sts1canada - 3/11/2007 11:46 AMI think as long as the mast is fully extended 100% as it is now, the SARJ can move again, I believe the structural concerns was more to do with having a partially deployed mast instead of the arrays.
sts1canada - 3/11/2007 11:46 AM I think as long as the mast is fully extended 100% as it is now, the SARJ can move again, I believe the structural concerns was more to do with having a partially deployed mast instead of the arrays. Richard
I think as long as the mast is fully extended 100% as it is now, the SARJ can move again, I believe the structural concerns was more to do with having a partially deployed mast instead of the arrays. Richard
I was surprised to read in the Electric Systems Manual that the mast may have only 10% of its structural strength depending on how far it's deployed. Everyone's tension is now in the mast, where it should be. Time for much toasting.
shaula1247 - 3/11/2007 4:54 PMDoes anyone have the clock on the OBSS. Sorry, I missed its start time.
kraisee - 3/11/2007 12:22 PMWhile they continue to wrap this EVA up, I have to say that was an awesome job they all did today - especially Scott. It was very impressive to watch all the planning really come together they way they hoped.My only question now is does anyone have an idea when they expect to know about the state of the OBSS instruments after all of this?Ross.