Author Topic: ATK's new vehicle to provide multi-access options  (Read 27355 times)

Offline James Lowe1

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • New York City
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: ATK's new vehicle to provide multi-access options
« Reply #60 on: 03/08/2008 05:34 pm »
This is about ATK's vehicle and it's not Constellation related, so let's keep it on topic. Thread deleted back.

Offline marsavian

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 3
RE: ATK's new vehicle to provide multi-access options
« Reply #61 on: 03/08/2008 05:39 pm »
Will ATK even bother with this design considering they have the upper stage of Taurus II and that's now being built ? I suspect not.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
RE: ATK's new vehicle to provide multi-access options
« Reply #62 on: 03/08/2008 11:36 pm »
Quote
marsavian - 8/3/2008  12:39 PM

Will ATK even bother with this design considering they have the upper stage of Taurus II and that's now being built ? I suspect not.

In January, ATK said that the top three stages (Castor 120/Castor 30/OAM) of its COTS demo booster could fly as a small launch vehicle - something fairly similar to Lockheed's Athena I.  It said that it already had signed three customers for the smaller booster.  I wouldn't be surprised to see this happen, since ATK needs to sell Castor 120 motors.

It also seems likely that an SRB-derived booster could appear in future COTS-type proposals.  It makes sense to try to find ways to leverage the existing SRB production line for other purposes.  

 - Ed Kyle

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
RE: ATK's new vehicle to provide multi-access options
« Reply #63 on: 03/08/2008 11:40 pm »
Quote
edkyle99 - 8/3/2008  6:36 PM
It also seems likely that an SRB-derived booster could appear in future COTS-type proposals.  It makes sense to try to find ways to leverage the existing SRB production line for other purposes.
There is significant pressure from NASA HQ to increase its ROI on keeping the STS SRB line open.  ATK has to at least propose it whenever possible.  Else MG will not be pleased.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0