Author Topic: Space Ship Two - General Thread  (Read 748583 times)

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1380 on: 05/17/2014 05:52 am »
Ok, so a play on words with regards to "cracks" which I took literally. SS2 *doesn't* have spar cracks to add to its woes.

Understood.

Ya know, no-one ever accused me of being subtle.. but maybe I am?

Let me be clear: hybrids vibrate a lot, and they get worse the bigger you make them and the longer you burn them. Carbon fiber vehicles fall apart if you vibrate them too much. The bigger the vehicle, the more of a problem this is (depending on how you do your layups). SS2 has this problem. They measure the vibrations before they put the rocket on the vehicle. They've yet to do a full duration burn because it would crack the vehicle.

Clear?
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline banjo

  • Member
  • Posts: 44
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 11
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1381 on: 05/19/2014 06:02 am »
did snc tell scaled composites that the hybrid would scale up without problems?
or did scaled build ss2 without consulting snc?

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1382 on: 05/19/2014 06:10 am »
did snc tell scaled composites that the hybrid would scale up without problems?
or did scaled build ss2 without consulting snc?

I expect neither.. Scaled knew about the problems going in and SNC never claimed their hybrids defy the laws of physics. When it comes to working through these problems there may have been various amounts of undue optimism on either side.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Ric Capucho

  • Member
  • Posts: 68
  • Liked: 29
  • Likes Given: 18
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1383 on: 05/19/2014 06:41 am »

Ok, so a play on words with regards to "cracks" which I took literally. SS2 *doesn't* have spar cracks to add to its woes.

Understood.

Ya know, no-one ever accused me of being subtle.. but maybe I am?

Let me be clear: hybrids vibrate a lot, and they get worse the bigger you make them and the longer you burn them. Carbon fiber vehicles fall apart if you vibrate them too much. The bigger the vehicle, the more of a problem this is (depending on how you do your layups). SS2 has this problem. They measure the vibrations before they put the rocket on the vehicle. They've yet to do a full duration burn because it would crack the vehicle.

Clear?

Clearly spelt out now that you're using a sharper crayon.

Ric

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1384 on: 05/19/2014 09:50 am »
Wonder of PatanolicArc has acquired any more info on this since 3 days ago?

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/05/15/spaceshiptwo-reach-100-km-boundary-space/#disqus_thread

Quote
Douglas Messier xxxxx xxxxxxx 3 days ago

Mixed signals on that. At one point last year, they were looking to adapt the liquid Newton engine for SS2. Then that seems to have been taken off the table. But, more recently VG's Mark Butler was down in Las Cruces and seemed to imply their were going to do that .

Edit: found the quote,

http://www.lascrucesbulletin.com/index.php?pSetup=lascrucesbulletin&curDate=20140502&pageToLoad=showFreeArticle.php&type=art&index=04&title=Officials+share+plans+for+Spaceport

Quote
“We are developing rocket motors from scratch,” he said. “It is no mean feat. We know that type of engine has limited capabilities so we are also developing our own liquid rocket engines as well. That is what takes time. We have to get through the development stage happening now in California.”
« Last Edit: 05/19/2014 10:45 am by docmordrid »
DM

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14667
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14670
  • Likes Given: 1420
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1385 on: 05/19/2014 02:00 pm »
did snc tell scaled composites that the hybrid would scale up without problems?
or did scaled build ss2 without consulting snc?

I expect neither.. Scaled knew about the problems going in and SNC never claimed their hybrids defy the laws of physics. When it comes to working through these problems there may have been various amounts of undue optimism on either side.

I thought SSNC was only brought in after the accident, no?

If that is the case, then Scaled committed first
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline parabolicarc

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • Liked: 127
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1386 on: 05/21/2014 04:33 am »
did snc tell scaled composites that the hybrid would scale up without problems?
or did scaled build ss2 without consulting snc?

I expect neither.. Scaled knew about the problems going in and SNC never claimed their hybrids defy the laws of physics. When it comes to working through these problems there may have been various amounts of undue optimism on either side.

I thought SSNC was only brought in after the accident, no?

If that is the case, then Scaled committed first

After SSOne ended, Rutan & company decided to bring engine development in house. They had been working with SpaceDev, but Rutan and Jim Benson hated each other. So, Scaled worked away until July 2007 when the accident happened and three employees died. About a year later, SNC was brought into the project. SNC had in the interim purchased SpaceDev.

They've stuck with the rubber hybrid despite all the development problems and the fact that it's not remotely clean like Branson says it is (burning rubber in the upper atmosphere -- why could that be bad)? God knows why they didn't go with a liquid one years ago.

Offline parabolicarc

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • Liked: 127
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1387 on: 05/21/2014 04:42 am »
Here is a more detailed piece on what's going on with SpaceShipTwo:

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/05/15/spaceshiptwo-reach-100-km-boundary-space/

The engine they flew with would have torn the ship to pieces if they had gone anywhere near full duration.

All the assurances over the years about how well engine development was coming along....not true.


Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14667
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14670
  • Likes Given: 1420
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1388 on: 05/21/2014 05:24 am »
did snc tell scaled composites that the hybrid would scale up without problems?
or did scaled build ss2 without consulting snc?

I expect neither.. Scaled knew about the problems going in and SNC never claimed their hybrids defy the laws of physics. When it comes to working through these problems there may have been various amounts of undue optimism on either side.

I thought SSNC was only brought in after the accident, no?

If that is the case, then Scaled committed first

After SSOne ended, Rutan & company decided to bring engine development in house. They had been working with SpaceDev, but Rutan and Jim Benson hated each other. So, Scaled worked away until July 2007 when the accident happened and three employees died. About a year later, SNC was brought into the project. SNC had in the interim purchased SpaceDev.

They've stuck with the rubber hybrid despite all the development problems and the fact that it's not remotely clean like Branson says it is (burning rubber in the upper atmosphere -- why could that be bad)? God knows why they didn't go with a liquid one years ago.

Yup - I was just responding to the original question of: "did snc tell scaled composites that the hybrid would scale up without problems? or did scaled build ss2 without consulting snc?" - in that SC decided on their course of action before SNC was in the picture, and so consulting (or not) with SNC was not an option - this was SC's choice of direction.
« Last Edit: 05/21/2014 07:18 am by meekGee »
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline banjo

  • Member
  • Posts: 44
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 11
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1389 on: 05/21/2014 07:11 am »
thank's for the history lesson everyone.  wow, what a mess.   how do we see this panning out?     

Offline dougkeenan

Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1390 on: 05/21/2014 11:53 am »
Here is a more detailed piece on what's going on with SpaceShipTwo:

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/05/15/spaceshiptwo-reach-100-km-boundary-space/

The engine they flew with would have torn the ship to pieces if they had gone anywhere near full duration.

All the assurances over the years about how well engine development was coming along....not true.



Could they fly one via remote control and purposefully blow it up? 

I'm asking as a technical and flightpath question.

eta: empty obviously
« Last Edit: 05/21/2014 11:53 am by dougkeenan »

Offline Jim Davis

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Liked: 124
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1391 on: 05/21/2014 12:11 pm »
...but Rutan and Jim Benson hated each other.

Not to hijack the thread but this is the first I've heard of this. What was the source of enmity between the two?

Offline HMXHMX

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Liked: 2257
  • Likes Given: 672

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1393 on: 05/23/2014 07:16 pm »
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline Jarnis

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1314
  • Liked: 832
  • Likes Given: 204
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1394 on: 05/23/2014 07:25 pm »
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/virgin-voyage/virgin-galactic-makes-switch-spaceshiptwos-rocket-motor-n113216

Thanks for finding that. Interesting that they are saying "it won't be much of a delay"

Virgin Galactic is good at PR.

I'd call the years they've spent on the vehicle so far "a delay" and engine issues have definitely been a factor.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1395 on: 05/23/2014 09:15 pm »
Virgin Galactic Hybrid Rocket Motor Test - May 8 2014

Published on May 23, 2014
Footage from Virgin Galactic's recent Hybrid Rocket Motor Test

It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline Elmar Moelzer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3670
  • Liked: 855
  • Likes Given: 1075
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1396 on: 05/23/2014 09:21 pm »
Great video!
Looks like the quality of the burn is slowly getting less stable and clear after a while, or is that just my personal impression?

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1397 on: 05/23/2014 09:22 pm »
Why the fade out at the end ? Ran out of VHS tape ?
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6458
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1398 on: 05/23/2014 09:29 pm »
Here is a more detailed piece on what's going on with SpaceShipTwo:

http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/05/15/spaceshiptwo-reach-100-km-boundary-space/

The engine they flew with would have torn the ship to pieces if they had gone anywhere near full duration.

All the assurances over the years about how well engine development was coming along....not true.



Could they fly one via remote control and purposefully blow it up? 

I'm asking as a technical and flightpath question.

eta: empty obviously

Each copy of SpaceShipTwo is quite expensive.  They're only planning on building five of them, at least for a while.  Why destroy one?  Boeing didn't destroy any 787s in its test program for that craft, and it is planning to build far more than five of them.

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: Space Ship Two - General Thread
« Reply #1399 on: 05/23/2014 10:56 pm »
Great video!
Looks like the quality of the burn is slowly getting less stable and clear after a while, or is that just my personal impression?

Yes. The burn does not look very stable, the flame seems to "oscillate" a bit. But the combustion looks cleaner than the previous hybrid engine.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1