Author Topic: LIVE: STS-124 Flight Day 7 - JLM relocation / Flight Day 8 JEM RMS deployment  (Read 68630 times)

Offline Fuji

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1231
  • Japan
  • Liked: 234
  • Likes Given: 15
Kibo isn't so big now that they the racks inside it:

I think same.
By the way, these are not racks, soft covers.

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Liked: 1880
  • Likes Given: 1045
Kibo isn't so big now that they the racks inside it:

I think same.
By the way, these are not racks, soft covers.

Well most, there are 12 racks inside

Offline leetdan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 370
  • Space Coast
  • Liked: 323
  • Likes Given: 284
It is unfortunate that the PAO keeps using the term “permanent home” of the JLM, rather like rubbing salt in an open wound for JAXA.
:(

I'm not aware, how could this wording be considered insensitive?

JLP was originally supposed to transfer racks and equipment from the ground to Kibo ala the MPLM's, but now that the shuttle is ending it will stay as a kind of closet.

I see.  On that same topic (and the topic of the N2 Zenith CBM), was there ever any progress on the talks of leaving an MPLM permanently attached in the same fashion?

Offline Jorge

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6418
  • Liked: 543
  • Likes Given: 78
If they end up having a problem in the future with astronauts getting "stuck" in roomy spaces I would imagine they could use a pocket can of compressed air or something like that to propel themselves. 

Has there been planning done by the program for this?

Yes, but the solution is to prevent it by simply not designing spacecraft with roomy spaces in the first place. You can't get stuck if you're never more than a few feet from structure.
JRF

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Liked: 1880
  • Likes Given: 1045
I see.  On that same topic (and the topic of the N2 Zenith CBM), was there ever any progress on the talks of leaving an MPLM permanently attached in the same fashion?

Quote
hektor - 30/9/2006  1:08 PM

At some point there were plans to leave the last MPLM before retirement at the ISS... what happened to these studies ?

$$$$$

This topic is on the ISS assembly or Q&A Thread


Offline Ford Mustang

  • Live Coverage Editor
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12473
  • Virginia
    • Astro95Media
  • Liked: 375
  • Likes Given: 36
Shuttle/Station complex has now passed into an orbital sunset/night:

Offline C5C6

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 267
  • Córdoba - Argentina
    • programaespacial.com
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 0
If they end up having a problem in the future with astronauts getting "stuck" in roomy spaces I would imagine they could use a pocket can of compressed air or something like that to propel themselves. 

Has there been planning done by the program for this?

Yes, but the solution is to prevent it by simply not designing spacecraft with roomy spaces in the first place. You can't get stuck if you're never more than a few feet from structure.
Actually I think it's kind of impossible that they get stuck by mistake due to conservation of motion. The only way to stop in the middle of a module is with another person. Consider the FD6 games they played in the empty Kibo, they needed another person to locate them in a challenging position.....

Offline ckiki lwai

  • Aerospace engineering student
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 826
  • Europe, Belgium
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 3
Latest headline from Reuters: "Stranded in space? Japan's space lab too roomy"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080606/sc_nm/space_station_lab_dc_1

Too roomy? Are you kidding me? For Pete's sake, must they turn everything about the space program into a negative?

(Rhetorical question -- I know the answer)

they probably have never seen Skylab  ;)
But don't be too hard on those headlines, if they wanted to be negative they would have written "x billion dollar module added to space station after delay of more than y years".
They just wanted to make it more interesting/funny.
Don't ever become a pessimist... a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events. - Robert Heinlein

Offline jmjawors

  • Old Skool Scratchin'
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 900
  • Saint Louis
  • Liked: 9
  • Likes Given: 20
Talk now over the loops about getting a sample of the "grease" on the port SARJ during the next EVA.
.:: Matt ::.

Offline Life_Support_32

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 245
  • Houston, TX
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 0

well personally I don't know why they even bothered to move the JLP, the zenith CBM on harmony wont be used again, and the racks inside were taken out.  The only reason I can think of is that they wanted all the Kibo components together.


There are other systems on the JLM like GPS antennas

Also, with JLP docked on Node 2, it is only receiving power.  There is no command or telemetry control of JLP.  There is no smoke detection or emergency response with it there. 

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 5
I see.  On that same topic (and the topic of the N2 Zenith CBM), was there ever any progress on the talks of leaving an MPLM permanently attached in the same fashion?

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=7557.75
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline Ford Mustang

  • Live Coverage Editor
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12473
  • Virginia
    • Astro95Media
  • Liked: 375
  • Likes Given: 36
S/G 2 is private for Greg Chamitoff's Family Conference.

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Liked: 1880
  • Likes Given: 1045
Just out of curiosity, where is this camera?  It looks fantastic!

Offline jmjawors

  • Old Skool Scratchin'
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 900
  • Saint Louis
  • Liked: 9
  • Likes Given: 20
Must be on P3.
.:: Matt ::.

Offline Chris Bergin

Latest Article: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5442

This is again several elements based on L2 info, rather than publishing separate short stories through the day.

However, I am created a very long article on the TPS evalautions (via four documents on L2) and the resulting LON standdown (what LON would have involved, such as emergancy shipping of ET-127).
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline wjbarnett

Latest Article: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5442
... article on the TPS evalautions (via four documents on L2) and the resulting LON standdown (what LON would have involved, such as emergancy shipping of ET-127).

I came on-line late in the CDR tagup with Shuttle-MCC and thought I heard a request for additional pictures tonight of the RCC panels with the 1.4G event, rather than waiting for late inspections with OBSS. Did anyone else catch that?
« Last Edit: 06/07/2008 12:17 am by wjbarnett »
Jack

Offline Fuji

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1231
  • Japan
  • Liked: 234
  • Likes Given: 15
Latest Article: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5442
... article on the TPS evalautions (via four documents on L2) and the resulting LON standdown (what LON would have involved, such as emergancy shipping of ET-127).

I came on-line late in the CDR tagup with Shuttle-MCC and thought I heard a request for additional pictures tonight of the RCC panels with the 1.4G event, rather than waiting for late inspections with OBSS. Did anyone else catch that?

Yes. RCC 15, 16 starboard by using 800mm rens.
It's detected Flight Day 3.
« Last Edit: 06/07/2008 12:32 am by Fuji »

Offline Chris Bergin

Wouldn't be worried. 1-3G might not even be an impact in the first place. I think the record is 2.7G and there wasn't any sign of it in the late inspection imagery. Put it down to due diligence on the request.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Chris Bergin

STS-124 crew are about an hour away from their sleep period.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline robertross

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17939
  • Westphal, Nova Scotia
  • Liked: 659
  • Likes Given: 7725
Talk now over the loops about getting a sample of the "grease" on the port SARJ during the next EVA.

I wonder if they're just confirming it is only grease, and not combined with metal particles from the race ring, indicating premature TBA failure? Sorry if I sound like a broken record, still theorizing the SARJ 'smoking gun'.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0