Author Topic: XCOR and the Lynx rocket  (Read 620918 times)

Offline CameronD

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2427
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • Norton Consultants
  • Liked: 901
  • Likes Given: 564
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1120 on: 07/06/2017 05:13 am »
At this point much of the value of the engines is still in the heads of those who design, build, and test them.

I don't suppose there's any chance an Ex-Xcor engine might turn up at Virgin anytime soon then??
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine - however, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are
going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12192
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18489
  • Likes Given: 12553
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1121 on: 07/06/2017 12:26 pm »
ULA has the 5H25 engine and hydrogen pump on display at their Space Symposium booth:

All that hard work developing the engine and piston pump and they end up a permanent part of a ULA static display?!??  That can't be a good thing for the Lynx program..  :(

The Lynx didn't use Hydrogen - it had Kerosene and LOX pumps IIRC.

EDIT:
You know what, that was bad form.   The Lynx DOESN'T use Hydrogen.
Given the recent news: The Lynx DIDN'T use Hydrogen.

XCOR is dead. All that remains is bankruptcy and finding someone to buy the sad remains.

Offline Katana

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Liked: 49
  • Likes Given: 20
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1122 on: 07/06/2017 12:29 pm »
Drunken conversations at Space Access last year told me all I needed to know. It was a nice attempt to give the squeaky wheel a chance at the grease, but in the end no amount of engineering genius can make a business case close. I hope the team goes on to better tended pastures.
They do charged numerous customers for lynx tickets, each ticket worth of a house, and delivered nothing.

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1123 on: 07/06/2017 10:44 pm »
They do charged numerous customers for lynx tickets, each ticket worth of a house, and delivered nothing.

Citation needed. The most I ever heard was everyone who wanted to ride was added as an investor, and there wasn't all that many of them either, or actually worked for the company.

Edit: this comment of mine clearly doesn't reflect the resellers who Katana may have been referring to as "they". As far as I'm aware XCOR never saw a dime of that and one would hope these customers would have their money back by now. If not, I expect a news story or two about it in the future.
« Last Edit: 07/07/2017 01:01 am by QuantumG »
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Kryten

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 735
  • Liked: 426
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1124 on: 07/06/2017 10:52 pm »
Citation needed. The most I ever heard was everyone who wanted to ride was added as an investor, and there wasn't all that many of them either, or actually worked for the company.
http://spacenews.com/xcor-to-raise-ticket-prices-for-suborbital-flights/
Quote
The company, currently based in Mojave, California, but in the process of moving to Midland, Texas, said that the price of tickets for flights on its Lynx vehicle will increase from $100,000 to $150,000 effective Jan. 1, 2016.

“With the Lynx Mark I spacecraft closer to completion and first flight, the price will be raised to align more closely with the current market value of a commercial spaceflight,” said XCOR Space Expeditions, the Amsterdam-based subsidiary of XCOR Aerospace that serves as the sales office for Lynx tickets.
[...]
The company said it has sold more than 300 tickets, and Gibson believes the price increase would not diminish demand. “There is a market established for these tickets,” he said.
They also had at least one competition where the prizes were Lynx tickets.
« Last Edit: 07/06/2017 11:13 pm by Kryten »

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1125 on: 07/06/2017 11:04 pm »
... and where does it say that XCOR collected the money for these tickets? I don't even think they collected deposits. I know people who were eager to give money to XCOR and couldn't because of stupid US investment rules and they complained that they weren't getting deposits for tickets. I've not seen anything that says they were taking money for tickets, and it doesn't fit with what I know about the company. Happy to be corrected. Maybe this is simply a structuring issue... the "Amsterdam-based subsidiary" is on the hook for any money they've collected.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Elmar Moelzer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3670
  • Liked: 855
  • Likes Given: 1075
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1126 on: 07/06/2017 11:36 pm »
XCOR is dead. All that remains is bankruptcy and finding someone to buy the sad remains.
I saw it coming when the founders "left".

Offline CameronD

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2427
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • Norton Consultants
  • Liked: 901
  • Likes Given: 564
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1127 on: 07/06/2017 11:42 pm »
... and where does it say that XCOR collected the money for these tickets? I don't even think they collected deposits. I know people who were eager to give money to XCOR and couldn't because of stupid US investment rules and they complained that they weren't getting deposits for tickets. I've not seen anything that says they were taking money for tickets, and it doesn't fit with what I know about the company. Happy to be corrected. Maybe this is simply a structuring issue... the "Amsterdam-based subsidiary" is on the hook for any money they've collected.

Perhaps you're closer to the coal-face than the rest of us, but here's one high-profile example I know of:

Quote
The founder of manufacturing and distribution company NHP Electrical Products has paid $100,000 for the 30-minute ride.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/australias-first-space-tourist-to-be-octogenarian-nigel-peck-am/news-story/56ccefa169636ac59243e147afd62a95

Unfortunately, in this case, the passenger died before the Lynx program did*.  :(

https://www.ecdonline.com.au/content/business-and-management/news/-nhp-founder-nigel-peck-dies-at-89-1041151727


[* = Disclaimer:  Nigel's company and my company had a several decades-long association.  I knew him well.  He was looking forward to the trip and he is greatly missed.]
« Last Edit: 07/06/2017 11:45 pm by CameronD »
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine - however, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are
going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1128 on: 07/06/2017 11:48 pm »
I don't know what's hard to understand about this... Space Expedition Curacao and XCOR Space Expeditions are not the company we're talking about. I could see the confusion about the latter, as they at least have a related name, but how could you possibly mistake the former for XCOR? If you've handed money over to either of these companies you've probably been on the phone to them for quite some time now asking for it back. I really do wish you the best of luck, but I've never heard that XCOR received a dime of it. That's kinda the point of having separate companies.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline CameronD

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2427
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • Norton Consultants
  • Liked: 901
  • Likes Given: 564
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1129 on: 07/06/2017 11:55 pm »
I don't know what's hard to understand about this... Space Expedition Curacao and XCOR Space Expeditions are not the company we're talking about. I could see the confusion about the latter, as they at least have a related name, but how could you possibly mistake the former for XCOR? If you've handed money over to either of these companies you've probably been on the phone to them for quite some time now asking for it back. I really do wish you the best of luck, but I've never heard that XCOR received a dime of it. That's kinda the point of having separate companies.

Just assuming perhaps some of a paid deposit might have got to where it was supposed to go.. but, you say, it never did.

Good point.  My bad.

« Last Edit: 07/06/2017 11:56 pm by CameronD »
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine - however, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are
going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1130 on: 07/07/2017 12:14 am »
... and where does it say that XCOR collected the money for these tickets? I don't even think they collected deposits. I know people who were eager to give money to XCOR and couldn't because of stupid US investment rules and they complained that they weren't getting deposits for tickets. I've not seen anything that says they were taking money for tickets, and it doesn't fit with what I know about the company. Happy to be corrected. Maybe this is simply a structuring issue... the "Amsterdam-based subsidiary" is on the hook for any money they've collected.

I'm not sure why you are so argumentative about this. You asked for supporting evidence, and he gave some. What is your evidence to the contrary other than your assumptions? Do you have close connections to the XCOR (now ex-XCOR) team that shows that these two entities were that separate from each other? If so, please share it, instead of a "well *that* doesn't count" response.
« Last Edit: 07/07/2017 12:16 am by Lars-J »

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1131 on: 07/07/2017 12:28 am »
I'm not sure why you are so argumentative about this. You asked for supporting evidence, and he gave some.

Excuse me, I asked for evidence that XCOR was taking money for flights that are now not going to happen. No-one has yet to provide any evidence for that.

Quote from: Lars-J
Do you have close connections to the XCOR (now ex-XCOR) team that shows that these two entities were that separate from each other?

Uhhhh... duh. They're different entities in different countries. As for my "connections", that's called actually talking to the people who worked there, the people who had invested in the company and others who wanted to do so. Something any of you could do if you wanted to.


Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1132 on: 07/07/2017 12:37 am »
I'm not sure why you are so argumentative about this. You asked for supporting evidence, and he gave some.

Excuse me, I asked for evidence that XCOR was taking money for flights that are now not going to happen. No-one has yet to provide any evidence for that.

You wrote "I don't even think they collected deposits." An indication that you didn't know. See below...

Quote from: Lars-J
Do you have close connections to the XCOR (now ex-XCOR) team that shows that these two entities were that separate from each other?

Uhhhh... duh. They're different entities in different countries. As for my "connections", that's called actually talking to the people who worked there, the people who had invested in the company and others who wanted to do so. Something any of you could do if you wanted to.

Well, then why didn't you say so in the first place, instead of phrasing it like a speculation? If they had told you point blank that this never happened, then that surely paints a different picture. So... is that what you were told, or is it an assumption?

The XCOR folks - the higher ups - were surely aware of these deposits. Yet they were OK with not seeing any funds from their partner, despite the financial straits of the company? It seems strange. But if that's what you've heard, then that's what we have to accept.

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1133 on: 07/07/2017 12:52 am »
XCOR's ticket sales were supposed to go through operators. The 'operators' certainly took some deposits at some point, but

Quote
Xcor will not sell tickets directly, but will license sale of the 25-minute flights to existing space-adventure tourism companies, Greason says. The company has not yet revealed the price tag for flights aboard Lynx.
..
XCOR, though, doesn’t plan to operate the Lynx itself commercially, instead signing agreements with operators who would package the Lynx flights with training and other activities to sell to individual customers. Greason said that XCOR was in “quite advanced discussions” with one operator and has talked with several others

http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1095/1

https://phys.org/news/2008-12-rocketship-teams-xcor-aerospace.html

https://www.space.com/23757-space-tourist-training-per-wimmer.html

Quote
A year later, in 2006, XCOR Aerospace contacted Wimmer as well and offered him a chance to be the first astronaut to fly on their Lynx spacecraft, once it's ready to take to the sky. This ticket cost him $95,000.
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1134 on: 07/07/2017 12:56 am »
Well, then why didn't you say so in the first place, instead of phrasing it like a speculation? If they had told you point blank that this never happened, then that surely paints a different picture. So... is that what you were told, or is it an assumption?

I'm quite happy to receive new information. As I said, people were complaining that there was no way to support the company without becoming an investor and that's still an expensive/complicated proposition in the US.

Quote from: Lars-J
The XCOR folks - the higher ups - were surely aware of these deposits. Yet they were OK with not seeing any funds from their partner, despite the financial straits of the company?

I'm sure they were eagerly anticipating having something to deliver so they could get their hands on those deposits - but their partners would have to be complete idiots to hand over any of that money. Presumably months ago people were asking for it back.

Quote from: Lars-J
It seems strange. But if that's what you've heard, then that's what we have to accept.

You don't have to accept anything. I'm happy to be corrected, just give me something to contradict it.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1135 on: 07/07/2017 01:30 am »
XCOR's ticket sales were supposed to go through operators. The 'operators' certainly took some deposits at some point, but

Quote
Xcor will not sell tickets directly, but will license sale of the 25-minute flights to existing space-adventure tourism companies, Greason says. The company has not yet revealed the price tag for flights aboard Lynx.
..

https://www.space.com/23757-space-tourist-training-per-wimmer.html

Quote
A year later, in 2006, XCOR Aerospace contacted Wimmer as well and offered him a chance to be the first astronaut to fly on their Lynx spacecraft, once it's ready to take to the sky. This ticket cost him $95,000.

That Space.com article quote certainly paints a picture of XCOR being more directly involved in ticket sales, and directly reaching out to wealthy individuals. So either Greason changed his mind, or the article is wrong in this aspect.

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1136 on: 07/07/2017 01:36 am »
That Space.com article quote certainly paints a picture of XCOR being more directly involved in ticket sales, and directly reaching out to wealthy individuals. So either Greason changed his mind, or the article is wrong in this aspect.

Look at the dates on these articles. They never changed minds on running tickets and flfights through an operator, but those operators ( http://www.rocketshiptours.com/  , https://web.archive.org/web/20090205190900/http://rocketshiptours.com:80/aboutus.php ) weren't obviously that far apart from the company. Anyone writing for space.com would lump them together easily.
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14667
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14670
  • Likes Given: 1420
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1137 on: 07/07/2017 05:43 am »
XCOR's ticket sales were supposed to go through operators. The 'operators' certainly took some deposits at some point, but

Quote
Xcor will not sell tickets directly, but will license sale of the 25-minute flights to existing space-adventure tourism companies, Greason says. The company has not yet revealed the price tag for flights aboard Lynx.
..
XCOR, though, doesn’t plan to operate the Lynx itself commercially, instead signing agreements with operators who would package the Lynx flights with training and other activities to sell to individual customers. Greason said that XCOR was in “quite advanced discussions” with one operator and has talked with several others

http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1095/1

https://phys.org/news/2008-12-rocketship-teams-xcor-aerospace.html

https://www.space.com/23757-space-tourist-training-per-wimmer.html

Quote
A year later, in 2006, XCOR Aerospace contacted Wimmer as well and offered him a chance to be the first astronaut to fly on their Lynx spacecraft, once it's ready to take to the sky. This ticket cost him $95,000.

Wait... So if XCOR was going to "license sale of the 25-minute flights to existing space-adventure tourism companies" - wouldn't there be money flowing to XCOR?

And then said tourism companies charged deposits from customers, so that they could pay XCOR....   

So at least that's the plan of record, based on the information above.

Do we know that this plan didn't go through?

We know the tourism companies got paid, and if they sold tickets and XCOR didn't raise a stink, then we know XCOR knew about it, and we know XCOR was going to license these companies to sell tickets...

You can still say we don't know the money made it to its destination, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence...
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6458
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1138 on: 07/07/2017 05:49 am »
What are the chances XCOR does a fold and twist, re-emerging as a new/same company like Armadillo Aerospace did?

There's a number of these small space companies, some still dreaming and other defunct. Rather than hope for a large player or investor to buy and sit on the IP (which is a viable business plan to some), isn't there a chance these small companies could consolidate into a knowledgeble and viable one?
For example; EXOS + XCOR + Firefly + maybe Masten = success or further failure?

Putting together multiple failed or failing companies almost always equals a bigger failure.

In the case of XCOR, a lot of the key people already left some time ago, and they have new things they're up to now.  It seems unlikely you'd be able to reassemble substantially the same team.

Offline Archibald

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2611
  • Liked: 500
  • Likes Given: 1096
Re: XCOR and the Lynx rocket
« Reply #1139 on: 07/07/2017 07:26 am »
Hopefully some company will step in and the half-finished Lynx  won't be scrapped.
Han shot first and Gwynne Shotwell !

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0