Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 1 Updates  (Read 651051 times)

Offline joshcryer

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #700 on: 12/06/2010 06:22 pm »
kevin-rf, very true, they caught it during QC. Felt silly after writing that, but you of course know I meant in the manufacture stage. I just can't think of what could cause that issue during shipping or during the test fires, glad they caught it, and it does indicate that their QC is good so far.

Offline dsmillman

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1483
  • Liked: 342
  • Likes Given: 27
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #701 on: 12/06/2010 06:29 pm »
It was mentioned during the briefing that there is a press kit available for this flight.  Does anyone have a URL for the press kit?

Offline stockman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6916
  • Southern Ontario - Canada
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #702 on: 12/06/2010 06:30 pm »
press breifing now over
One Percent for Space!!!

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #703 on: 12/06/2010 06:31 pm »
SpaceX thanks NASA at the end.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #704 on: 12/06/2010 06:31 pm »
I'll second that. It looks like the press kit has the patch for this mission printed on the front page.

Edit: here's the patch: http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum18/HTML/000601.html#spacex_f9cots1patch01

Obligatory four-leaf clover included, we'll see if it pays off.
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 06:35 pm by ugordan »

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #705 on: 12/06/2010 06:33 pm »
There was a lot of tough questions from the reporters. Some good questions but not too many soft balls.
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 06:34 pm by yg1968 »

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #706 on: 12/06/2010 06:34 pm »
There was a lot of tough questions from the reporters. Some good questions but not too many soft balls.
I don't understand that. I mean, why does SpaceX get treated that way when NASA doesn't?
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline rdale

  • Assistant to the Chief Meteorologist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • Lansing MI
  • Liked: 1458
  • Likes Given: 175
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #707 on: 12/06/2010 06:36 pm »
There was a lot of tough questions from the reporters. Some good questions but not too many soft balls.
I don't understand that. I mean, why does SpaceX get treated that way when NASA doesn't?

Can you give an example of the type of question asked here that you don't hear asked at a shuttle presser?

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #708 on: 12/06/2010 06:37 pm »
Edit: here's the patch: http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum18/HTML/000601.html#spacex_f9cots1patch01

Obligatory four-leaf clover included, we'll see if it pays off.

Would the 3 stars signify the 3 piggybacked payloads?

Offline KSC Engineer

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #709 on: 12/06/2010 06:40 pm »
Nice looking patch.   Does anyone know the derivation of the Dragon symbol and logo?

Offline Herb Schaltegger

Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #710 on: 12/06/2010 06:42 pm »
Nice looking patch.   Does anyone know the derivation of the Dragon symbol and logo?

Um . . . what? It's a dragon.  ???
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #711 on: 12/06/2010 06:42 pm »
Edit: here's the patch: http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum18/HTML/000601.html#spacex_f9cots1patch01

Obligatory four-leaf clover included, we'll see if it pays off.

Would the 3 stars signify the 3 piggybacked payloads?
Here's the previous Press Kit (for inaugural Falcon 9 flight):
http://www.nbbd.com/events/spacex/100604-Falcon9PressKit.pdf
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline kking

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 121
  • Topmost, Kentucky
  • Liked: 10
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #712 on: 12/06/2010 06:44 pm »
Jay Barbree had tough questions. Somebody mentioned the press kit. Is it online anywhere. I just checked NASA and Spacex homepage neither had it listed.

Kyle

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #713 on: 12/06/2010 06:44 pm »
There was a lot of tough questions from the reporters. Some good questions but not too many soft balls.
I don't understand that. I mean, why does SpaceX get treated that way when NASA doesn't?

Can you give an example of the type of question asked here that you don't hear asked at a shuttle presser?

A lot of questions were about the costs of the COTS program. You don't hear those kind of questions for Shuttle. But I think that the questions about costs are fair given the fact that commmercial companies are said to be cheaper. The criticism about SpaceX not being open enough with reporters was also fair. Gwynne Shotwell, President of SpaceX, said that they will try to improve on that.
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 06:47 pm by yg1968 »

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #714 on: 12/06/2010 06:47 pm »
Jay Barbree had tough questions.

It's no secret he isn't exactly the greatest supporter of "commercial space". Since this wasn't about crewed launches, he did tone it down from his usual.

Offline RocketEconomist327

  • Rocket Economist
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 812
  • Infecting the beltway with fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets.
  • Liked: 96
  • Likes Given: 62
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #715 on: 12/06/2010 06:50 pm »
A lot of questions were about the costs of the COTS program? You don't hear those kind of questions for Shuttle. But I think that the questions about costs are fair given the fact that commmercial companies are said to be cheaper. The criticism about SpaceX not being open enough with reporters were also fair. Gwynne Shotwell, President of SpaceX, admitted that they will try to improve on that.
My Emphasis... Because we all know just how open, honest, and forthcoming the NASA PAO is, right?

Communication, whether in a business, a relationship, or marriage is the number one cause of failure.  We all want to communicate better.  I am sure SpaceX will.  That being said, NASA is not very good at all.  That other website does a great job of providing a historical record on the level of fail of the PAO at NASA.

This is not directed at you yg but me thinking out loud.  If it comes off looking like that, I am sorry.

VR
RE327
You can talk about all the great things you can do, or want to do, in space; but unless the rocket scientists get a sound understanding of economics (and quickly), the US space program will never achieve the greatness it should.

Putting my money where my mouth is.

Offline rdale

  • Assistant to the Chief Meteorologist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • Lansing MI
  • Liked: 1458
  • Likes Given: 175
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #716 on: 12/06/2010 06:50 pm »
A lot of questions were about the costs of the COTS program. You don't hear those kind of questions for Shuttle.

You may not but I do... Every time we have a delay somebody asks about the cost. Then the answerer says "it costs the same no matter what." Not a lot to talk about otherwise, I'm not sure that qualifies as a "tough question"?

Offline joshcryer

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 186
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #717 on: 12/06/2010 06:51 pm »
I uploaded the full conference here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=R0XO807T

Don't feel like doing an edit and uploading to YouTube.

Offline John44

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3887
  • Netherlands
    • space-multimedia
  • Liked: 258
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #718 on: 12/06/2010 06:52 pm »
NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation Services 1, Falcon 9 L-1 Pre-launch News Briefing
http://www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6323

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17540
  • Liked: 7278
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #719 on: 12/06/2010 06:57 pm »
A lot of questions were about the costs of the COTS program. You don't hear those kind of questions for Shuttle.

You may not but I do... Every time we have a delay somebody asks about the cost. Then the answerer says "it costs the same no matter what." Not a lot to talk about otherwise, I'm not sure that qualifies as a "tough question"?

Maybe not that one. But the question about what would happen if Dragon failed and fell back on earth was a tough question. Jay Barbaree's question about flying over Europe was another tough question.
« Last Edit: 12/06/2010 07:10 pm by yg1968 »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0