Author Topic: LIVE: STS-120 Flight Day 6 - EVA-2 (Read 89916 times)

MKremer · « **Reply #280 on:** 10/28/2007 05:11 pm »

Quote

Lee Jay - 28/10/2007 11:09 AM

How much of a potential show-stopper do people think the SARJ issue could become?

Not really a "show stopper". They've already said if need be they'll halt the SARJ rotation at an optimum angle for power generation without losing too much overall power.

Felix · « **Reply #281 on:** 10/28/2007 05:16 pm »

Mission Status Briefing

Felix · « **Reply #282 on:** 10/28/2007 05:18 pm »

Animation of P6 relocation

ChrisC · « **Reply #283 on:** 10/28/2007 05:22 pm »

AARGH! Don't start early! Fortunately I tuned in early ...

Felix · « **Reply #284 on:** 10/28/2007 05:29 pm »

Replay: Dan Tani taking samples during SARJ inspection

Felix · « **Reply #285 on:** 10/28/2007 05:30 pm »

Tape with sample inside the station

triddirt · « **Reply #286 on:** 10/28/2007 05:32 pm »

EVA time reported as 6:33 for those who keep track of such things

Felix · « **Reply #287 on:** 10/28/2007 05:33 pm »

Felix · « **Reply #288 on:** 10/28/2007 05:38 pm »

With P6 deployed they get enough power to limit the motion of the SARJ

Felix · « **Reply #289 on:** 10/28/2007 05:42 pm »

SARJ problem turned up "about 50 days ago". SARJ worked fine before

Felix · « **Reply #290 on:** 10/28/2007 05:51 pm »

Vibrations caused by the debris in the SARJ may cause damage in the long-term

mark147 · « **Reply #291 on:** 10/28/2007 05:53 pm »

Quote

Felix - 28/10/2007 6:42 PM

SARJ problem turned up "about 15 days ago". SARJ worked fine before

I heard 50 not 15...

Felix · « **Reply #292 on:** 10/28/2007 05:57 pm »

Quote

mark147 - 28/10/2007 7:53 PM
Quote
Felix - 28/10/2007 6:42 PM SARJ problem turned up "about 15 days ago". SARJ worked fine before
I heard 50 not 15...

You're probably right. Sorry