Nice write-up!
I'm still unhappy about ACS getting the bump. I sure hope they can find a way to squeeze it in, but with the difficulty of STIS, they will have their 'gloves' filled.
I know if it were me, I'd leave off the thermal blankets until the very end, and do ACS as a get-ahead.
Nice write-up!
I'm still unhappy about ACS getting the bump. I sure hope they can find a way to squeeze it in, but with the difficulty of STIS, they will have their 'gloves' filled.
I know if it were me, I'd leave off the thermal blankets until the very end, and do ACS as a get-ahead.
Thank you.
And I feel your pain, but WFC-3 is actually the instrument that will allow us to peer back to something like 600-million years after the Big Bang. ACS is important, but in the grand scheme of things, other instruments hold the potential to yield more useful data on what the scientists want out of Hubble in the next 5-years or so.
