Author Topic: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates  (Read 92663 times)

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #100 on: 03/09/2010 06:03 pm »
Any opinions on the scorch marks? Are they really scorch marks, or just soot or maybe charred cork? Recent opinion seemed to be that the cork had been stripped off before the test.

I don't know, of course, but my guess that it is soot from the flame as the gas generators discharged.  There is possibly some thermal damage to the surface of the TPS but nothing more than that.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #101 on: 03/09/2010 06:03 pm »

Now we wait for the press conference/news release.

Press conference? They didn't even webcast the so-called testfire!

Well it didn't blow up so they have something positive to say. We will see.
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #102 on: 03/09/2010 06:05 pm »
Anybody got a short video clip of the terminal sequence they can post?

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #103 on: 03/09/2010 06:06 pm »
The shutdown on Merlins causes a lot of soot and black smoke. What I'm wondering about is how come the pad deluge wasn't working then, it looks as though it was activated too early. The fire on the engine fairing looked scary.

Offline HarryM

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
  • California
  • Liked: 40
  • Likes Given: 41
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #104 on: 03/09/2010 06:06 pm »
Did SpaceX do similar short duration hotfire tests in Texas, and do we have video of these tests to compare to?

I am not convince it was a "total" failure. The proof will be in a SpaceX press release if it was a success, or lack of one if it was less than 100%.

Also remember they managed to quick turn the Falcon 1 on a pad abort, launching in the same window. If this was an abortive hotfire, maybe they will try again.


Offline dmc6960

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 277
  • Liked: 34
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #105 on: 03/09/2010 06:06 pm »
Here is a slightly choppy video of test.  May be smoother than some people saw on the live stream though. (The KSC stream that is).
-Jim

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #106 on: 03/09/2010 06:07 pm »
Is it possible to guess whether they are contemplating a second attempt based on the current venting? I believe they have the range until 3:00PM
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #107 on: 03/09/2010 06:08 pm »
Here is a slightly choppy video of test.  May be smoother than some people saw on the live stream though. (The KSC stream that is).
Thanks.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #108 on: 03/09/2010 06:09 pm »
The smoke was generated by gas generator fuel burning off (since this ignites before other parts of the engine). It was black becasue it was fuel (rp1) rich. The main jet (combustion chamber) did not ignite.

Can you please stop making these statements as a matter-of-fact when you have no supporting evidence.

Offline JMS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Liked: 124
  • Likes Given: 78
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #109 on: 03/09/2010 06:11 pm »
SFN calling scrub.

Offline bad_astra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
  • Liked: 316
  • Likes Given: 554
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #110 on: 03/09/2010 06:12 pm »
The smoke was generated by gas generator fuel burning off (since this ignites before other parts of the engine). It was black becasue it was fuel (rp1) rich. The main jet (combustion chamber) did not ignite.

Can you please stop making these statements as a matter-of-fact when you have no supporting evidence.

There was never main ignition. It looks pretty obvious.
"Contact Light" -Buzz Aldrin

Offline FinalFrontier

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
  • Space Watcher
  • Liked: 1332
  • Likes Given: 173
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #111 on: 03/09/2010 06:12 pm »
Is it possible to guess whether they are contemplating a second attempt based on the current venting? I believe they have the range until 3:00PM
If it was a minor issue then yes. If it was a bad sensor, as minor as that is, then no as the sensor must be replaced. If it was more serious, such as a turbopump drive failure or start failure, then no. Regardless, unless they can attempt again today or in the next week and a half this will result in a good sized slip in the launch date. Probably end of April. Not sure if the first COTS flight will occur this year.
3-30-2017: The start of a great future
"Live Long and Prosper"

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #112 on: 03/09/2010 06:14 pm »
There was never main ignition. It looks pretty obvious.

Define "main ignition" and on what do you base that statement? It certainly didn't achieve significant thrust, but to say the chambers never ignited is lacking in evidence. What set that fireball on fire then? As per Tim Buzza, the combustion chamber is the first to light.
« Last Edit: 03/09/2010 06:15 pm by ugordan »

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #113 on: 03/09/2010 06:16 pm »
There was no ignition.

That doesn't constitute as proof.

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #114 on: 03/09/2010 06:16 pm »
Is it possible to guess whether they are contemplating a second attempt based on the current venting? I believe they have the range until 3:00PM
If it was a minor issue then yes. If it was a bad sensor, as minor as that is, then no as the sensor must be replaced. If it was more serious, such as a turbopump drive failure or start failure, then no. Regardless, unless they can attempt again today or in the next week and a half this will result in a good sized slip in the launch date. Probably end of April. Not sure if the first COTS flight will occur this year.

How long will we see continued venting if this attempt is a scrub?
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline FinalFrontier

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
  • Space Watcher
  • Liked: 1332
  • Likes Given: 173
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #115 on: 03/09/2010 06:17 pm »
The shutdown on Merlins causes a lot of soot and black smoke. What I'm wondering about is how come the pad deluge wasn't working then, it looks as though it was activated too early. The fire on the engine fairing looked scary.
Damage? Just from the scorching? I think they may have to roll it back to the hangar.
3-30-2017: The start of a great future
"Live Long and Prosper"

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #116 on: 03/09/2010 06:18 pm »
How long will we see continued venting if this attempt is a scrub?

Until LOX is detanked.

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #117 on: 03/09/2010 06:18 pm »
How long will we see continued venting if this attempt is a scrub?


As long as the anti-commercial guys hands hold out I guess  :P (j/k)
« Last Edit: 03/09/2010 06:19 pm by docmordrid »
DM

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #118 on: 03/09/2010 06:21 pm »
How long will we see continued venting if this attempt is a scrub?

Until LOX is detanked.

Time frame?
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Re: SpaceX: Falcon 9 Hotfire Updates
« Reply #119 on: 03/09/2010 06:22 pm »
How long will we see continued venting if this attempt is a scrub?


As long as the anti-commercial guys hands hold out I guess  :P (j/k)

LOL...:)

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0