Author Topic: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB  (Read 4759 times)

Offline Spirit

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 180
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« on: 04/29/2008 12:16 pm »
Is there any difference between Zenit 3SL and Zenit 3SLB or the "B" just indicates that it will be launched from Baikonur?

It seems that after introducing the SLB, Zenit 3 can fly almost every month. What is the difference in the payload that SL and SLB can launch, having in mind that they are being launched from different latitudes?
Regards,
Atanas

Offline sammie

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 553
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #1 on: 04/29/2008 04:23 pm »
There are a number of differences, the biggest one being the lesser involvement of Boeing as a partner on the project.

From the Sea Launch website the following differences can be extracted:

Quote
Using existing Zenit infrastructure at the Baikonur Space Center, the Land Launch system is based on a modified version of the proven Sea Launch vehicle, the three-stage Zenit-3SL. Land Launch's Zenit-3SLB vehicle addresses the launch needs of commercial satellites weighing up to three-and-a-half metric tonnes. The two-stage Zenit-2SLB is also available for lifting payloads up to thirteen metric tonnes to inclined low Earth orbits.

The fairings represent the most significance difference. In place of the Boeing-made fairing used on Sea Launch, the Zenit-3SLB adopts a 4-meter fairing made by NPO Lavochkin. It is in current production and has been flight-proven with the Block DM. The Zenit-2SLB fairing is an improved version of the heritage Zenit-2 fairing.

These are the hardware differences, I'm not to sure how things are organized personell and responsibility wise....
"The dreams ain't broken downhere, they're just walking with a limp"

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37813
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22033
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #2 on: 04/29/2008 04:44 pm »
I would say that Boeing has lesser involvement, they just aren't supplying the fairing.  Landlaunch is still 40% Boeing

Offline Nick L.

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3857
  • A unique little aerospace company
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 4
RE: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #3 on: 04/29/2008 04:51 pm »
The 3SLB has a lighter third stage (fixed instead of deployable antennas, removal of some tanks, and some other changes) in addition to the different fairing.
"Now you may leave here for four days in space, but when you return it's the same old place..."

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #4 on: 04/30/2008 03:22 am »
Is the mysterious Lavochkin fairing the one that is used on Proton?

Offline zaitcev

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 581
    • mee.nu:zaitcev:space
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #5 on: 04/30/2008 03:50 am »
Quote
Danderman - 29/4/2008  8:22 PM
Is the mysterious Lavochkin fairing the one that is used on Proton?
Look at this:
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=10504&mid=244791#M244791
For some reason, the forum software bumps to the bottom of the thread. Rewind to page 2 and search the message by Stan Black:
Quote
This fairing was used for Yamal, looks similiar to the Khrunichev but what gives it away is that on the DM there is a tapered section placed around the torus instrument section.

Offline sammie

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 553
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #6 on: 05/02/2008 01:08 pm »
some more on the upperstage differences from spaceflight now

Quote
The Block DM-SLB upper stage also endured several modifications focused on reducing the rocket's weight. The changes shed more than 4,000 pounds from the similar stage used on Sea Launch missions.

Engineers swapped the stage's single avionics bay with several lightweight containers, replaced a deployable antenna and telemetry system with fixed antennas, removed a set of fuel tanks for the rocket's attitude control system, and took out a command system that was deemed unnecessary, according to Sea Launch.

Engineers also added two control jets to the stage to increase the rocket's reliability. The small thrusters will help settle the stage's kerosene and liquid oxygen propellants before the mission's final major engine firing to decrease the amount of fuel needed for the burn to begin.
"The dreams ain't broken downhere, they're just walking with a limp"

Offline Jos

  • Member
  • Posts: 13
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #7 on: 05/02/2008 01:35 pm »
Is Sealaunch also going to use this improved upper stage?

Offline markododa

  • Member
  • Posts: 52
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 111
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #8 on: 12/23/2010 07:58 am »
why does zenit has those cartoonish red tip/stripes/squares ? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/Zenit-2_rocket_ready_for_launch.jpg. looks like a giant pencil :D

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Zenit 3SL vs 3SLB
« Reply #9 on: 12/24/2010 03:38 am »
One major difference is that LandLaunch has no requirement for TDRS on the payload adapter interface.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1