NASASpaceFlight.com Forum

General Discussion => Q&A Section => Topic started by: freda on 11/12/2018 02:37 pm

Title: Q&A - optimal approach to a planet
Post by: freda on 11/12/2018 02:37 pm
I was looking at http://cristianopi.altervista.org/as/ and selected the Juno probe.

One of the graphs shows Juno approaching Jupiter from the "Sun" side, then "backing" into the eventual orbit.    I think I heard that some Mars probes have done that too, rather than approaching from the "outer" side and going head-first directly into the eventual orbit.

This is a fun detail to think about, and might fit into this Q&A thread:

Q1) What are the trade-offs in using either approach method?  Direct orbit entry verses "backing" into the orbit.

Q2) Could an approaching probe/capsule/lander even optimize the backing" maneuver so as to meet the planet at almost no (or minimum) relative velocity, hence reducing the heat-shield requirement needed to enter the atmosphere?

Q3) The "backing" maneuver seems to be used when approaching an outer planet from an inner planet (eg: probe is going from Earth to Mars).  What are the issues in a probe/capsule returning to an inner planet (eg: Mars to Earth)?

Image from the referenced site showing Juno approaching Jupiter is attached:  "Sun"-side is to the right.  You can see Juno (green color) approaches, slows, and "backs" into Jupiter to be captured.
Title: Re: Q&A - optimal approach to a planet
Post by: Lars-J on 11/14/2018 12:17 am
Q1 - "Backing" in to the orbit is the more energy efficient one, since you are doing the opposite of a typical momentum transfer slingshot - but instead the planet helps you slow down. That will reduce the delta-v needed to capture into an orbit of the planet, BUT it will tend to leave you in a retro-grade orbit. (Bad if you plan on reaching the moons) 

Q2 - No, there is no such trajectory. If there was, the opposite trajectory would also exist, where you could leave a planet with no or minimum relative velocity.

The best way to learn about this stuff is to play Kerbal Space Program.  :)
Title: Re: Q&A - optimal approach to a planet
Post by: speedevil on 11/14/2018 02:57 am
There are also 'low power' aerocaptures.
Several Mars satellites have done this.
Start off in the lowest energy transfer orbit, and then do a ~800m/s burn to put you in a week period orbit or so with a minimum distance of just over what you think the worst case atmosphere is.
Gradually lower your orbit until you start touching the atmosphere - gently enough that you can use solar panels as drag surfaces, and then carefully continue slowly braking down each orbit for a few months till you're in low orbit.

This is a much kinder gentler approach than hitting the atmosphere at 10km/s and relying on your atmospheric model being Juuust right.

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/Odyssey_summary_br.jpg/1024px-Odyssey_summary_br.jpg)