I was wondering why TerreStar-1 gets launched on an Ariane 5 and not an Atlas 5.Would the Ariane 5 with an over capacity of 2.9 tons still be cheaper than an Atlas 531 which has an overcapacity of only 0.7 ton?That would mean that an Ariane 5 costs less than 3/4 of what an Atlas 5 costs! (if you would look at the price per kilogram)
Quote from: ckiki lwai on 06/06/2009 09:58 amI was wondering why TerreStar-1 gets launched on an Ariane 5 and not an Atlas 5.Would the Ariane 5 with an over capacity of 2.9 tons still be cheaper than an Atlas 531 which has an overcapacity of only 0.7 ton?That would mean that an Ariane 5 costs less than 3/4 of what an Atlas 5 costs! (if you would look at the price per kilogram)IIUC, US military launches get priority on EELVs, which could have resulted in substantial delays. At least with Ariane they are guaranteed a slot in the manifest.
The old MSATs the Terrastars are replacing ain't doing so well. I'd guess they didn't go with the Proton they originally had scheduled because they want to get #1 up as soon as possible. They just bumped Terrastar 2 from a Zenit to a Proton. Maybe the same slot TS1 originally had. If they don't get the replacements up before the old ones fail a whole lot of people, including me are going to be up a creek. There's no other sats you can move MSAT equipment to.
Quote from: Nomadd on 06/08/2009 02:00 am The old MSATs the Terrastars are replacing ain't doing so well. I'd guess they didn't go with the Proton they originally had scheduled because they want to get #1 up as soon as possible. They just bumped Terrastar 2 from a Zenit to a Proton. Maybe the same slot TS1 originally had. If they don't get the replacements up before the old ones fail a whole lot of people, including me are going to be up a creek. There's no other sats you can move MSAT equipment to.You are confusing TerreStar with SkyTerra.