
Quote
SpaceX now says the Falcon 9 rocket launch for NASA's COTS program is no earlier than Wednesday. Earlier it was estimated to be Thursday.
On Facebook, SpaceX still says Thursday:
"Now targeting launch no earlier than this Thursday, Dec. 9. Taking some time to look at 2nd stage nozzle, will keep you posted on schedule as able--thanks for the support!"
http://www.facebook.com/SpaceX/posts/173436672676788
3 hours ago
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 10:33 pm by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39829
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25898
  • Likes Given: 12327
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #754 on: 12/06/2010 10:38 pm »
http://twitter.com/#!/NASAKennedy
Quote
SpaceX now says the Falcon 9 rocket launch for NASA's COTS program is no earlier than Wednesday. Earlier it was estimated to be Thursday.
On Facebook, SpaceX still says Thursday:
"Now targeting launch no earlier than this Thursday, Dec. 9. Taking some time to look at 2nd stage nozzle, will keep you posted on schedule as able--thanks for the support!"
http://www.facebook.com/SpaceX/posts/173436672676788
3 hours ago
More recently on Facebook (in response to that post http://www.facebook.com/SpaceX/posts/173436672676788 ):
Quote from: SpaceX
‎@Ben, thanks for the help ;) @Muttley, Ben is correct, we take closeout photos as part of our final review process and the engineers want to take a look at the 2nd stage nozzle. @Gregg, you are also correct, NASA has said as early as Wednesday, but we need more details before we can really make a call. @Lars, not sure how long that takes or if its necessary here, but we'll keep you updated on the schedule as we hear--thansk everyone!
about an hour ago ·

And also, it looks like they're inspecting the nozzle while the rocket is still raised:
http://twitpic.com/3dk7i2
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 10:44 pm by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline joshcryer

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #755 on: 12/06/2010 10:43 pm »
I think it's still too early to say whether or not they can get it flown on Wednesday, I hope so, but I'm not holding my breath.

Offline rdale

  • Assistant to the Chief Meteorologist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10472
  • Lansing MI
  • Liked: 1556
  • Likes Given: 188
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #756 on: 12/06/2010 10:55 pm »
I think it's still too early to say whether or not they can get it flown on Wednesday

Josh - how is the analysis going so far? Is there a particular area you think could be the cause of a NET Thursday versus Wednesday?

Offline KSC Engineer

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #757 on: 12/06/2010 11:17 pm »
Nice looking patch.   Does anyone know the derivation of the Dragon symbol and logo?

Um . . . what? It's a dragon.  ???

Right above the word SpaceX on their patch is a dragon which is their nomenclature and name for their spacecraft.   I was wondering if anyone knew the derivation of the dragon name, why they selected that name etc?  Just curious.

Offline MP99

Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #758 on: 12/06/2010 11:21 pm »
Press kit:

Quote
The result is the most advanced heat shield ever to fly, it can potentially be used hundreds of times for Earth orbit reentry with only minor degradation each time (like an extreme version of a Formula 1 car's carbon brakepads) and can even withstand the much higher heat of a moon or Mars velocity reentry.

"potentially be used hundreds of times for Earth orbit reentry" - I had not realised that!

cheers, Martin

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #759 on: 12/06/2010 11:23 pm »
Right above the word SpaceX on their patch is a dragon which is their nomenclature and name for their spacecraft.   I was wondering if anyone knew the derivation of the dragon name, why they selected that name etc?  Just curious.

Really, I'm not kidding.
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 11:23 pm by corrodedNut »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0