Kibo isn't so big now that they the racks inside it:
Quote from: Ford Mustang on 06/06/2008 09:09 pmKibo isn't so big now that they the racks inside it:I think same. By the way, these are not racks, soft covers.
Quote from: leetdan on 06/06/2008 09:12 pmQuote from: Norm Hartnett on 06/06/2008 07:48 pmIt is unfortunate that the PAO keeps using the term “permanent home” of the JLM, rather like rubbing salt in an open wound for JAXA. I'm not aware, how could this wording be considered insensitive?JLP was originally supposed to transfer racks and equipment from the ground to Kibo ala the MPLM's, but now that the shuttle is ending it will stay as a kind of closet.
Quote from: Norm Hartnett on 06/06/2008 07:48 pmIt is unfortunate that the PAO keeps using the term “permanent home” of the JLM, rather like rubbing salt in an open wound for JAXA. I'm not aware, how could this wording be considered insensitive?
It is unfortunate that the PAO keeps using the term “permanent home” of the JLM, rather like rubbing salt in an open wound for JAXA.
If they end up having a problem in the future with astronauts getting "stuck" in roomy spaces I would imagine they could use a pocket can of compressed air or something like that to propel themselves. Has there been planning done by the program for this?
I see. On that same topic (and the topic of the N2 Zenith CBM), was there ever any progress on the talks of leaving an MPLM permanently attached in the same fashion?
Quotehektor - 30/9/2006 1:08 PMAt some point there were plans to leave the last MPLM before retirement at the ISS... what happened to these studies ?$$$$$This topic is on the ISS assembly or Q&A Thread
hektor - 30/9/2006 1:08 PMAt some point there were plans to leave the last MPLM before retirement at the ISS... what happened to these studies ?
Quote from: Bubbinski on 06/06/2008 09:03 pmIf they end up having a problem in the future with astronauts getting "stuck" in roomy spaces I would imagine they could use a pocket can of compressed air or something like that to propel themselves. Has there been planning done by the program for this?Yes, but the solution is to prevent it by simply not designing spacecraft with roomy spaces in the first place. You can't get stuck if you're never more than a few feet from structure.
Latest headline from Reuters: "Stranded in space? Japan's space lab too roomy"http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080606/sc_nm/space_station_lab_dc_1Too roomy? Are you kidding me? For Pete's sake, must they turn everything about the space program into a negative? (Rhetorical question -- I know the answer)
Quote from: Ronsmytheiii on 06/06/2008 08:25 pmwell personally I don't know why they even bothered to move the JLP, the zenith CBM on harmony wont be used again, and the racks inside were taken out. The only reason I can think of is that they wanted all the Kibo components together.There are other systems on the JLM like GPS antennas
well personally I don't know why they even bothered to move the JLP, the zenith CBM on harmony wont be used again, and the racks inside were taken out. The only reason I can think of is that they wanted all the Kibo components together.
Latest Article: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5442... article on the TPS evalautions (via four documents on L2) and the resulting LON standdown (what LON would have involved, such as emergancy shipping of ET-127).
Quote from: Chris Bergin on 06/06/2008 11:31 pmLatest Article: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5442... article on the TPS evalautions (via four documents on L2) and the resulting LON standdown (what LON would have involved, such as emergancy shipping of ET-127).I came on-line late in the CDR tagup with Shuttle-MCC and thought I heard a request for additional pictures tonight of the RCC panels with the 1.4G event, rather than waiting for late inspections with OBSS. Did anyone else catch that?
Talk now over the loops about getting a sample of the "grease" on the port SARJ during the next EVA.