A privately-owned rocket launched from Cape Canaveral in Florida on its first test flight is believed to be responsible.But Doug Moffett from UFO Research NSW says he has a few problems with this theory."Firstly, the time of the launch was 18.45 GMT, which translates to 4.45am EST, the duration of the flight was 9 minutes 38 seconds - this is a full hour before the reported sightings," he said."Secondly, where was the glow from the boosters or from the friction created by the craft moving through the atmosphere, where was the tail of the rocket?"Thirdly, why would anyone launch a rocket on a maiden test flight with a trajectory that would take it over the most heavily populated parts of Australia?"And how big must this rocket have been to be seen so clearly, at the same time, over such a vast distance?"
Don't want to start a new thread for a couple pictures, so I'll just put these here. I wasn't able to make it to the launch today due to last minute family problem, but these were provided to me and permission given for posting by Alan Walters - Photograher, visit his website for some other fantastic space shots.http://awaltersphoto.com/
Quote from: butters on 06/05/2010 12:38 amI was also impressed by the plume convergence on the first stage. From the long-range tracking cameras one could hardly tell there were multiple engines firing.You're impressed with turbulence?
I was also impressed by the plume convergence on the first stage. From the long-range tracking cameras one could hardly tell there were multiple engines firing.
Quote from: lsullivan411 on 06/05/2010 04:26 amDon't want to start a new thread for a couple pictures, so I'll just put these here. I wasn't able to make it to the launch today due to last minute family problem, but these were provided to me and permission given for posting by Alan Walters - Photograher, visit his website for some other fantastic space shots.http://awaltersphoto.com/Thanks, currently have one of those as my desktop!
Quote from: SpaceDave on 06/04/2010 07:31 pmQuote from: Jim on 06/04/2010 07:09 pmFalcon 9 is no longer a paper rocketNASA just got a Delta II replacement.Will need more history than 1 launch, but a good and necessary first step. In the meantime, expect more Minotaur launches.One flight was all NASA needs to use. They already are on contract.
Quote from: Jim on 06/04/2010 07:09 pmFalcon 9 is no longer a paper rocketNASA just got a Delta II replacement.Will need more history than 1 launch, but a good and necessary first step. In the meantime, expect more Minotaur launches.
Falcon 9 is no longer a paper rocketNASA just got a Delta II replacement.
I'm not sure whether that means they were already on contract before the launch, or that this successful launch activates some clause in their COTS or CRS contracts.
I don't see any spacex on that site.
Quote from: Jim on 06/05/2010 11:28 amI don't see any spacex on that site.http://awaltersphoto.com/Space/SpaceX-Falcon-9/12437649_frzZh#890461262_WdcTyit was buried under the category, SPACE ;-)
Quote from: cro-magnon gramps on 06/05/2010 04:02 pmQuote from: Jim on 06/05/2010 11:28 amI don't see any spacex on that site.http://awaltersphoto.com/Space/SpaceX-Falcon-9/12437649_frzZh#890461262_WdcTyit was buried under the category, SPACE ;-) It wasn't there earlier, though.
It appears that Falcon 9 may have been visible over eastern Australia in the pre-draw sky as a rotating spiral while on its way to completing its first orbit.The times of the sightings, direction and speed of travel, etc, all seem to correlate nicely between eyewitness reports and the predicted position of Falcon 9 (see below).Orbital Elements:DRAGON/FALCON 9 R/B 1 36595U 10026A 10155.91803255 .00078673 32520-5 10000-3 0 412 36595 34.4959 40.7086 0023426 215.5471 255.2519 16.05715940 20Pass for Sydney, Australia:Location: Sydney (151.1949° E, 33.8883° S)Time zone: UTCTime Satellite Azm Elv Mag Range S.Azm S.Elv--------------------------------------------------------------------------2010-06-05 19:40:45 DRAGON/FALCON 9 R/B 290.7 15.0 ecl 823 72.5 -14.92010-06-05 19:42:06 DRAGON/FALCON 9 R/B 339.2 24.5 ? 580 72.4 -14.72010-06-05 19:43:27 DRAGON/FALCON 9 R/B 27.6 15.1 ? 824 72.2 -14.4Here is a link to ABC New article of the sighting (included photos):http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/05/2919095.htmArmature video of the sighting can be found here:http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/201006/r579024_3626764.asxPerhaps the "spiral" appearance may offer some clues to the reason rotation / roll observed late in the flight?
The appearance and timing of this "spiral" appears consistent, to my eyes, with a Merlin Vacuum restart. The spiral suggests either that the roll control issue was related to the Merlin burn and that a second burn was occurring during the video, or, if the spiral was not imaged during a burn, that the stage was unable to control the roll even after the Merlin shut down.
I'm of the opinion a MVac exhaust plume during operation would not be that constrained, also the burn was way too small for this. It might be propellant blowdown after the MVac restart (attempt ?) and with an already tumbling stage. Even if there was attitude control during the coast and restart (something I'm increasingly wondering about), it was probably shutdown at that point.
Quote from: alexw on 06/05/2010 12:31 amQuote from: gladiator1332 on 06/05/2010 12:18 amQuoteCNN reported that NASA in conjuction with SpaceX launched the first private jet Falcon 9 on Friday, June 4. I'm going with CNN, since NASA does have contracts in place with SpaceX. I also used Wikipedia Falcon 9 as an information resource and previous interviews I personally observed with Elon Musk. CNN reported it, so it HAS to be true. Someone should probably let Dassault know about their new product line! -AlexObviously journalism no longer up to high standards ...
Quote from: gladiator1332 on 06/05/2010 12:18 amQuoteCNN reported that NASA in conjuction with SpaceX launched the first private jet Falcon 9 on Friday, June 4. I'm going with CNN, since NASA does have contracts in place with SpaceX. I also used Wikipedia Falcon 9 as an information resource and previous interviews I personally observed with Elon Musk. CNN reported it, so it HAS to be true. Someone should probably let Dassault know about their new product line! -Alex
QuoteCNN reported that NASA in conjuction with SpaceX launched the first private jet Falcon 9 on Friday, June 4. I'm going with CNN, since NASA does have contracts in place with SpaceX. I also used Wikipedia Falcon 9 as an information resource and previous interviews I personally observed with Elon Musk. CNN reported it, so it HAS to be true.
CNN reported that NASA in conjuction with SpaceX launched the first private jet Falcon 9 on Friday, June 4. I'm going with CNN, since NASA does have contracts in place with SpaceX. I also used Wikipedia Falcon 9 as an information resource and previous interviews I personally observed with Elon Musk.
Uneducated Guesses/TheoriesI have a couple of possible explanations for the roll during the upper stage burn. 1) We all saw the violent 90-degree roll the vehicle made at launch and the flame from the LOX line as it dropped away (probably the residual GOX igniting the hot exhaust gasses and burning away). I wonder if the roll tore the lox hose connection loose and it was still attached the vehicle. During the ascent, the valve may have loosened (it was never suppose to remain closed with the hose attached in flight, after all) and oxygen started leaking out, creating a slight off-axis thrust from the partially-open valve.2) IIRC, the Merlin turbopump exhaust feeds into the engine bell. Maybe that was creating a spiraling gas flow through the expansion nozzle, creating a slight rolling impulse.
I think (and this is just my opinion) that there was a leak related to the umbilical issue and it leaked all the way to orbit. Possibly causing the roll issue and/or the "spiral" phenomenon.