Even with the non-launch, in theory they were ground-testing Galaxy in late 2008. Did their schedule slip?
Their timeline had a complete Galaxy by now. Have there been any peeps about development?
They are still trying to hire enough people to actually come close to producing a Sundancer by 2012 or so...It is 2 yrs now that they have not been able to hire a Senior Life Support System Manager (and that is just the tip of the iceberg on hiring woes)...a pretty essential position for an on-orbit space habitat. Houston Office Update: finally was completely closed about a month ago. There are currently no operations or employees at the Houston location. A large company has recently inhabited the old SpaceHab/Astrium location next door. Never saw that many cars in that parking lot before; no sign out front yet as to what company it is that has moved in.
Are you saying Bigelow has closed or moved?
If they really haven't got a chance to launch a Galaxy, I wonder if they couldn't have a chat with Space-X and try to persuade them to lift one as a payload for one of the Falcon-9 or Falcon-9 Heavy test flights. It's high risk, but if they really can't get a ride any other way, it may be the only remaining option.Ross.
Its been just over a year, 2/5/2008 that Bigelow announced they were working with Lockheed. I have not heard anything since that press release. http://bigelowaerospace.com/news/?Terms_For_Launch_ServicesI'm betting that NASA wasn't very happy with Lockheed. It would be embarrassing for Bigelow to have a space station with people in it using American rockets while NASA was buying Russian.
Granted everyone's wallet is thinner these days, but isn't Bigelow's net worth roughly an order of magnitude greater than Musk's? How many people could Robert Bigelow point to and say "I don't have enough $$$, be my sugar daddy"? Of course there's the Feds, but I don't see them dumping money here.
Quote from: david1971 on 02/13/2009 03:01 pmGranted everyone's wallet is thinner these days, but isn't Bigelow's net worth roughly an order of magnitude greater than Musk's? How many people could Robert Bigelow point to and say "I don't have enough $$$, be my sugar daddy"? Of course there's the Feds, but I don't see them dumping money here.It might simply be the difference between "net worth" and liquid assets. Bigelow's money could be in the form of hotel buildings, whereas Musk's was in the form of bank accounts. Now, of course, Musk's money may largely be in the form of SpaceX (buildings, machinery, rockets...).