A question for anyone--maybe the meteorology members... With global Geo-synch satellite coverage what does a polar weather bird give you? One obvious answer would be polar coverage but given these birds originally supported film based imagery collection by verifying targets weren't cloud covered to avoid wasting film and everything (except Russian collection) is digital now so film usage isn't a concern, I'm curious what having a shot every 12 hours gives you?
Quote from: GW_SimulationsWhy? Why not just deorbit the Centaur?Quote from: eergoAnd this leads to the "why are they doing it again?" question.Too much excess performance. IIRC, the reentry became a bit complicated (trying to make sure it came down in the right spot). The escape option gives an opportunity to test a number of improvements that could help on future missions - not necessarily any specific flights, just generically.
Why? Why not just deorbit the Centaur?
And this leads to the "why are they doing it again?" question.
Does anyone have a contact for the folks doing the Centaur experiment?We'll want to know the post-burn state vector here at the Center for Astrophysics, so that when the Minor Planet Center folks track it as an apparent asteroid they don't confuse it with a hazardous Near-Earth-Object.Thanks, Jonathan
NPOESS, which should be the DMSP follow-on program, justifies polar orbits here: http://www.ipo.noaa.gov/index.php?pg=yporbit&tab=5
Quote from: jcm on 10/14/2009 05:09 pmDoes anyone have a contact for the folks doing the Centaur experiment?We'll want to know the post-burn state vector here at the Center for Astrophysics, so that when the Minor Planet Center folks track it as an apparent asteroid they don't confuse it with a hazardous Near-Earth-Object.Thanks, JonathanPing me offline and I'll put you in contact.~Jon
Quote from: jongoff on 10/14/2009 05:49 pmQuote from: jcm on 10/14/2009 05:09 pmDoes anyone have a contact for the folks doing the Centaur experiment?We'll want to know the post-burn state vector here at the Center for Astrophysics, so that when the Minor Planet Center folks track it as an apparent asteroid they don't confuse it with a hazardous Near-Earth-Object.Thanks, JonathanPing me offline and I'll put you in contact.~JonI use to have a collection of Boeing "pop up reports" for upper stages in solar orbits as this is a topic of interest to me would love to start a collection like that anew
Higher resolution? There might also be useful information about the vertical profile of the atmosphere that you can get if you look at a slant, that won't work from geosync.
Cork NoseconeIs the 14 foot payload fairing for this launch essentially the same as the one developed in 1990 for Atlas I? Does this one use a cork coating on the nosecone? (Do any other fairings use cork?)
Launch preview - by Chris Gebhardt:http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2009/10/live-atlas-600th-mission-launch-dmsp-f18-vandenberg/