-
#100
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 13 May, 2009 13:41
-
ggo for nc burn
-
#101
by
psloss
on 13 May, 2009 13:41
-
Heh, Dan Burbank was out of the room for a moment, so Tony Ceccacci called that up to the crew.
-
#102
by
EirikV
on 13 May, 2009 13:44
-
213000 feet out, closing in at roughly 69 fps
-
#103
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 13:44
-
-
#104
by
AnalogMan
on 13 May, 2009 13:44
-
Here's the rendezvous profile from NC-4 (was not required) to MC-4. Small burn just made was NCC.
-
#105
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 13 May, 2009 13:44
-
-
#106
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 13:49
-
-
#107
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 13:54
-
-
#108
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 13 May, 2009 13:55
-
-
#109
by
shaula1247
on 13 May, 2009 13:55
-
I thought we got a third plot where there was a deviation between predicted and required. Could easily be wrong though.
The image above makes it pretty clear that I am (wrong that is)
-
#110
by
EirikV
on 13 May, 2009 13:57
-
We are less than 3hrs from scheduled HST capture
-
#111
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 14:09
-
-
#112
by
shaula1247
on 13 May, 2009 14:13
-
That's the one I was thinking of with required and predicted paths.
-
#113
by
Mike_1179
on 13 May, 2009 14:13
-
You can see in the top left corner the graphic above the path Atlantis would take without burns - the dotted yellow line. At the apogee of that orbit, there will be another burn to continue on the yellow path. I believe the burn at apogee (the top of the little loop) is the TI burn
Very cool to see orbital mechanics in action
-
#114
by
psloss
on 13 May, 2009 14:15
-
Crew was given a go for TI prior to the earlier period of ratty comm (although sounds like we're in another one)...TI PAD updates called up to the crew after that...
-
#115
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 14:15
-
-
#116
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 14:22
-
-
#117
by
Ronsmytheiii
on 13 May, 2009 14:34
-
-
#118
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 14:37
-
-
#119
by
MKremer
on 13 May, 2009 14:37
-
5 mins to Ti burn.
12s, left OMS only, 9.8ft/s
