-
#160
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 17 Nov, 2009 18:57
-
ELC 1 has now been grappled
-
#161
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:00
-
Now here is a timelapse video that turns hours of scanning into a four minute video, please watch it as I worked very hard and long on it:
-
#162
by
stockman
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:03
-
view from station now... should see a lot of this tomorrow.
-
#163
by
Aobrien
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:05
-
Now here is a timelapse video that turns hours of scanning into a four minute video, please watch it as I worked very hard and long on it:
That is JUST what I needed to see what I missed at school all day.
Great job!!!!
-
#164
by
TheFallen
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:07
-
Now here is a timelapse video that turns hours of scanning into a four minute video, please watch it as I worked very hard and long on it:
Good work, Ron
-
#165
by
John44
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:15
-
-
#166
by
stockman
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:21
-
-
#167
by
stockman
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:23
-
Yes.. Right over MY head... Great lakes in Ontario Canada.... Lake Erie and Lake Onario
-
#168
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:24
-
Centerline Camera installed to ODS:
-
#169
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:27
-
RMS grappling ELC 1 (always will be RMS to me, not SRMS)
Also downlinking OBSS scans during KU outages:
-
#170
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:31
-
Deactivating heaters in airlock
-
#171
by
Lawntonlookirs
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:40
-
Time lapse was great. A lot of hard work in putting it together.
-
#172
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:44
-
-
#173
by
Dapholine
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:48
-
Question: Why do they grapple ELC-1 already and not just put the RMS back to launch/re entry position? I thought they won't be using it until tomorrow at the ISS.
And Ronsmytheiii: thank you for the stopmotion movie of the TPS inspection!
-
#174
by
MikeMi.
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:49
-
It's funny to listen these conversations Megan with Charles. Again messy action while ago
Amazing job with that movie Ron!
-
#175
by
rdale
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:50
-
Question: Why do they grapple ELC-1 already and not just put the RMS back to launch/re entry position?
Per L2 documentation, it was a crew request. I'm not sure about the "why" part though.
-
#176
by
cd-slam
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:54
-
One asking about an expecting father (missed who).
Ah, it's about Randy. AP ask if they'd do a live conference with the delivery room. Will be based on assets available.
I hope that was a joke. Surely this would come under "private medical conference" and certainly not be televised? I don't think I would have wanted my childrens' delivery to be shown on national television.
-
#177
by
rdale
on 17 Nov, 2009 19:55
-
One asking about an expecting father (missed who).
Ah, it's about Randy. AP ask if they'd do a live conference with the delivery room. Will be based on assets available.
I hope that was a joke. Surely this would come under "private medical conference" and certainly not be televised? I don't think I would have wanted my childrens' delivery to be shown on national television.
Not a live conference for everyone to see. A live connection between Randy and his wife in the delivery room.
-
#178
by
Dapholine
on 17 Nov, 2009 20:09
-
[...]
Per L2 documentation, it was a crew request. I'm not sure about the "why" part though.
Thanks.
So perhaps the crew just wanted to skip the dock/undock actions.
-
#179
by
ChrisGebhardt
on 17 Nov, 2009 20:13
-
Question: Why do they grapple ELC-1 already and not just put the RMS back to launch/re entry position?
Per L2 documentation, it was a crew request. I'm not sure about the "why" part though.
Timeline constraints post-dock would be extremely tight if they had to dock, then unberth SRMS, then grapple ELC-1, then remove ELC-1. Grappling ELC-1 tonight simplifies the timeline tomorrow.
