-
#160
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 15:45
-
-
#161
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 15:53
-
getting ready to unberth...
-
#162
by
generic_handle_42
on 19 May, 2009 15:57
-
Latest article:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2009/05/hst-farewell-late-inspections-panel-11r-interest/
Tried to make a point that the potential MMOD strike is nothing to be scared of, so used the Columbia example....which I hate doing for obvious reasons. I hope you understand why I used her as context.
We all know that if Columbia's loss has a bright side (poor choice of words, I know) it is that she is helping to make every shuttle flight that much safer. I think it is this context of furthering our knowledge that your article looks at, and that's always fine by me! Besides, when people look for a baseline to compare RCC impacts, the first that jumps to mind will
always be Columbia.
-
#163
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:01
-
-
#164
by
nathan.moeller
on 19 May, 2009 16:05
-
Farewell Hubble. May the work of all those involved carry you through the next several years of scientific exploration!
-
#165
by
Chris Bergin
on 19 May, 2009 16:16
-
Latest article:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2009/05/hst-farewell-late-inspections-panel-11r-interest/
Tried to make a point that the potential MMOD strike is nothing to be scared of, so used the Columbia example....which I hate doing for obvious reasons. I hope you understand why I used her as context.
We all know that if Columbia's loss has a bright side (poor choice of words, I know) it is that she is helping to make every shuttle flight that much safer. I think it is this context of furthering our knowledge that your article looks at, and that's always fine by me! Besides, when people look for a baseline to compare RCC impacts, the first that jumps to mind will always be Columbia.
Thanks Nick, yeah - that's what I was worried about "Impact, RCC, arghhh.."
-
#166
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:20
-
I guess they are getting ready for the survey
-
#167
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:32
-
-
#168
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:33
-
-
#169
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:33
-
-
#170
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:55
-
-
#171
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 16:59
-
-
#172
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 17:04
-
-
#173
by
Chris Bergin
on 19 May, 2009 17:12
-
Starting soon, waiting for good lighting conditions.
-
#174
by
psloss
on 19 May, 2009 17:16
-
Also working repress of the crew cabin to 14.7 psi.
-
#175
by
Chris Bergin
on 19 May, 2009 17:18
-
Cabin pressure increase from the pre-breath EVA requirement of 10.2 psi to 14.7 psi.
-
#176
by
Chris Bergin
on 19 May, 2009 17:19
-
Here we go with the Starboard (right) wing RCC
-
#177
by
Lee Jay
on 19 May, 2009 17:19
-
I live and work at about 12 psi. When I go to 14.7 on travel, I tend to feel really, really energetic for the first two or three days. I suspect they'll get a good bit of that going from 10.2 to 14.7!
-
#178
by
stockman
on 19 May, 2009 17:21
-
-
#179
by
Chris Bergin
on 19 May, 2009 17:21
-