Author Topic: SpaceX COTS Demo 1 Updates  (Read 651037 times)

Online Nate_Trost

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
  • Liked: 47
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #440 on: 11/16/2010 07:19 pm »
I thought the long-pole in the turnaround was going to be the SRB boats for attempting first-stage recovery.

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #441 on: 11/16/2010 11:25 pm »
It is. 7 days after Shuttle launch to tow them back in, unload, and go back out.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Offline beancounter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1249
  • Perth, Western Australia
  • Liked: 106
  • Likes Given: 172
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #442 on: 11/17/2010 12:15 am »
It is. 7 days after Shuttle launch to tow them back in, unload, and go back out.

Surely there're other boats available!?
Beancounter from DownUnder

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #443 on: 11/17/2010 12:34 am »

Surely there're other boats available!?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?

Offline Namechange User

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7301
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #444 on: 11/17/2010 12:37 am »

Surely there're other boats available!?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?

37.  ;)
« Last Edit: 11/17/2010 12:38 am by OV-106 »
Enjoying viewing the forum a little better now by filtering certain users.

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8894
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60677
  • Likes Given: 1333
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #445 on: 11/17/2010 01:16 am »
 Would SpaceX delay the flight just because they wouldn't be able to recover the 1st stage?
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline arkaska

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3042
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #446 on: 11/17/2010 01:43 am »
Most likely since recovering the 1st (and later even the 2nd) stage is a big part in making the launches cheap.

Offline butters

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2402
  • Liked: 1701
  • Likes Given: 609
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #447 on: 11/17/2010 11:55 am »
Most likely since recovering the 1st (and later even the 2nd) stage is a big part in making the launches cheap.

More likely since recovering the first stage is a big part of their plans to refine the design and margins of the vehicle over time.  They'd like to enable reuse most likely starting with the thrust structure, but at this point in time the engineering analysis is the most important reason for recovery.  They need that data to see if they can tease some more mass and cost out of that stage.  It's probably a bit of a "battleship" construction right now to hedge the risk of an embarrassing failure.

Offline Dave G

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3231
  • Liked: 2127
  • Likes Given: 2021
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #448 on: 11/17/2010 01:05 pm »
... at this point in time the engineering analysis is the most important reason for recovery.  They need that data to see if they can tease some more mass and cost out of that stage.  It's probably a bit of a "battleship" construction right now to hedge the risk of an embarrassing failure.
Exactly.

Reuse is secondary at the moment.

Offline iamlucky13

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1659
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 95
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #449 on: 11/17/2010 07:38 pm »
Would SpaceX delay the flight just because they wouldn't be able to recover the 1st stage?

I think it would be more apt to ask why wouldn't they? Seven days isn't that much of a delay, and they have no hard deadline on this launch.

That means nothing by itself, but combined with the performance evaluation it could allow and potential for eventual re-use, it seems well-worth it.

Offline beancounter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1249
  • Perth, Western Australia
  • Liked: 106
  • Likes Given: 172
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #450 on: 11/18/2010 03:26 am »

Surely there're other boats available!?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?
Well yes I understand the comment about boats and boosters but some time ago, there was a photo showing a floating pontoon arrangment for recovering the F9 1st stage.  Looked like all you really needed was a tow boat.  So again, surely there's something else available that would suit?
Beancounter from DownUnder

Offline SpacexULA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
  • Liked: 53
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #451 on: 11/18/2010 03:59 am »

Surely there're other boats available!?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?
Well yes I understand the comment about boats and boosters but some time ago, there was a photo showing a floating pontoon arrangment for recovering the F9 1st stage.  Looked like all you really needed was a tow boat.  So again, surely there's something else available that would suit?

Just out of curiosity, is the reason SpaceX is using the SRB recovery teams because of some type of special licence so they have to fly closer to the incoming 1st stage (like catching a fly ball in baseball), or is it just their experience in finding spent 1st stages?

How close can the boat get to the projected spashdown point before it impacts?
No Bucks no Buck Rogers, but at least Flexible path gets you Twiki.

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #452 on: 11/18/2010 04:17 am »
Size-wise the F9 first stage is very close to an SRB, so it makes sense to use the services of a ship capable of recovering similar hardware.

Offline beancounter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1249
  • Perth, Western Australia
  • Liked: 106
  • Likes Given: 172
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #453 on: 11/18/2010 06:54 am »
Size-wise the F9 first stage is very close to an SRB, so it makes sense to use the services of a ship capable of recovering similar hardware.

On the other hand, we're all making the assumption that the 1st stage comes down in one piece otherwise all you might need is a 'tinnie' (small aluminium boat with outboard) to recover the pieces! LOL.

Joking aside, here's all the best to them.
Beancounter from DownUnder

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #454 on: 11/18/2010 11:35 am »

Surely there're other boats available!?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?
Well yes I understand the comment about boats and boosters but some time ago, there was a photo showing a floating pontoon arrangment for recovering the F9 1st stage.  Looked like all you really needed was a tow boat.  So again, surely there's something else available that would suit?

How many boat crews in the world do you think that are experienced in retrieving boosters

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #455 on: 11/18/2010 11:41 am »

Well yes I understand the comment about boats and boosters but some time ago, there was a photo showing a floating pontoon arrangment for recovering the F9 1st stage.  Looked like all you really needed was a tow boat.  So again, surely there's something else available that would suit?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?  Not just towing but strapped to the side of the boat (see a boat with a retrieved SRB), have deck space and crane for the pontoon, can support divers, have a propulsion system to navigate with a  SRB strapped to the side of the boat, can navigate the shallow Banana River..... need I add more?

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #456 on: 11/18/2010 11:42 am »
Just out of curiosity, is the reason SpaceX is using the SRB recovery teams because of some type of special licence

no such thing

Offline beancounter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1249
  • Perth, Western Australia
  • Liked: 106
  • Likes Given: 172
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #457 on: 11/19/2010 12:20 am »

Well yes I understand the comment about boats and boosters but some time ago, there was a photo showing a floating pontoon arrangment for recovering the F9 1st stage.  Looked like all you really needed was a tow boat.  So again, surely there's something else available that would suit?

How many boats in the world do you think that are setup to retrieve boosters?  Not just towing but strapped to the side of the boat (see a boat with a retrieved SRB), have deck space and crane for the pontoon, can support divers, have a propulsion system to navigate with a  SRB strapped to the side of the boat, can navigate the shallow Banana River..... need I add more?

Salvage is salvage.  If you want to make it difficult and expensive go right ahead but my old man worked in marine salvage most of his life and I learnt a great deal about it before heading into beancounting.
It's not that difficult.  Dangerous at times, yes, but difficult generally no.  You don't need special gear for navigation, propulsion and the like.  An experienced operator doesn't need all that.  They use their experience and skill.  As for shallow winding rivers, give me a break, they exist in other parts of the world. 
An empty booster's just that, nothing special so don't try to keep perpetuating old myths to keep things expensive.  They don't have to be like that.
Normally you make a lot of sense Jim and I have great respect for your comments but here on this one, you're just plain wrong.  Might be the existing old way.  Doesn't have to be the future.
Beancounter from DownUnder

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #458 on: 11/19/2010 11:13 am »


Salvage is salvage.  If you want to make it difficult and expensive go right ahead but my old man worked in marine salvage most of his life and I learnt a great deal about it before heading into beancounting.
It's not that difficult.  Dangerous at times, yes, but difficult generally no.  You don't need special gear for navigation, propulsion and the like.  An experienced operator doesn't need all that.  They use their experience and skill.  As for shallow winding rivers, give me a break, they exist in other parts of the world. 
An empty booster's just that, nothing special so don't try to keep perpetuating old myths to keep things expensive.  They don't have to be like that.
Normally you make a lot of sense Jim and I have great respect for your comments but here on this one, you're just plain wrong.  Might be the existing old way.  Doesn't have to be the future.

No, I am not wrong.   This is not salvage, it is recovery.  Salvage is not concerned with saving fit, form and function.  Salvage is only concerned with saving the materials.

It is not a shallow river, it is a lagoon with manatees.  The SRB ships use jet propulsion while in the lagoon.  What special navigation equipment?  Never said about that, however, the SRB ships do have special gear for tracking the boosters.  And they have the existing hardware for recovering parachutes.

As for an empty booster, you don't really know what is involved with the recovery. 

"experienced operator doesn't need all that.  They use their experience and skill."   That is why the SRB ships are being used. 

Also, more importantly, Spacex doesn't have to pay to train or maintain the service. Nor do they have to pay to reserve the time for the service, only when they actually use it.   The service exists and when it is not working a shuttle mission, it is available.
« Last Edit: 11/19/2010 11:18 am by Jim »

Offline tobi453

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 250
  • Liked: 81
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: COTS Demo 1
« Reply #459 on: 11/19/2010 02:40 pm »
So what will SpaceX do, when the shuttle retires?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0