Bubbinski - 4/10/2006 8:55 PMNot even close. The hole was ~0.1 inch, and whatever caused it could have been significantly smaller. AFAIK, the smallest items routinely tracked from the ground are 10s of inches.
Would something that makes a hole that size be trackable by radars?
rdale - 5/10/2006 1:25 PMI agree, with the main point being that it isn't known when the MMOD hit the radiator panel. It could have been on FD1 or it could have been on FD13.
Given that this is the largest strike ever, and the shuttle has been aloft for MANY hours over the years, I can't see how an extra 24h in space is worth the cost and risk of bringing it down on the other side of the country...
dutch courage - 5/10/2006 8:48 AMNo need for that, IMO, and it's not really worth the time/trouble. The most critical re-entry element, the CM heat shield, is buried in the SM. Also, once the CEV un-docks it will almost immediately go into the re-entry phase, much like Soyuz does, and not 'hang around' in LEO.
Orion will visit the ISS in 2014 or just about. I wonder if the station arm will be used to check for MMOD hits to Orion.
A Laser Dynamic Range Imager could be attached to the station arm.
Bubbinski - 4/10/2006 10:55 PM
would this be a good argument for shortening missions to the minimum required duration to meet mission objectives, and landing on the scheduled landing day, no matter where the shuttle has to land (Edwards or White Sands) rather than wait an extra day for weather to clear at KSC? Are there any discussions on that?
pip - 5/10/2006 2:59 PM
Wow, that is pretty scary. Makes me wonder, though. What is the procedure if the space shuttle is struck by a MMOD and it leaves a hole in the crew compartment causing decompression? Can the shuttle's life support systems go into some mode where they can compensate for a short period of time, just pumping a lot of new air into the cabin? Does the crew attempt to don their pressure suits? Do they have hose interfaces to get air from the shuttle or would they be doomed? If at the ISS, do they all just flee into the station and ditch the ship?
MKremer - 5/10/2006 3:09 PM
Small 'holes' don't leak that fast at the orbiter crew compartment pressure - unless it's a really big hole (1/2" or larger) there would normally be plenty of time and O2 reserves to find and patch an impact hole.
astrobrian - 6/10/2006 1:06 PM
CNNs Miles OBrien Gave this site specific credit for being first with the release of the MMOD picture. :)
astrobrian - 6/10/2006 7:06 AMI didn't see the broadcast myself, but my inbox is full this morning with notes from collectSPACE readers that the photo shown by Miles (and apparently Lou Dobbs last night) carried "Collect Space" as the credit...
CNNs Miles OBrien Gave this site specific credit for being first with the release of the MMOD picture. :)
rdale - 6/10/2006 8:14 AM
Screwed by Florida Today though - their top story says "The hole's existence was first reported Thursday on NASA's Web site."
collectspace - 6/10/2006 8:32 AMQuoteastrobrian - 6/10/2006 7:06 AMI didn't see the broadcast myself, but my inbox is full this morning with notes from collectSPACE readers that the photo shown by Miles (and apparently Lou Dobbs last night) carried "Collect Space" as the credit...
CNNs Miles OBrien Gave this site specific credit for being first with the release of the MMOD picture. :)
On edit, I received a call from CNN this morning confirming that they had been using our site as the source. They were however, getting ready to switch to using NASA.
Paul Howard - 6/10/2006 10:14 AMRight, and as our readers' e-mails (and later CNN itself) confirmed it was cS that means it wasn't NSF, hence my reply to Brian's post...
That's nice, but I think Astrobrian means NSF when he says this site ;) Can you confirm that?
Paul Howard - 6/10/2006 4:14 PM
It's nice this site didn't change to the NASA photo either as I was expecting the article to change to the NASA.gov photos.
Orion_Guy - 6/10/2006 10:53 AM
I'm guessing that they meant that NASA first reported it on Thursday.
rdale - 6/10/2006 4:38 PMQuoteOrion_Guy - 6/10/2006 10:53 AM
I'm guessing that they meant that NASA first reported it on Thursday.
Then why go to the trouble to take references to NSF out? Someone (either FlaTod or AP) did that intentionally for some reason.
51D Mascot - 6/10/2006 10:21 AM
I requested an overview from NASA and got this yesterday (Thursday) which doesn't offer a lot of new detail, but is a handy summation of NASA commentary to this point on this:
Chris Bergin - 6/10/2006 7:34 AMQuoteastrobrian - 6/10/2006 1:06 PM CNNs Miles OBrien Gave this site specific credit for being first with the release of the MMOD picture. :)Did he? As in on the TV? :o :)
Yup. saw it this morning just before heading to work, around 630am central time
collectspace - 6/10/2006 8:32 AMQuoteastrobrian - 6/10/2006 7:06 AM CNNs Miles OBrien Gave this site specific credit for being first with the release of the MMOD picture. :)I didn't see the broadcast myself, but my inbox is full this morning with notes from collectSPACE readers that the photo shown by Miles (and apparently Lou Dobbs last night) carried "Collect Space" as the credit... On edit, I received a call from CNN this morning confirming that they had been using our site as the source. They were however, getting ready to switch to using NASA.
The picture did indeed say collect space in the upper right corner, but this site was mention in the talking going on relating to the story and said we had it first
astrobrian - 6/10/2006 10:30 PMQuoteChris Bergin - 6/10/2006 7:34 AMQuoteastrobrian - 6/10/2006 1:06 PM CNNs Miles OBrien Gave this site specific credit for being first with the release of the MMOD picture. :)Did he? As in on the TV? :o :)
Yup. saw it this morning just before heading to work, around 630am central time